Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)
- Thread starter Borscht
- Start date
- Joined
- May 25, 2014
This is an older issue than secular humanism's, it's feminism's originally. Responsibility and obligation (for women) are 4 letter words to feminists, and they have worked hard so that women don't have any. And since getting an abortion might hurt and can fuck with women's heads, they must fetishize it. To do that, they must demonize children and parenthood. It's not a baby or potential life, it's a clump of cells or a parasite. Go, cut that thing out of you girl and then go to the club, get black out drunk, PAR-TAY! You deserve it, girl. That abortion (along with gang culture) keeps the jogger population stagnate is just two evils working synergistically.
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2019
If Kamala does actually throw everyone under the bus and goes scorched earth I might gain some genuine respect for her.
I remember long ago she came out in support of the women accusing Biden of bad touching, right?
When you do that I think it says a lot more about yourself and why you "support" abortion instead of just thinking women should have the option.
I remember long ago she came out in support of the women accusing Biden of bad touching, right?
My views on abortion are actually quite complex BUT anyone that shows up to "muh abortion rights" rallies holding signs calling the unborn parasites and demons should be lined up and shot (in Minecraft in Psychonauts 2).
When you do that I think it says a lot more about yourself and why you "support" abortion instead of just thinking women should have the option.
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2019
If Kamilla torpedos the entire admin and beyond. I think her popularity would go up significantly. She'd get some respect from me at least. Self interested as she may be.
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2017
One of the things I've heard is just how expensive it is just to have a child, that the medical bills can actually bankrupt someone who would have been doing well and could have provided a moderately decent home.
Single mothers, on the other hand, routinely qualify for Medicaid, which puts the bill back on the US government.
So not only do you have the costs normally associated with a baby, you're looking at having a good chunk of money yanked out of your paycheck for a while. Of course, if she lists you on the birth certificate, even if she never lets you see the baby or tells you about it, you can expect the State to come along and want ALL their money back. From Medicaid to food stamps to welfare to braces.
The State pretty much penalizes having a family and having two parents, while subsidizing single parent households or abortions.
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2013
It’d vindicate my read on her at least; that she’s a conniving midwit that’s in way, way over her head. She’s malicious to some greater or lesser extent for sure (the shit with the prisoners and Willie Brown can’t really be washed away), but the sheer scale of shit that must be going on behind the scenes has to be horrifying for anyone that isn’t a complete psychopath.
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2020
I'm not sure Kamala would throw the entire administration under the bus to save her skin like people are speculating here. Select individuals, sure. Ruining the Dems' entire party, though? Sounds like a great way to be found in your bathroom with five self-inflicted gunshots to the back of the head.
- Joined
- May 20, 2020
Funny how seemingly everyone that poses a real threat to high level Democrats ends up committing suicide, isn't it?
- Joined
- May 3, 2019
Im not pro abortion by any means(hell you could call me mix between National socialist,strasserist,National bolshevik etcm albeit one who wants to be carefull about where to be authoritarian and not overuse it) but doesnt that mean that state would have responsibility to cover the missing wages(especially in USA with your weird system that doesnt even protect against parasites, and yet still fucks up population in neolib manner) and take care of the costs ? like if you are asking woman to carry the baby even if she used contraception and behaved responsibly, and argue that fetus is alive and thus woman should carry it in case of no fault of her own, then the costs shouldnt be factor, otherwise the costs would legit be punishment not for irresponsibility but for having sex.
Shame we dont have both gender reversable toggle conception on/off button unfortunately current procedures arent reversible.
Blake Chortles
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2020
Its not the government’s job to support you if something bad happens to you.
The government “asks” me not to kill people but they don’t give me 100 dollars every month I refrain from killing people.
That being said if you are poor having kids is usually a net increase in income.
The government “asks” me not to kill people but they don’t give me 100 dollars every month I refrain from killing people.
That being said if you are poor having kids is usually a net increase in income.
CAPTAIN HAPPY
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2021
Ya'll niggas overestimate Kamala's ability of independent thought.
This bitch will sell her soul for a snickers bar if her shadow masters tell her to. Heck, she'll do herself in for the enemy for a snicker's bar being pulled on a string because she's that fucking dull and stupid.
This bitch will sell her soul for a snickers bar if her shadow masters tell her to. Heck, she'll do herself in for the enemy for a snicker's bar being pulled on a string because she's that fucking dull and stupid.
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2018
You should move to California then, you get paid to not shoot people. $300 a month.
San Francisco will pay would-be criminals to not shoot people
San Francisco will soon pay some potential criminals $300-a-month not to shoot people.
nypost.com
San Francisco will pay would-be criminals to not shoot people
archived 4 Sep 2021 16:49:14 UTC
God of Nothing
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2016
Living in a gangsta's paradise.You should move to California then, you get paid to not shoot people. $300 a month.
San Francisco will pay would-be criminals to not shoot people
San Francisco will soon pay some potential criminals $300-a-month not to shoot people.San Francisco will pay would-be criminals to not shoot people
archived 4 Sep 2021 16:49:14 UTCarchive.ph
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2018
I'd laugh my ass off. Then when it's reciprocated onto HER, laugh even harder.
