- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
I didn't want to know what kind of women Jake jostles to, but here we are.
Secret Gamer Girl / SecretGamerGrrl / Googleshng / "Violet Hargrave" / Jacob Lawrence (Jake) Alley / Violet Cassandra Ocean - Delusional Zoe Quinn Stalker, Libelous Tweeter, Thirsty Gnome, Faux-Tranny Neckbeard Incel, Micropenis, "Known Troubled Person", Creator of "Massive vs the Masses", Self-Described "Noise Making Thing"; Lives in Niantic, CT
- Thread starter chimpburgers
- Start date
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2018
Some other troon a couple of days ago - I think Charles Clymer - mentioned troons being murdered at record levels this year. Again, no cite - it's just something that's presumed to be true. It's undoubtedly bullshit, but then they always act like if a troon is murdered the motive was them being a troon. I remember Andy Ngo going through every troon murder in the US, for I either 2019 or 2020, and pointing out that unlike these middle-class white men REEEEEEEing about victimhood these were all POC, very poor, mostly hookers involved with drugs and other criminal activities, and a few weren't even necessarily trans. When the police knew a motive, none of them were killed for being trans - the closest was there were a couple that may have been guilty of the pickle surprise on a john. All known perpetrators were other POC, and their murder rate was far below that of any other group, and remained below even if you adjusted the percentage of troons down towards a more realistic amount. Hell, reading between the lines, most if not all of the victims weren't autistic AGPs like Jake and Charles, they were former gay men.
tl;dr: Jake's full of shit. But not only all troons, but all SJWs, are full of shit on this topic. The victimhood is the truth, no matter what reality says.
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2016
Even among the murdered black street walking trannies in the US the majority of killers were their partners and that majority was still less than ten people iirc. Plus, the guy that lives with/off a street walking tranny might not be representing the actions and decisions of the average man.
Numbah #1 killer of troons: people that are into troons. This would also explain the suicides.
Numbah #1 killer of troons: people that are into troons. This would also explain the suicides.
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2020
Trannies are so oppressed that they would never say or post anything inappropriate
But also every fucking time they do say or post something inappropriate it's just gallows humor because they are so oppressed
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2016
Hey, they made a game for Violet: Hindsight 20/20 - Wrath of the Rakshasha
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
Moar JKR sperging:
https://twitter.com/SecretGamerGrrl/status/1436434384140312623 (Archive)
Also, Jake whining about the fact that nobody likes him:
https://twitter.com/SecretGamerGrrl/status/1436446952590397441 (Archive)
https://twitter.com/SecretGamerGrrl/status/1436434384140312623 (Archive)
Also, Jake whining about the fact that nobody likes him:
https://twitter.com/SecretGamerGrrl/status/1436446952590397441 (Archive)
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
You would have no dollars because this is not a thing that has ever happened. Let alone a thousand times.
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2015
Anyone think that his eating babies metaphor is getting a little tired and kind of, I don't know, telling?
I mean, we know Jake hates women, because that's what he wants to be and can never be, and thusly hates babies too, as they demonstrate the reproductive potential that genuine women have and he doesn't, but does he have to go into specifics, like what kind of bread the baby sandwich would be on?
I guess he thinks it's funny, he thinks he's showing how ridiculous it is by demonstrating a stupid extreme situation, reductio ad absurdum, but it just comes off like Jake thinks a lot about the various sorts of bread that you could put a baby on.
It doesn't come off the way he wants it to, it just makes him seem insane, and like he has no normal social interactions, for people to look at him and say "Oh, don't use that as a metaphor".
I mean, we know Jake hates women, because that's what he wants to be and can never be, and thusly hates babies too, as they demonstrate the reproductive potential that genuine women have and he doesn't, but does he have to go into specifics, like what kind of bread the baby sandwich would be on?
I guess he thinks it's funny, he thinks he's showing how ridiculous it is by demonstrating a stupid extreme situation, reductio ad absurdum, but it just comes off like Jake thinks a lot about the various sorts of bread that you could put a baby on.
It doesn't come off the way he wants it to, it just makes him seem insane, and like he has no normal social interactions, for people to look at him and say "Oh, don't use that as a metaphor".
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2014
Zach won’t let you fuck him, Jake. No one will.
