Zinnia Jones / Satana Kennedy / Zachary Antolak / Zack Sklar / Lauren McNamara/Soersdal / @zjemptv - Queen of the Horse Dildos and Defender of Rapists; Transtrender Posing as a Transmedicalist; Dropped out of College after Falling in a Shallow River; Balls-free since 2024

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Wait, wait, wait....wait. Is Z admitting he may have been wrong as far as the Wi Spa stuff is concerned? Or at least presumptuous?
To admit he was wrong, he'd have to admit that either a) it's a man pretending to be trans to gain access to women's spaces or b) some trans women are predatory in women's spaces. Both of those takes would piss off the trans community and would delight the TERFs.
 
It's a possibility he took bio and failed, I can see him not studying whatsoever because he's so convinced he knows it all and eating shit hard on the exams. He would never admit to it and it might be part of why he's so fucking ass blasted about everything to do with school lately.
I can't imagine anyone who thinks changing your pronouns on Twitter and then ramming a dildo up your ass magically transforms you into a woman having much of a grasp on actual biology.
 
Positron said:
He is back.
I try to get out, but they keep pulling me back. :)


1630643039101.png
1630643068594.png


Sort of trying to look female again, I see. :lit:

Positron said:
And being screencapped by Andy Ngo was, I presume, how Zach got his shinny "pedophile supporter" rep.
Hmm. Dos this count as "mainstream" media attention?

I can't imagine anyone who thinks changing your pronouns on Twitter and then ramming a dildo up your ass magically transforms you into a woman having much of a grasp on actual biology.
Isn't it supposed to be "socially constructed" or something? Rather than biological? :christine:
 
Zach: “TERFs call us autogynophiles!”

Most TERFs are savvy to Blanchard’s typology and would recognize that Zach isn’t an AGP but rather an HSTS type, though one twisted by stunted socialization and a crippling porn addiction.
I'm not actually a TERF, but I'd say that Zach is an AGP more than an HSTS. The common wisdom is that gay TiMs are HSTS while straight TiMs are AGP, but it's not always like that.

A lot of so-called AGPs aren't AGPs in the truest sense of the word meaning a man whose wires have somehow gotten crossed and redirects his desire for some women onto himself; we include sissy fetishists, exhibitionists, and lesbian fetishists in the category and these can be gay. Zach is an exhibitionist, I don't think that I'm blowing anyone's mind here when I point that out.

And I don't think that Zach is an HSTS. HSTS transition either because of homophobic trauma or because they want to attract straight men, but neither of these match Zach IMO. Not to say that Zach wouldn't be OK with being fucked by a straight guy, but I don't think that he particularly values straight men and at this point I think he prefers toys to men anyway.
 
To admit he was wrong, he'd have to admit that either a) it's a man pretending to be trans to gain access to women's spaces or b) some trans women are predatory in women's spaces. Both of those takes would piss off the trans community and would delight the TERFs.
Here is the thing, you are all acting like nudity is inherently sexual. Trans people have for awhile been falsly accused of this sort of thing for years now: https://www.transadvocate.com/why-i...ntly-dishonest-about-trans-access_n_20581.htm
And have been sexually assulted over it: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...when-schools-restrict-bathrooms-idUSKCN1SC1LR
And the TERFS are well known for their violence:

This is nothing more than a gotcha moment for you guys huh?

Why would a troon take biology, when they are convinced that everything on a biology book is transphobic trash written by white heterosexual men?
Because biology shows that Trans identity is valid: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
 
Wait, wait, wait....wait. Is Z admitting he may have been wrong as far as the Wi Spa stuff is concerned? Or at least presumptuous?
I read it as pretending he was right based on the information he had, and confirming he would make the same judgement again. He's trying to weasel out of blaming the female victim of a pedophile flasher posing as a woman.

The Wi Spa incident is a pretty clear example of a pervert pretending to be a women to get access to women he can abuse - exactly the thing people like "Zinnia" claim is just a terf fantasy. He's going to have to bend himself into pretzels to get around the problem that presents to his ideology.


Sort of trying to look female again, I see.
There's no way he walks around like that without people suppressing laughter as he walks past. No wonder he's desperate to stay home.

Zach is an AGP more than an HSTS
Seems likely. He ticks a lot of AGP boxes, and AGPs will often get involved in homosexual acts as a by-product of their fetish.

He's a narcissist who married a straight woman who pretends to be a lesbian, spends his life sticking things up his ass trying to hit the vagina he'll never have, and tries to dress like the women he wishes he could get. Textbook autogynephile.
 
Last edited:
Wait, wait, wait....wait. Is Z admitting he may have been wrong as far as the Wi Spa stuff is concerned? Or at least presumptuous?
No.



