Rejected! 2021-08-31 - Isabella Loretta Janke (via attorney): A courtesy request.

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.

RULES OF NATURE

  • KEEP!

    Votes: 3,701 94.8%
  • DELETE!

    Votes: 202 5.2%

  • Total voters
    3,903
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
While the letter was polite, it was not an apology. A real apology involves outlining the steps you are taking to prevent such situations from ever happening again. Keep.
The letter was neither an admission (viz. apology) nor denial. Definitely a case of what the correspondence doesn't say being more powerful than what it does.
 
I love the idea that she has information that makes her sympathetic and would make people excuse her for being a miserable failure... but she doesn't want to reveal it because reasons.

She's got jack shit. Keep, but decline politely, because at least these are real lawyers and not the DMCA scammers you usually see.
 
No way! If she was an innocent person that just happened to socialise with Chris (like the Wallflower or Meagan) of course.
Bella has made her bed and she can lie in it. Even if her page from this forum is removed, people mention her on Reddit, YouTube and Facebook.
 
But i thought she wanted attention, to be a goddamn legend. What could possibly make her change her mind?! Surely this must be a mistake, i'm going to vote against deleting because she might yet again reconsider, and we don't want her to regret anything in the future, right?
 
What

what are you referring to?

i think I missed something.
Read through the first 10-15 pages. The Lawyer or someone with a remarkably same name has a history of fraud, fake legal services, alias's etc. Whole lotta skeletons in that closet.

I love that he specializes as providing specialized services to the LGBTQ community. Dude! Your clients hobby is getting trannies to an Hero themselves. Does his LGBTQ Estate planning include last rights?
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: LooseMoose and Pyra
Today I was slightly impressed because a lawyer was smart enough (previous possible history aside) to not only avoid making toothless legal threats but to explicitly disclaim any possible perceived legal threats.

This request has approximately nil chance of obtaining the results they wanted but it was still, by far, the best attempt they could have made given the nature of the situation and KF\Null.

I wonder how much it cost...
 
Aren’t you supposed to ask nicely first and then lose your shit and resort to attacks if you don’t get what you want?

She seems to have it backwards. Keep and seethe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Corn Sake
Read through the first 10-15 pages. The Lawyer or someone with a remarkably same name has a history of fraud, fake legal services, alias's etc.

So, this hasn't been either confirmed or ruled out yet?

It isn’t a great idea to make assumptions without the proof to back it up.

I’m not good at telling people apart, but there was an article about the guy charged with crimes and he looked a lot younger than the guy who had his picture on the online reputation management website.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Pee Cola
No, keep the thread. She wanted infamy and attention, she got it.
Considering how much of a horror cow she is, she fits right in our catalogue.

And just in case you are reading this, Bella; Kiwifarms isn't completely removed from google searches and Computer Engineering is one of the few areas of work where they will google and look over your internet footprint thoroughly.
Have fun in the job market you literal fungus-infested cunt.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back