Cultcow Russell Greer / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,449 55.9%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 283 10.9%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 607 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,594
That might cause some confusion with his current title of "former current legal assistant."

View attachment 2523477

(Sorry for reposting, these are just too damn funny.)
“Are there any hot lawyers?”
This wh*toid is a fucking speak and spell. I dunno, Russ, I guess there are one or two.
 
I'm sure there are many "hot" lawyers of both sexes all around the world. Russ is neither hot, nor a lawyer, but he desperately wishes he was both.

Being a paralegal is almost as good as the real thing, and other than his face, Russ is a 9/10. So unless you're a bigot who hates the disabled, you're going to ignore his hideous face, so he's basically a 9/10 lawyer.

I wouldn't be surprised if this was really his thought process.
 
Being a paralegal is almost as good as the real thing, and other than his face, Russ is a 9/10. So unless you're a bigot who hates the disabled, you're going to ignore his hideous face, so he's basically a 9/10 lawyer.
He's said being a paralegal is like being a lawyer except for a few things, and he even tried to represent someone (against her will) in his brothel suit. The judge removed the person (she was a sex worker at one of Hoff's brothels) because she didn't give permission for Russ to include her, and since he's not a lawyer, he can't represent anyone himself. But yeah, he thinks that he's a legal genius because he has a paralegal degree from bottom barrel business school, and he thinks he knows more about the law than judges. In his Taylor Swift book, he tells of a conversation he had with a lawyer who basically shoots down all his arugements. Since it doesn't paint him in a flattering light, I'm inclined to think that conversation happened. At the end of the conversation, he tells the lawyer he doesn't even want to sue Taylor, and the lawyer asks why he's in his office then. Apparently, no one at the Dollar Tree Paralegal school explained you can't sue people to get their attention. You have to have a legitimate dispute and he didn't (and doesn't) have one.
 
Last edited:
Being a paralegal is almost as good as the real thing, and other than his face, Russ is a 9/10. So unless you're a bigot who hates the disabled, you're going to ignore his hideous face, so he's basically a 9/10 lawyer.

I wouldn't be surprised if this was really his thought process.
E: i take that back, no team of any kind would have russ.

I do love the idea though, that Russ essentially thinks he and Skordas have “basically” the same job.
 
"Per the rule, an attorney should not accept representation that will cause a conflict of interest."

There's no conflict of interest Russ! You're literally arguing that Josh and Skordas' interests align you dummy.

Does Russ just not think about what the words he's saying actually mean? (no, he doesn't)
He just saw there's a rule, it involves "conflict of interest," so he treats these as magic words such that he just has to chant them like a spell and the court has to do what he says.
 
He just saw there's a rule, it involves "conflict of interest," so he treats these as magic words such that he just has to chant them like a spell and the court has to do what he says.
He's almost a SovCit in the regard. He did the same thing with "duty" with Taylor Swift even though the judge explained his understanding of duty was wrong. But of course, Russ can't be wrong so the judge was. So even thought Null can hire whatever lawyer he wants, Russ will rage that Skordas is breaking the rules. I have little doubt that after this suit gets dismissed, Russ is gonna either sue Skordas, or try to get him disbarred, or both. Now, Russ is a gnat and Skordas is an industrial strength bug zapper, but I'd like to think his tolerance will wear out and he'll sue Russ for harassment or defamation just to shut down further attempts to harass him.
 
This ties into what his old boss said. Russ can't stand being corrected or criticized. He views it as a personal attack, which is why we're big meanies!
We could get a nice glimpse of this during that videoconference during his Erika harrasment court, as the judge and Russ' lawyer were talking and Russ was silently, droolingly seething. Pure impotent mongoloid rage as the trauma lumps were pulsating and trying to rewrite reality to the version that he would later type online with his stubby sausagefingers.
 
We could get a nice glimpse of this during that videoconference during his Erika harrasment court, as the judge and Russ' lawyer were talking and Russ was silently, droolingly seething. Pure impotent mongoloid rage as the trauma lumps were pulsating and trying to rewrite reality to the version that he would later type online with his stubby sausagefingers.
Oh yeah, he was livid. I wonder how his lawyer kept him from "trying to explain" and convicting himself. You know he was just aching to try and talk his way out of it and that stupid lawyer wouldn't let him!
 