Zach clarifies his position re: the male sexual predator in Wi spa. He didn't make a mistake; he is just "updating position due to newly available information" like a good scientist. Never mind he's spent days trying to paint CubanaAngel as a liar. And don't you know that even with a proven case that a tranny creeped in women's places, it doesn't prove that trannies creeped in women's places.
21.png

dsgr.png

And you can never conclude that transsexualism is associated with sexual predatory behaviors; all you can do is to show there are countless numbers of sexual predators who so happen to be transsexuals. I don't think even Hume would approve of such causal nihilism. And if that's the lesson he took from Statistics, so much the worse for him.
rhyery.png

Like MovieBob, Zach never takes an L.
Untitled.png

etwew.png
Silly proles. Zach is right because he identifies as right. Get on with the times of Standpoint Epistemology!

sfe.png

sfe.png

sfe.png

Crossover with Mitch Slater.
Untitled.png
 
Last edited:
If it was up to Zack and his ilk, no one would ever have known about the sex offender's identity, past, or the fact that charges have been filed. Because Zack and his compatriots would never have allowed any investigation into the women's complaints in the first place.
 
Positron said:
And you can never conclude that transsexualism is associated with sexual predatory behaviors; all you can do is to show there are countless numbers of transsexuals who so happen to be sexual predators. I don't think even Hume would approve of such causal nihilism. And if that's the lesson he took from Statistics, so much the worse for him.
The problem is the set up where by "trans" == "not to be questioned".
That makes it easy for predators.

Replace "transexualism" with 'Priest" and we can see how stupid your logic is. Amazing.
What I just said also applies to priests.

Side note: Pedo tranny apologists are especially cute when they get angry. :christine:
 
Replace "transexualism" with 'Priest" and we can see how stupid your logic is. Amazing.
You probably shouldn't have ignored the second half of the paragraph you were responding to. You plainly didn't understand the point being made.

Also: transexuals are necessarily fetishists. Men pretending to be women pose an inherent danger to women. Keeping men pretending to be women out of women's facilities is as sensible now as it was when women had to fight for such facilities to be created.

Screenshot 2021-09-03 at 16.35.28.png

"Zinnia" is lying here.

Recap: the "nudes" in question were links to Zach's own photos of him stuffing dildos up his own ass - an exact behaviour Blanchard's model predicts of autogynephiles.

The context was months of "Zinnia" posting nonsense like this:

Screenshot 2021-09-03 at 17.03.38.png
Screenshot 2021-09-03 at 16.56.44.png

It was perfectly reasonable of Blanchard to point out that "Zinnia"/"Satana" is a walking demonstration of autogynephilia.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, there's a shit ton of Priests who get exposed as sexual predators. How does that disprove the notion that there are also a shit ton of tranny predators?
Ah yes because accusing trans women of using bathrooms to be perverts never turns out to be far more wrong than right: https://www.transadvocate.com/why-i...ntly-dishonest-about-trans-access_n_20581.htm
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsoc.2021.652777/full
You probably shouldn't have ignored the second half of the paragraph you were responding to. You plainly didn't understand the point being made.

I know he also said:
I don't think even Hume would approve of such causal nihilism. And if that's the lesson he took from Statistics, so much the worse for him.
Zinnia isnt the one who doesn't understand statistics. What everyone here is doing is the sharpshooter fallacy. You don't prove that the number of sex offenders who happen to be trans make up a statistically significant proportion of trans people. You start with "trans people are, as a whole, more likely to be child diddlers" and use individual reports to back load as "proof".

He also said
And don't you know that even with a proven case that a tranny creeped in women's places, it doesn't prove that trannies creeped in women's places.
Despite Zinna saying otherwise: https://mobile.twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/1433627515814391822

So it's not like we deny it, we just deny the idea that transsexualism is associated with sexual predatory behaviors. That is a poor inference made on your part.
 
Last edited:
What everyone here is doing is the sharpshooter fallacy.
Oh, look, a fallacy spotter. How unique.

It isn't sharpshooting, it's shooting fish in a barrel. You literally can't miss tranny fetishists abusing women.

You definitely didn't understand the earlier comment you were replying to. The person doing the shooting, who keeps hitting pervert trannies but wants to pretend they're uncommon, is "Zinnia Jones".

His claim that the abuse from the tranny in question was "probably nothing" is hasty generalisation. It was never justified on the evidence.

And your own fallacy is the straw man. Nobody is making the argument you claim. I'd ask you to stop lying, but I doubt you're capable.
 
Last edited:
Oh, look, a fallacy spotter. How unique.

It isn't sharpshooting, it's shooting fish in a barrel. You literally can't miss tranny fetishists abusing women.

"Zinnia's" claim that the abuse from the tranny in question was "probably nothing" is hasty generalisation. It was never justified on the evidence.

And your own fallacy is the straw man. Nobody is making the argument you claim. I'd ask you to stop lying, but I doubt you're capable.
You guys didn't have any evidence beyond a hysterically woman. That sort of evidence is more often than not wrong. And how am i making a strawman when you just said:

It isn't sharpshooting, it's shooting fish in a barrel. You literally can't miss tranny fetishists abusing women.
Except that is the hasty generalization. Do you have an exact number of the cases of trans people abusing women? Because people who say they do are usually wrong.
 
Back