Why even leave New Hampshire? That state would by my second choice on where to live, with my first being my home state of Idaho. The only reasons why its not my #1 is the number of New Yorkers and MassHoles that visit and it's fucking humidity.
New Hampshire is basically Vermont if Vermont had part of the Boston metro stuck up it's ass (VT has Burlington as a consolation dildo). There's a bunch of New England hills that somehow have swamps on top, and then a few big bitchin' mountains to change it up. It's cold, T-shirt weather is an inconsistent 3 months and you might still need a hoodie at night, there's not much industry off the coast, there's not much of anything away from the coast (the coastal zone is where all the Boston sprawl is).
It's not difficult for me to imagine someone from Idaho being alright with NH, but it's not a place I'd personally be interested in and I'm sure a lot of other people wouldn't love it either. If I was gonna live up in the hills I'd do it somewhere you're not fighting frost for 7 months of the year. It can be tough to make a living up there too.
View attachment 2496185
Previous failed vaccines were pulled when deaths were in the tens of victims.
Damn that can't be right, you mean to tell me that out of 600k total reports made about side-effects, more than 2% of them were for
death? I realize that many (most?) people who only had minor effects didn't fill out a report, but the proportion of serious adverse effects here in the reported data itself still seems pretty high.
Only 100k office visits (what I'd imagine the most minor clinical interaction would be) but 13k deaths? For every 4 people that were hospitalized, 1 died? See this is the kind of fat tail risk profile that you'd do best to avoid in something with questionable efficacy, or something that is not immediately critical for your well-being. Sure, the odds of you dying from a prophylactic mRNA product are low, but if you DO react poorly, and it happens, you're at serious risk of all sorts of fucked up shit... and these are just the
immediate recorded effects.
I'm gonna head any fanatics off at the pass (you know who you guys are, hello) before I hear about how CVOID has fat tail risks too, and say that I don't believe the overall risk profile from CVOID for young and healthy people is significant enough to warrant this treatment, also keeping in mind that the mRNA products are already shown to allow breakthrough infections, potentially severe ones at that. I wouldn't wanna roll dice against my health any more than necessary, and effectively you will roll multiple times if you take an mRNA product - It's virtually guaranteed by this point that any beneficial effects will wear off, if not in a few months then in a few years, and the possibility of ADE and other immune fuckups remains high, along with the potential for long term consequences from a gay new miracle SCIENCE.
Mostly I just feel bad for anyone who hasn't had the shit yet. That's the best place to be in right now. Sitting pretty knowing I'm basically set for life (until I'm old and frail anyway) against this fake gay virus, rather than wondering if I'll get a breakthrough infection because some other asshole with 200x the natural viral load spooped on me, or when (apparently no longer "if") I'm gonna have to take more pharma drugs (pbuh), or whether having diarrhea means I'm just gross or it's my immune system eating itself.
archive.vn