Who are these people? Where are they getting these lists? What benefit do they get from this bizarre and paranoid scenario? But I think my favourite aspect is the “baby-eating, puppy-kicking” bit. No, Jake, no one thinks you do those things, they just think you’re a boring, needy, helpless asshole.
I have no idea what the fuck he’s talking about in the last couple of tweets.
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Baby sandwiches are probably healthier than what Jake actually eats.
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2018
If someone is accused of doing something awful, there will be evidence, up to and including the person admitting they did something awful and acting like it's no big deal. Otherwise, you HAVE to be Jake's friend.
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2015
We're your biggest fans, Jake. We're your fans forever and ever.
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2020
The entire attempt to go after JK Rowling has been retarded and deranged from start to finish, but the thing with her accidentally posting “I love this truly fabulous Ickabog, with it bat ears, mismatched eyes and terrifying bloodstained teeth! In court, Wolf claimed the Facebook post in which he’d said he wanted to ‘fuck up some TERFs’ was just ‘bravado.’ #TheIckabog” was especially deranged and DARVO. It's obvious that she meant to paste a link there and forgot that she had copied a quote from an article. It's an innocent mistake that any of us could make and I bet all of us have* at one point or another. Any good faith portrayal of events would acknowledge that.
But no, that wasn't enough for these fucking lunatics. They are trying to portray it as JK Rowling just randomly cursing at a child and not mentioning the fact that the vulgarity comes from a trans activist who she is quoting. It's such a dishonest tactic, but all of the "news" that covered it seemed completely willing to go along with it without question. Here's an example (archived so they don't get the clicks).
*I just almost did it when inserting the link, I accidentally almost put the text of Rowling's tweet as the URL
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
CON is now a "think tank" and Jake wrote a "massive report" how all of Twitter's problems came from 12 accounts:
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2018
To be fair to Jake, probably the most famous example of satire is 'A Modest Proposal', where Jonathan Swift suggests the starving Irish should eat their babies and also sell them as food to alleviate their problems. So eating babies is a classic example of using hyperbole to (attempt to) be satirical. It's also worth noting that he never says they're accused of being card-carrying NAZI GAMERGATERS, because when he and troons like him are accused of malfeasance it's clearly the most ridiculous thing, like eating babies. But his enemies are all literal Nazis in their millions, a group which totally exists in those numbers expressly because they hate Jake, and also other troons, so much.
(Why yes, @AirdropShitposts posts Jake claiming that 90% of all harassment came from a dozen accounts, which seems incompatible with millions of Nazis stalking him on Twitter. But that level of double-think is ground floor for Jake.)
The real problem though, is that in SJW circles satire isn't acceptable because it still says The Bad Things even if it's to mock them. His very good friend Arthur Chu has even written about it (one example). So Jake is, in fact, encouraging baby-eating and puppy-kicking every time he uses those suggestions, because in the minds of SJWs it's both equally harmful to anyone who has been a victim of those crimes to see them referenced, and also the general populace are such idiots/autists that they can't understand mockery, sarcasm and irony and will take it at face value, either consciously or subconsciously.
Poor Jake. If anyone bothered to read his bullshit he might have another whisper campaign on his hands. After all, he's encouraging eating babies. Babies!
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
I once had to explain to an outraged SJW that an article literally titled "A Modest Proposal" was, in fact, satire. Not only had they never read the original, heard of it, or heard of Jonathan Swift, but the whole concept still eluded them even after being explained.Next Task said:
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2014
“This is not a direct quote I should note.” Someone needs to explain how libel works to Jake.
Last edited:
Wallace
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2015
Remember folks, transgenderism may have a phenomenally high suicide rate, but we can't hope to maintain that level of excellence if everyone doesn't do their part.
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2016
It's an odd thing to note for the gnome and it's not the first time he's done it. With his earlier telling it seemed to have been something CHELSAY! was relaying from being said at the twitter meeting - that he was practically a part of even if he was at the wrong coast and not invited.
Is he pointing out that it's not a direct quote because Quinn's a liar that can't be trusted or is he pointing out that it's not a direct quote because Quinn's a liar and during her retelling of what went down she did the familiar Jake-style flim-flam of "they pretty much said..."?
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
Jakeconomics: NFTs (and some more bitcoin) and then arguing with people who reply:
