Rejected! 2021-08-31 - Isabella Loretta Janke (via attorney): A courtesy request.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

RULES OF NATURE

  • KEEP!

    Votes: 3,701 94.8%
  • DELETE!

    Votes: 202 5.2%

  • Total voters
    3,903
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Nah, when she has a whole ass category about herself you don’t just remove that

Normally I’d be the nice guy and say “yeah, we can remove it” but no no no, keep this shit the fuck up

on top of that, she’s not even a minor (shes 20 iirc) so I don’t see any good reason to remove her category
 
Keep.
8B5B9B99-7AC8-4E64-8EDB-DEFE904E2E9D.png
 
hey bella if you’re reading this, it’s not just the farms talking about you. if you’re going to go through the effort and money for these written statements, better start writing them up for twitter, instagram, etc. might take you a while though
 
Dude. Your client was being a psycho hose beast long before she caught the farms attention. All we did is complie, archive & talk about her & her fuckedupedness. You going to ask everyone/page/platform that talks about her to delete everything, a lot of it SHE posted herself? Consequences are a thing. Enjoy yours, fungus feet.
 
If she was just someone who was simply being an idiot, I would be tempted to vote yes. Like if she was just an edgelord being edgy that is one thing, but when you cross the line in actively causing harm to other people and little animals no. Boiling an animals alive, spiking your "friends", plotting to drive people into suicide, the list goes on. She seems to be a danger to the public. I am voting no.
 
however null plays it, her parents' former employer is something that should be weighed into the decision. because I am cautious I would respond that a compromise might be feasible, and as show of good faith require login like A&H while you "take the required time to consider the options" or something. then proceed to perpetually kick the can of action down the road, becoming ever harder to reach as interest in her eventually burns out as all internet stories do. I would not want to know any "sensitive health information" because the site deals only in publicly available information.
 
This is a better way to attempt to get information taken down, but I see no acknowledgement of responsibility in that letter. We didn't just pull her name out of a giant hat and decide to make fun of her. Aside from encouraging someone to rape their elderly mother and sitting on proof that it was happening, she boiled hamsters alive and is probably responsible for her dog's amputations and untimely death.


Twist in the wind, bitch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back