Careercow Andrew Dobson (aka Tom Preston)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Actually, the legality of fan art is highly questionable. The only reason it isn't pursued more often is that it is rather stupid for a company to prosecute copyright infringement for something that isn't even costing them any money, and in the process, infuriates their most dedicated fans, that is, the very people who promote their actual IP and buy tons of it.

Fan art, like any other derivative work, has to pass the fair use test to be noninfringing, and that is whether it is commercial or it isn't. Whether a derivative work is commercial is only directly relevant to one of the four factors of the fair use test. The test balances these: "the purpose and character of your use, the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount and substantiality of the portion taken, and the effect of the use upon the potential market." http://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/four-factors/#sthash.iLQc2TaP.dpuf

Many fan works are, definitely, transformative enough, that is, they have enough original content, that they wouldn't fail on that part, but because fair use is a multi-factor balancing test, commercial exploitation of them would make it more likely that they wouldn't pass.

There isn't a bright line rule on it, though, and a minimally transformative "fan art" piece could easily be infringing with or without commercial motive.

It's more a matter of letting it slide than that there is any explicit protection of fan art.

In this case, with stuff grabbed from Google Images being used in a shopfront sign (a very bad practice by the way), both the original owners of Crash Bandicoot and the fan art guy have a legitimate legal claim against whoever made that sign and is using it for commercial purposes.

I just think it's kind of douchey actually to do it while being on somewhat questionable legal ground yourself. The damages in a copyright claim are generally monetary. That is, this guy would be claiming he would otherwise be making money off someone else's IP had it not been diverted into the pockets of this sign guy.

It's very similar to the Blue Balled Bear's whining about people using his own shitty art to criticize him and complaining about it being "stolen."

The legality of fan art is questionable only if its intended purpose is plagiarize, diminish, supplant, bersmirch, or take profit away form the original copyright holder. Most fan art is done as a sincere display of the artist's love and admiration for the characters being rendered in said fan art. Copyright law is there to protect the copyright holder from real insidious uses and plagiarization of original work such as piracy, forgery or missappropiation.

Any fan artist that produces a piece of art as a means to say "I love this" and do so for free are completely in the clear because copyright law wasn't meant to dissuade people from expressing such sentiments. As you state, there is the "fair use" doctrine to allow for such wiggle room. Nitro's (Ben Hickling) fan art of Coco Bandicoot is transformative just by the very fact that he renders the character in a manner that is different from the games and because it is in a different medium. Coco Bandicoot is a 3D character in a videogame, an interactive digital medium, Nitro's is a pictoric 2D painting or illustration. A copyright claim could be filed against Nitro if he were producing a videogame with Coco Bandicoot as a playable character that he would be selling it for profit.

I'm not sure what exactly was the image that was plagiarized (something with a cat) so I don't have enough info to know to whom it would correspond to make the corresponding claim.

I would have to disagree that this situation is in any way similar to Dobson's loathsome moaning. As you stated before, "fair use" plays a big role when it comes to such transformative works and "criticism, review and parody" are some of the best examples of "Fair use" because this fall within freedom of speech. Just as two or more people can freely discuss and speak about Crash Bandicoot, review it and parody it, so an fan artist can express freely his thoughts and ideas with art instead of words.

Dobson claiming that someone is "stealing" his art for the mere act of posting it online, as is, without modification or misappropriation just shows how little he understands "fair use" especially when more often than not, his art is posted in forums like this precisely for the expressed purpose of review, critique and parody.

My apologies to the forum mods if this post is mostly off-topic.
 
Game of Thrones is "problematic" cause the show about a medieval fantasy setting depicted a rape scene. Once.
Thank FemJesus for Feminists to point out to us where something goes "over the line". People getting burned alive, stabbed, their limbs cut off, poisoned, their manhoods lopped off, drowned, mauled by bears, tortured... that's all fine, but that one scene with Sansa and the show is suddenly "Shitlord scum" or whatever these clowns call shows that dare not being "PROGRESSIVE" enough.
And obviously, it's so bad that the magnificent performance Peter Dinklage put forth with his (spot- on) depiction of Tyrion Lannister completely vanishes and becomes irrelevant in light of the biggest of crimes the world has to offer: fictional violence (in a setting revolving around violence, no less) against fictional women.

It's pretty funny because the actress who played Sansa stated she enjoyed the scene when Ramsey raped Sansa....
 
Another post to Patreon. This time it's a comic he drew over two years ago. But he only drew it, didn't write it.

image.jpeg


Distractify
Published 4 hours ago

WAY back in 2013 I was hired by the newly created website http://Distractify.com to make a comic infograph about the then upcoming console wars. It was written by 2 guys and I provided the illustrations. It took many months to make, and because of it's large size it crashed my computer many times.


However, since I made it.... I never saw it go up. So I've been waiting for a time when it would be ok to post it. I think 2 1/2 years since I made it is long enough for an out of date comic, don't you think? lol


So enjoy this blast from the past! And remember, I didn't write this, just drew it.
 
Another post to Patreon. This time it's a comic he drew over two years ago. But he only drew it, didn't write it.

View attachment 50706

Distractify
Published 4 hours ago

WAY back in 2013 I was hired by the newly created website http://Distractify.com to make a comic infograph about the then upcoming console wars. It was written by 2 guys and I provided the illustrations. It took many months to make, and because of it's large size it crashed my computer many times.


However, since I made it.... I never saw it go up. So I've been waiting for a time when it would be ok to post it. I think 2 1/2 years since I made it is long enough for an out of date comic, don't you think? lol


So enjoy this blast from the past! And remember, I didn't write this, just drew it.

That was fucking joyless.
 
Another post to Patreon. This time it's a comic he drew over two years ago. But he only drew it, didn't write it.

View attachment 50706

Distractify
Published 4 hours ago

WAY back in 2013 I was hired by the newly created website http://Distractify.com to make a comic infograph about the then upcoming console wars. It was written by 2 guys and I provided the illustrations. It took many months to make, and because of it's large size it crashed my computer many times.


However, since I made it.... I never saw it go up. So I've been waiting for a time when it would be ok to post it. I think 2 1/2 years since I made it is long enough for an out of date comic, don't you think? lol


So enjoy this blast from the past! And remember, I didn't write this, just drew it.
Huh, a comic where he isn't fellating nintendo. Paint bucket me suprised
 
Its like everything dobbie learned about gender and interaction between them came from CWCS Date-Ed classes.
Dobby sure is sounding like him, if he was like Chris and didn't censor himself I'd fully expect Dobby to be coming out as a GAAAAAAAYBIAN, a male lesbian.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back