We could get a nice glimpse of this during that videoconference during his Erika harrasment court, as the judge and Russ' lawyer were talking and Russ was silently, droolingly seething. Pure impotent mongoloid rage as the trauma lumps were pulsating and trying to rewrite reality to the version that he would later type online with his stubby sausagefingers.
That video is fascinating. He has no facial expressions yet he did angry so hard we could see it.
 
Yeah, this is the usual "but if you'd JUST let me EXPLAIN..." from him.

His explanation never changes anything. It's not even so much a stalling tactic as it's a bullying tactic. You don't agree with him so he's going to explain you until you do, because obviously you're wrong because he's right.
And it's infuriating because all he ever does is explain. He says he never gets to tell his side of the story but his side is all we ever hear.
 
He's almost a SovCit in the regard. He did the same thing with "duty" with Taylor Swift even though the judge explained his understanding of duty was wrong. But of course, Russ can't be wrong so the judge was. So even thought Null can hire whatever lawyer he wants, Russ will rage that Skordas is breaking the rules. I have little doubt that after this suit gets dismissed, Russ is gonna either sue Skordas, or try to get him disbarred, or both. Now, Russ is a gnat and Skordas is an industrial strength bug zapper, but I'd like to think his tolerance will wear out and he'll sue Russ for harassment or defamation just to shut down further attempts to harass him.

He's more like a First Amendment Frauditor. SovCits focus on "I'm not driving, I'm tRaVeLlInG!" and shit from Black's Law dictionary and the gold fringe on the flag. And while Russell DEFINITELY would benefit from a regular P. Barnes-ing (on camera, in meatspace, not Mincraft), he:

* Probably hovers around spaces/people, breathing like the sex offender he is, looking creepy
* When called on it, says he "has business to conduct here," buys ONE STAMP as his toilet scrubber check allows
* Does string Harry Potter-esque incantations around trying to see what "OPEN SUCK--IME!" will result in getting his way
* Probably engages regularly in Glenn Cerio school of threatening mutual combat, them tinkling in his Salvation Army frayed hem Dockers and hobbling away
* Cites law (like poster 7) completely and utterly WRONG--lies frequently through omission and obfuscation
 
He sees a judge as the special Ed teacher that gave him an A that one time: a benevolent proctor who will reward him for creative "outside the box thinking". Unfortunately Josh can't be forced to pay damages because Russ "applied himself".
The problem is that law is very boring and your argument absolutely must be "in the box." If the judge describes your argument as "creative" or "novel," it is not a compliment.
 
The problem is that law is very boring and your argument absolutely must be "in the box." If the judge describes your argument as "creative" or "novel," it is not a compliment.
I wonder if any judges moonlight as law professors and pass Russ's filings around as prime examples of how NOT to do it.

And it's infuriating because all he ever does is explain. He says he never gets to tell his side of the story but his side is all we ever hear.
We heard enough of Erika's side to know he was lying about stopping if she asked him to. She told him several time to leave her alone and he didn't. He doesn't grasp that's why he was going to be convicted if it went to trial. He was convinced he would be acquitted if he could just, wait for it, EXPLAIN. Hell, he wrote a letter to the prosecutor detailing what he did and said towards her and tried to explain that wasn't harassment. He thought because HE didn't think it was harassment, he couldn't be held accountable for it.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if any judges moonlight as law professors and pass Russ's filings around as prime examples of how NOT to do it.
I took Evidence from an adjunct who was a trial court judge. He didn't pass around bad motions, but he did tell stories about weird situations.

The problem with Russ is that his stuff is so wrong that you can't even teach from it.
 
I wonder if any judges moonlight as law professors and pass Russ's filings around as prime examples of how NOT to do it.
The Canadian judge who wrote the brilliant opinion in Meads v. Meads certainly followed these nutcases assiduously and the opinion is practically a primer on these arguments and why they are wrong.
 
The problem is that law is very boring and your argument absolutely must be "in the box." If the judge describes your argument as "creative" or "novel," it is not a compliment.
The problem is no lawyer has been smart or brave enough to try what russell has yet. Obviously most lawyers just suffer from a lack of creativity and judges are all bias.
 
Back