reddit General

View attachment 2524410
>Black woman hears about abortion ban in texas.
>MUH GIBS
The jokes write themselves :story:
It doesn't even make sense. For example, the elderly can't get life insurance because of the outsized risk involved - does that make them non-persons according to this woman? It seems like that would necessarily follow from her logic. When did the ability to get life insurance become a crucial measure of personhood?

But I guess I shouldn't be surprised that Reddit and/or Twitter users have no practical knowledge in any domain.
 
63287A9D-AB6F-41D3-8A28-792CFA47ADB6.jpeg
 

Amazing watch. As an Awsie myself this is what my methed up neighbours sound like. He’s probably pissed off because there’d be no public transport at 12am so realistically he’d be stuck there until the morning. The only thing that didn’t quite ring true to me is the bit about crosswords. Do bogans really do crosswords?

The jokes write themselves

The nroastie mind hard at work
 
More aborticope.
cope.PNG

Let's play a game of "let's check the faggot op's profile!"
Not exactly a Trump Supporter. I am a one issue voter for lower taxes.

I support defunding the police, pro choice, gay marriage, legalization of all drugs, and anti-death penalty. While I have an opinion on these social issues, none of them affect me at all. Taxes do.

Anti-illegal immigration since 10+ million illegals put pressure on minimum wage. These people are not coming here and taking skilled jobs. And if the floor is lowered, this lowers wages for everyone, since companies are less willing to hire less than qualified applicants and train them. All for legal immigration of skilled immigrants.

Not sure what my flair would be other than "I supported Trump because I only care about one thing - lower taxes".
Created: CMV: Communism appeals only to the young and those who never pursued advanced skills

No. I am hoping you could enlighten me as to why anyone outside of the 3 groups I presented would think communism is a good idea.

First of all, you have to explain to me what version of communism these people are interested in (since high tax, free healthcare and extensive government programs ... is still just capitalism).

Then you would have to explain their motives.

Please please please CMV.
faget.PNG

in general: "centrist shit-stirrer" or in kiwi: faggot.

They still coping, and this nigger reposted it for his updoots.
cope2.PNG

this quote will never get irrelevant when anyone brings merrico in the talk:
Supporting a third world country that supports a massive portion of the world's drug trade and is infesting the US with yet another gang to own the republicans

Nigger cocksucking.
retard.PNG

when i was a young poornigger i played a game called DarkOrbit, you can't progress in this shit without paying now, before you could.
if a dev tears a game away for pure greed even under the publisher's will, they deserve to hear that, no classical "soldier following order" bullshit.

I know i shouldn't quote them fags, but reddit is going "wee epic" over them dude that lost his job after going on girls with a bikini.
fedora.PNG

so, it's allegedly a schizo, and people are "dabbing" on a schizo during his crisis? (the keyword being allegedly)
:neckbeard:
 
Last edited:
Reddit just announced this "new" feature called "Disruptive Comment Collapsing" [A].
The disruptive comment collapsing feature is an experiment that gives redditors more control over their Reddit experience by giving them the option to limit content that’s potentially disruptive. Currently, this is just an experiment and isn’t a permanent feature, so you may not have access to this feature.

Oh, okay. That's pretty vague. So what the fuck is this thing and how is this different to burying comments by downvoting? Oh... well... you know. Using bots to determine if a comment is wrongthink or not. It's not like bots have ever been wrong or abused for political posturing on said website.
What's considered to be potentially disruptive?

Comments are identified as “potentially disruptive” by a mix of signals, including sentiment analysis, and could include abusive or hateful language, insults, and threats. There’s subjectivity when it comes to sentiment analysis, which is why we’re giving redditors control over what suits them best. Redditors can also choose to not turn the setting on at all and keep their experience as it is today.

How long until it's proven Reddit is using this "experiment" to censor controversial topics from the normies like how shadowbanning was?
 
I am absolutely loving opening reddit, and seeing r/pics upvoting more Texas abortion posts featuring phrases like, "My Body, My Choice," and, "Bodily Autonomy is a Human Right." Funny how bodily autonomy is fucking awesome when it comes to abortions, but when it comes to, geez, I don't know, vaccines, suddenly it becomes, "fuck your bodily autonomy reeeeeeeeeeee." And the reasoning is always, "well, actually, that's because not getting the vaccine harms other people," and like, okay, but that's exactly what the argument against abortion is. That fetus is a person, and abortion harms them. Pick a fucking side, reddit. Of course, this is all assuming actual people are involved in this, when it's probably just agenda-bots
 
I don't really use reddit anymore and I never used the default subs, so I'm a bit out of the loop on this one, why is her post in the White People Twitter sub? Did this woman not vote for Biden or something?
Most of any vaguely open subreddit is nothing but left wing political shilling. They'll ban you for pointing out black people or AOC tweets aren't white.
 
Didn’t at some point the majority of women in the US especially feminists were against abortion? I read somehere that a bunch of businessmen came up with the topic of abortion and wanted feminist groups to promote it for some reason, or is that complete bullshit?
I don't know about that but despite media kikes whining about white male incels the pro life community is overwhelmingly female. Go to any pro life march or protest and it's 75% women.
 
I don't know about that but despite media kikes whining about white male incels the pro life community is overwhelmingly female. Go to any pro life march or protest and it's 75% women.
Well yea, it makes sense for the so called "sexually liberated modern man" to support abortion as it give him an out from becoming a father.
 
Didn’t at some point the majority of women in the US especially feminists were against abortion? I read somehere that a bunch of businessmen came up with the topic of abortion and wanted feminist groups to promote it for some reason, or is that complete bullshit?
You're probably thinking of the 1960s sexual revolution. Many free-love hippies and feminists at the time supported contraception, the right to choose, and such. Not all, and not all women, but many. There was a lot of pushback against the stricter culture of the 40s and 50s. Feminism in the early 1900s was more concerned with women having equal legal rights and the right to vote.

Today feminism is in two distinct camps of radical feminists and leftist feminists. Radfems generally don't support promiscuity, or sex work, or anything that is seen as enabling whoredom, and they don't support transwomen and are called TERFS. Leftist feminists are basically the SJWs, and probably eat up whatever is the latest political trend that CNN is pushing.
 
Imagine admiting that you did have a life inside of you and instead of crying and being disgusted that you killed it, you argue that you have no obligation to not kill it. Reddit is truly the only place where you can say you're okay with baby murder (I mean, the post is the person saying it's a life) and be upvoted.

I remember years back people were starting to say a fetus was a parasite. I suspect the next thing will be that the fetus is raping the mother. I've seen redditors saying this
 
  • Like
Reactions: NickGer and Tealeaf
It doesn't even make sense. For example, the elderly can't get life insurance because of the outsized risk involved - does that make them non-persons according to this woman? It seems like that would necessarily follow from her logic. When did the ability to get life insurance become a crucial measure of personhood?

But I guess I shouldn't be surprised that Reddit and/or Twitter users have no practical knowledge in any domain.
Well.. hate to break it but..
Shes a law professor1631324632821.png
This is pretty typical of the modern left-right split. Where lefties are intellectuals with ideas without any basis in reality. While rightwingers are grounded in reality but some go off in to the "sience denier" direction.
 
Is it really a normal thing for teenagers to (however ephemerally) want to be the opposite gender, as this woman is implying?

I'll fully admit I was a socially-oblivious turbo autist at that age, but while I certainly didn't want to become a tranny, it's not as if I had some deep, abiding desire to become a man and do manly things or be seen as exhibiting masculine characteristics either.

I was too preoccupied with Counter-Strike at 14 to have any interest in my "personal identity" or other such nebulous concepts.
 
Back