Why are Americans backwards faggots when it comes to abortion?

Sort by date Sort by votes
Why do Americans have unprotected sex without assuming the consequences and proceed to look at abortion as a first option? Why do they say "my body, my choice" but forget the baby as has a body yet has no choice? Abortion would be a lot less of a hot-button issue if it was used more as a last resort and if people were more honest about the whole thing. Some women get abortions without even acknowledging they're essentially killing a partially-formed baby. Shit's fucked.

Planned Parenthoods are usually placed in poor neighborhoods, where most people happen to be black. Apparently they also sell fetuses, making abortion way more profitable than it should be. Then the leftie faggots spin this around as female empowerment to try and avoid addressing how abortion, by their rules, happens to be racist as fuck.
 
  • Like
  • Autistic
  • Dumb
Reactions: Embaby Cumjar, Local Fed, SSj_Ness (Yiffed) and 8 others
Upvote 2 Downvote
Duke Nukem said:
The same people who oppose abortion are also against condoms and birth control. Let that sink in for a minute.
Click to expand...
They don't actually care about the fetus; they just want to punish women for having sex with 18 years of responsibility. Once the fetus comes out they don't give two shits if it lives or dies.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Dislike
Reactions: WebLurker, Embaby Cumjar, SSj_Ness (Yiffed) and 3 others
Upvote -2 Downvote
crucifiction009 said:
They don't actually care about the fetus; they just want to punish women for having sex with 18 years of responsibility. Once the fetus comes out they don't give two shits if it lives or dies.
Click to expand...
That's probably the case, and then they get mad when women won't have sex with them. People think that incels are conservatives, sure some beliefs may overlap, but honestly they're just shooting themselves in the foot if they want to get laid. But let's be honest it's not happening for them either way.
 
  • Autistic
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Embaby Cumjar, SSj_Ness (Yiffed), RurkerHivemind and 1 other person
Upvote -1 Downvote
I think most Americans don't care but the ones that do are very loud and also the most likely to go out and vote, so they and the their similarly extreme opposition muddy up what should turn into reasonable abortion laws.

crucifiction009 said:
They don't actually care about the fetus; they just want to punish women for having sex with 18 years of responsibility. Once the fetus comes out they don't give two shits if it lives or dies.
Click to expand...
Yeah, some of them literally say "whores should be held responsible for their actions". It's really bizarre.
 
  • Like
  • Dislike
Reactions: WebLurker, Embaby Cumjar, SSj_Ness (Yiffed) and 1 other person
Upvote 0 Downvote
crucifiction009 said:
They don't actually care about the fetus; they just want to punish women for having sex with 18 years of responsibility. Once the fetus comes out they don't give two shits if it lives or dies.
Click to expand...

Thsy sure do fund a lot of children's hospitals, adoption services, childcare focused charities, etc for people that don't care about kids.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: SSj_Ness (Yiffed), Chocolate Wombat, KateHikes14 and 3 others
Upvote 3 Downvote
Miles Peterson said:
Thsy sure do fund a lot of children's hospitals, adoption services, childcare focused charities, etc for people that don't care about kids.
Click to expand...
They're also very outwardly against paying taxes and those taxes being used to provide stable funding to child-focused services rather than the children being at the mercy of their donors' generosity (or current need to stay in a lower tax bracket by "donating") It's only okay with them if they can choose to withdraw their support as soon as it becomes inconvenient.
 
  • Dumb
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: WebLurker, Embaby Cumjar, SSj_Ness (Yiffed) and 2 others
Upvote -4 Downvote
crucifiction009 said:
They're also very outwardly against paying taxes and those taxes being used to provide stable funding to child-focused services rather than the children being at the mercy of their donors' generosity (or current need to stay in a lower tax bracket by "donating") It's only okay with them if they can choose to withdraw their support as soon as it becomes inconvenient.
Click to expand...

Ok, so we're sticking with the tired cliches. Wonderful.

Counterpoint 1:
help-your-neighbour-and-take-care-of-the-poor-and-helpless-but-jesus-cant-we-just-give-money-t...jpg


When you have a personal moral obligation to do something, thst means you have to actually work at it yourself, rather than just passively letting someone else do it.

Counterpoint 2: Have you seen how US government programs work? We have a massive thread documenting how Susan Scofield was blatantly and openly abusing her kids for the better part of a decade while the state sat by and did nothing to intervene and help them, and she was an extremely high profile and publicly visable person compared to the norm, in an incredibly rich state with a well developed and funded welfare system. What on earth makes you think the state is actually qualified or competent to run a better system?

Counterpoint 3: I have never seen anyone making the same "arguments" you are actually back up this claim about how "they only use private funding as a means of control, they'll totally cut funding and screw over the kids to assert control" actually back up that claim with any evidence or real world incidents, just speculation. I doubt you'll be the first.

Also, why do you think the government does not do that? Governments from the federal level on down are notorious for cutting emergency services, school programs, and other systems when the budget gets tight, just to hurt people and try and force them to go along with the governments desired budgets. That includes crippling social welfare programs.

Counterpoint 4: Everyone is outwardly against paying taxes, at the very best you'll get some poeple that argue for other people paying higher taxes, just not them.
 
  • Winner
  • Semper Fidelis
  • Informative
Reactions: Embaby Cumjar, pleasegoaway, SSj_Ness (Yiffed) and 9 others
Upvote 4 Downvote
Abortions should be outlawed and every unwanted baby that is born should be shipped off into war camps where they are beaten into obedience and taught how to kill. Fast forward 10 years and America has an unstoppable army of child soldiers that the world doesn't have the heart to fight. Fast forward a few more years and welcome to planet America.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I would say because both parties are filled with statist fags that want to federalize everything with a mantra of "its my way or the highway" rather than being nuanced and leaving some issues to the states or local counties and cities to deal with.

Roe v. Wade overturned does not outlaw abortion like liberals claim, it will just allow states to choose their own abortion laws so California will still have the same laws and states like Mississippi will just blanket ban it. It does give an incentive for revenue for the blue states as abortion tourists will come to California for the abortions.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Dumb
Reactions: Nano50, Chocolate Wombat and SneedEyeMitch
Upvote 0 Downvote
For some reason the reply button is disabled, so I'll go out on this: of course the government sucks and fucks up constantly. I don't think anyone is saying, "CPS and foster care are great! Never any suspicious behavior there!" Unfortunately, it's still the best we've got. Both options are bad (private donors vs. government institutions) and the latter is just slightly less bad. We should improve the systems already in place rather than depending on people with disposable income to spend it generously on random strangers. They tend to want to hang on to as much of that money as possible.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Gig Bucking Fun, Chocolate Wombat and HymanHive
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back