US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?

 

[Gehenna]

I don't expect that China intends to attack the USA, so much as to keep us out of whatever they really intend to start an attack.
If they wanted to hurt Americans, all they have to do is stop selling to us and use their factory workers in the army instead.
Then say bye bye Taiwan.

Not that simple, actually. You see, if they stop selling to us their whole economy collapses. When it comes to the U.S. and China, imagine two one-legged giants leaning against each other. If either one falls or stops selling/buying from the other, they go with them.

 

[ChefKiss]

Everything China is doing is not to prepare for war against america, it's to take america out of the picture as it goes about the wars it wants.
So America wouldn't do anything as they took back Hong Kong
So America will step aide and let them take the middle east.
So America wont do anything as they take Taiwan etc etc

China will just corrupt and subvert America while it steamrolls smaller countries. Attacking America only comes when they have the resources and strategic locations to do it

 

[Blackhole]

I guess what I'm asking is what they intend to do with that power once they have it?

Suck nigger cock and dress up as women without having those dang dirty trolls interfere or make fun of them.

 

[Gehenna]

I mean, I get that they want power, but you don't just go looking for power for nothing. You usually seek it to accomplish some end, or is this like in 1984 where ENGSOC wanted power purely for power's sake?

I guess what I'm asking is what they intend to do with that power once they have it?

It's power for the sake of power. They don't have a grand vision, at least none they have ever presented... anywhere, they simply desire the power. They got a taste of it as they grew and grew and want more.

 

[DuckSucker]

View attachment 2540363


https://trendingpolitics.com/biden-...ls-back-in-horror-crugg/?utm_source=economics

Biden you cant just go around kissing whoever you want I dont care who you are thats basically grabbing them by the pussy. The most you could do is maybe a side hug holding a red solo cup.

Because America is probably the most hostile place to invade, massively outguns China, vastly outranges it. Leaving aside a ground invasion of the U.S. would be horrifically hostile, we don't need good generals to simply sink every single one of their landing ships with a navy five times their size. It'd be suicide. But let's ignore that and compound it, China is entirely economically reliant on the U.S., its exports to us makeup 18% of its -entire economy-. Losing that would cripple it -overnight-. Mind, it'd fucking hurt us too, but in a war situation, we can take that hit for a longer time than they can, as in it would take us at least a couple of months to feel it bad enough to grind us to a halt.

But lets compound this more.

Declaring war on the U.S. and bringing to bare the sheer arms necessary to do so would leave China with fuck and all to defend itself. India and Russia both are hostile parties to China and China to them. Think they'll be nice and quiet?

Declaring war on the U.S. would destroy china in four separate ways. And only one is militarily by us.

All this discounting the fact that I think they would rather own the US and have a leash on it rather than destroy it and 'win'. I think they openly said as much in that meeting with Biden in Alaska--that they know they will never outgun the US, a nation willing to go into massive, hundred years worth of debt to military industry companies and mercenaries and shit to 'win' in a war over some sleight, but they know how to fight economically. Basically that thing about the west plays chess but the east plays go.

I think we're past the point of wars for moral victory and patriotism (even land ownership).

 

[tehpope]

View attachment 2542838
“There's lots of evidence that gas prices should be going down but they haven't, we’re taking a close look at that.”

GEE, COULD IT BE THAT YOU CANCELLED THE KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE THAT MADE US ENERGY INDEPENDENT AND FORCED US TO RELY ON ECO-UNFRIENDLY OIL TANKERS TO COME ACROSS THE OCEAN TO GIVE US OIL!?!?!?!?! GEEEEEEE, THE ALMONDS ARE REALLY ACTIVATED ON THIS ONE JOE BUDDY OLD PAL. BECAUSE YOU WANTED TO GIVE BUSINESSS TO YOUR PAL WARREN BUFFET TO USE HIS TRAINS TO BRING OIL ACROSS AMERICA.

 

[Gehenna]

To be clear, the Admin defending Milly and the whole "new Security Agreement" are unconnected. They defended Milley because burying the event to avoid scandal isn't an option with the democrat civil war going, and you never, ever fire someone for a misdeed if you can avoid it. It's a blatant admission they fucked up and a free attack on you from then on it. They don't defend Milly because of anything to do with China, they defend him because they -have- to, its the only play politically.

As for the new intelligence operation. Still processing on this, but it looks... actually anti-Chinese which is interesting. Why and to what extent is unclear, but it's separate from Milley for sure.

 

[Takayuki Yagami]

The RINOs will do what they have always done, be in it for themselves. They are interested solely in what benefits them and will only participate when it does so. Hence why the infrastructure bill has so many kickbacks to them, and hence why they all have been very silent on it when it began to fail. They are fair-weather friends to the core.

Let me clarify further then. How is their relationship with their base compared to the DNC branch of the Establishment/Uniparty with the progressive base?

