there are threads on /vm/, i don't know about your example specifically but they do talk about liking loli openly as one would expect from a 4chan thread so i probably would not put it out of the question
There used to be one that was popular in 2014-2016. I remember seeing that thread but I don't remember if the last time I saw it was right before the hack, or if it was a longer time ago like last year. Either way, that thread was very dead in these recent times, as most of its regular posters just grew up or went into other communities.
I hope it happens soon, i started to hate this faggot when he decided to falseflag some commentary youtuber's channel for criticizing him (The person who was targeted by the false flaggot was grimsy by the way).
I remember this guy becoming a faggot, the rename to Polyhex and the weird tumblr-ass artstyle he picked up were red flags. I actually encountered him in places online from time to time outside ROBLOX after he became Polyhex and he had a feeble way of writing. He would quickly see that he entered a place that was unashamedly uncensored and would silently leave moments after seeing someone demonstrate this. I think he started trooning out not long after.
INB4 this website is taken down for "discriminating protected classes of people"
I've got a basic system in place (which has not, at this point, been tested) to automatically detect this kind of behavior because I expect that, sooner or later, it'll come. Occasionally you'll be asked to vote for a node which is basically a honeypot to spot malicious voters - stuff that I've marked as being unambiguously one category or another. If you get enough honeypot questions wrong, your votes stop counting, but nothing changes visually. However, I hope that the consensus mechanism will be strong enough that this won't be needed, as I think that, even during periods of attack, the number of truly malicious voters will be very small. Less data = less accurate predictions.
I understand your sentiment but please, don't vote this way. Enough people feeling this way will fuck up the consensus, especially when the site is in its infancy, and I don't want that. While I agree that there's probably something not right in your head if you're playing Roblox at 20, I'm more interested in cataloguing stuff like this:
If they do take it down I'm going to pay through the nose to get a dedi somewhere where being part of one of these "discriminated classes of people" is straight up illegal. Hopefully it won't come to that but rest assured this isn't coming down in a meaningful way any time soon.
Sorry for double posting (will it merge? idk) but don't worry about the users individually so much. The users are automatically catalogued based on their group memberships, so by marking the groups, you're essentially also putting a red mark on every member of that group.
This is a good tool! I think you should put up more of a disclaimer on what we need to vote for, as it seems that a lot of the votes are based on the members rather than the content of the group itself, which isn't what you're going for, right?
The group looks like it was bought. You can tell because in the comment section & the store that it is a clothing group way before the name was "Official Black Bulls". Likely a thing to bypass moderation filters.This shit has been up since 2021, what the FUCK???
https://www.roblox.com/communities/7295081/Official-Black-Bulls#!/about
A portion of these groups are nothing special, aside from the massive conglomerate of ERP accounts at the lowest rank of the group, using these groups like a directory to identify each other and potential victims alike. Ruben himself has covered this phenomenon before, for example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oB_TZ8lFe18
You can lock groups. Now, might not be good having to either allow people in one by one or not at all, when you're trying to make a public thing - however, I believe the positives outweigh the negatives.
