- Joined
- Feb 2, 2019
The main criticism with abstinence comes from the same 60s Rockefeller thinktank that came out with about 20 suggestions on how to reduce population growth, 16 of which have since become reality (longer education for women, de-emphasizing building a family in culture, making birth control and abortion as freely available as possible, career goals for women, promoted homosexuality and so on).The main criticism with abstinence is that teenagers are curious about sex anyway and not teaching them to at least wrap it before they tap it leads to a higher incidence of teen pregnancies. There is also the concern that comes from shame when it comes to sex and teenagers might be too afraid to ask their parents. Even if these teenagers are not interested in sex, they might reach adulthood and not practice safe sex when they meet someone they're interested in.
Obviously not having sex at all is the safest way to not have a child because condoms break, birth control sometimes fails, but it's not realistic when we are monkeys coked up on hormones.
In more recent examples of the same goals include ubiqutous internet porn and specific marketing attacks when things like anti-fap pops up its head.
The common folk that have embraced the idea you posit, that promotion of abstinence leads to increased teen pregnancy, whereas as promotion of birth control doesn't, seems to be to ring at least half false. Because whenever I have an in depth conversation in person with someone like that, they really seem to cheer on the idea of teens having sex together as early as possible, as the epitome of freedom and happiness.
I can't say that I didn't enjoy my own participation in this practise at the time, but looking back on it makes it a very hollow and hedonistic experience in the larger scheme of things.
Maybe there is more to this idea that's pushed from the same camp that was for free speech until they had dominance.