 

[Vyse Inglebard]

View attachment 2543015

Special counsel probing Trump-Russia investigation charges lawyer with making false statement to FBI - Breaking911

WASHINGTON – (AP) — The prosecutor tasked with examining the U.S. government’s investigation into Russian election interference charged prominent cybersecurity lawyer Michael Sussmann of the Perkins Coie law firm with making a false statement to the FBI. The prosecutor examining the U.S...

t.co

Special counsel probing Trump-Russia investigation charges lawyer wit…

archived 16 Sep 2021 20:53:31 UTC

archive.md

The case against the attorney, Michael Sussmann of the Perkins Coie law firm, is just the second prosecution brought by special counsel John Durham in two-and-a-half years of work. Yet neither case brought by Durham undoes the core finding of an earlier investigation by Robert Mueller that Russia had interfered in sweeping fashion on behalf of Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign and that the Trump campaign welcomed that aid.

"D-D-D-DRUMPF STILL CHEATED THOUGH! IMPEEEEEEACH!" All the while ignoring the ACTUAL cheating Sleepy Joe and his cabal did to get into office.

 

[Tree]

View attachment 2542925

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1438601897498271750

Enough. Someone with authority give the command to stop their vertical activities, starting with the failures currently in charge of guarding our borders. If your men won't do it, deputize citizens who will. There are plenty, growing daily.

 

[Gehenna]

Let me clarify further then. How is their relationship with their base compared to the DNC branch of the Establishment/Uniparty with the progressive base?

Ah, well... Romney damn near got ousted out of the party on what was meant to be a purely symbolic vote, Liz Cheney got ousted from her leadership position and his being primaried, and every other RINO who voted for impeachment is looking at a hard primary fight in their respective elections.

So in short, the RINOs are kinda fucked.

Establishment positions are largely secure due to being in areas that can't be primaried easily. Hence why they are in leadership roles. So the two don't quite compare. The most vulnerable one was Pelosi's successor, and he already got ousted.

 

[The High Prophet of Truth]

Enough. Someone with authority give the command to stop their vertical activities, starting with the failures currently in charge of guarding our borders. If your men won't do it, deputize citizens and we will.

I'm pretty sure they were asking for civilian volunteers at one point,

 

[Billy Beer]

An attack on a country doesn't have to be boots on the ground, boats on the sea and nukes in the air. For 2 decades and more, almost every country has openly said that the battlefield is now cyber, and we are fighting cyberwars with major nations.

That doesn't mean hacking a pipeline, disrupting facebook or stealing bitcoin. It is about psychologically subverting an entire nation, so that its' citizens turn on the host nation.

If people knew how easy it is to psychologically manipulate, to an extreme degree, the average human, the internet would be burned to the ground tomorrow. Napolean Boneparte said "Four hostile newspapers are more to be feared than a thousand bayonets". 4 billion people own a device that make 4 hostile newspapers look like a scribbling on a fag-packet.

 

[Mr Cuddles]

https://twitter.com/kelliwardaz/status/1438597001168359432

Any thoughts Gehenna (or anyone else really) what to expect from this?

 

[Gehenna]

View attachment 2543131
https://twitter.com/kelliwardaz/status/1438597001168359432

Any thoughts Gehenna (or anyone else really) what to expect from this?

Unsure, they have tightened down on their information security since the initial leaks a while back. S'far as I know, nobody knows.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

Wrong. You could generally, sort of put them under the umbrella of socialism. Soviet style and classic Marxist ideology is explicitly global and destructivist with regards to identity. National socialism is, you guessed it, limited to the national boundaries of geography and ethnicity. A national socialist utopia would be every nation having its own unique character but sharing the mission to serve their own citizens first. A Soviet/Marxist ideal is all borders and identifiers subsumed completely into the class dialactic.

If this is true, why did Hitler bother to invade Russia? Or France, for that matter?

 

[MrJokerRager]

View attachment 2542925

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1438601897498271750

When I think about it, the character of Robert De Niro in one of the Machete movies pwning illegal border hoppers was righteous and based.

 

[Corn Flakes]

If this is true, why did Hitler bother to invade Russia? Or France, for that matter?

According to him, resources and territory. Just because the NacSoc "utopia" would be each nation caring for their own citizens, doesn't mean they won't covet each other's shit.

 

[JohnDoe]

If this is true, why did Hitler bother to invade Russia? Or France, for that matter?

To secure resources and lebensraum für der Volk, natürlisch. But seriously, the French humiliated them after the first war, and seized massive tracts of German land that had to be retaken. After that, steamrolling to Paris and exploiting it to get back was stolen was a natural impulse.

 

[Sekirodiealot]

Found this



All of this is related to nicki minaj sharing a tucker carlson video and hasan piker asking her if she met a white nationalist.