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2020
Wait I know this bitch, she was the one that whored herself out for a fucking Sonic racing game
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2020
they had this program in BaltimoreYou should move to California then, you get paid to not shoot people. $300 a month.
San Francisco will pay would-be criminals to not shoot people
San Francisco will soon pay some potential criminals $300-a-month not to shoot people.San Francisco will pay would-be criminals to not shoot people
archived 4 Sep 2021 16:49:14 UTC
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2019
Twist: She was an opponent of the Deep State all along, she just had to make it to VP position so that the Secret Service could protect her. Now she's going to blow the whole thing wide open.
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2020
The abortion side really do come off as psychopath in recent years. Years ago pro-abortion people wold acknowledge that having abortion was a sad and a hard thing to do. Now they say "you can have as many abortions as you want".
I remmber the director of plan parenthood coming out and saying "that it was good thing that we were seeing alot of fictional women on TV having abortions." Like seriously Planned Parenthood in recent years have outed them selves as psychopaths
I hope GoDaddy get's sued
Blake Chortles
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2020
If theres one thing the Religious Right was 110% correct about it was the slippery slope.
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2018
There’s a Problem in the Upper Reaches of Our Military
By Victor Davis Hanson September 02, 2021
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...f_our_military_146341.html#comments-container
There’s a Problem in the Upper Reaches of Our Military | RealClearPol…
archived 4 Sep 2021 18:27:49 UTC
It is the beginning of a never-ending bad dream. Joe Biden and the Pentagon have managed to birth a new terrorist haven, destroy much of U.S. strategic deterrence, and alienate our allies and much of the country.
In the hours after the horrific deaths of 13 service members, we have been reassured by our military that our partnership with the Taliban to provide security for our flights was wise. We were told that the terrorist victors share similar goals to ours in a hasty American retreat from Kabul. We were reminded that Afghan refugees (unlike U.S. soldiers) will not be forced to be vaccinated on arrival. Such statements are either untrue or absurd.
On the very day of the attack that killed American troops, the sergeant major of the U.S. Army reminded us in a tweet that diversity is our strength, commemorating not the dead but Women's Equality Day. If so, then is the opposite of diversity -- unity -- our weakness? Will such wokeness ensure that we do not abandon the Bagram air base in the middle of the night without opposition?
The chief of staff at the Office of Naval Intelligence warned the ONI's active duty and retired service members that they must not criticize Biden, their commander in chief, over the Afghanistan fiasco. The office correctly cited prohibitions found in the Uniform Code of Military Justice barring any disrespect shown to senior government leadership.
Indeed, a lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Marine Corps was relieved of his command for posting a video accurately blaming military and civilian leadership for the Afghanistan nightmare.
Yet until Jan. 20, retired top brass had constantly smeared their elected commander in chief with impunity.
Recently retired Gen. Michael Hayden retweeted a horrific suggestion that unvaccinated Trump supporters should be put on planes back to Afghanistan, where they presumably would be left to die. Hayden earlier had compared Trump's border facilities to Nazi death camps.(Met this cocksucker when he sported two stars. No idea how he even got two stars, much less four. Disgrace to the uniform. - JS)
Other retired high-profile military officials variously called their president an emulator of Nazi tactics, a veritable Mussolini, a liar, and deserving of removal from office sooner than later. None of these retired four-stars faced the sort of repercussions that the Office of Naval Intelligence just warned about.
More than 50 former intelligence officials on the eve of the November election signed a letter suggesting that incriminating emails found on Hunter Biden's missing laptop might be "Russian disinformation." They used their stature for political purposes to convince the American people that the story was a lie.
Retired Gen. Joseph Dunford and retired Adm. Mike Mullen recently blasted retired brass who had questioned Biden's cognitive ability. OK. But they should have issued a similar warning earlier, when the violations of fellow retired officers were even more egregious in election year 2020.
Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, apologized for doing a photo op with Trump, erroneously buying into the narrative that Trump had ordered rioters cleared from Lafayette Square for the staged picture. Worse, he leaked to journalists that he was so angry with Trump that he "considered" resigning.
Think of the irony. If Milley considered a politicized resignation to rebuke Trump over the false charge, then surely he could consider a real resignation after overseeing the worst military disaster of the last half-century in Kabul.
Milley had promised to root out white supremacy from the ranks while recommending that his soldiers read Ibram X. Kendi's racialist diatribes.
Something is terribly wrong in the ranks of America's top commanders that reflects something wrong with the country.
The Pentagon needs to stop virtue-signaling about diversity days and culturally sensitive food for Afghan refugees. Instead, can it just explain why the Bagram air base was abandoned by night, or why Taliban terrorists are our supposed "partners" in organizing our surrender and escape?
Which general allowed more than $85 billion in American weapons to fall to the Taliban -- a sum equal to the price of seven new U.S. aircraft carriers?
Who turned over to the Taliban the lists of Americans and allied Afghans to be evacuated?
Who left behind biometric devices that the Taliban are now using to hunt down our former Afghan friends?
Somehow our new woke Pentagon is hell-bent on losing the trust of the American people -- along with the wars it fights abroad.
Last edited:
FlappyBat
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Just ask these people if America should act for the benefit of Americans and you'll get all the answers you need. These people run a country whose nation they hate.
- Status