- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
if the final ruling from judge whoever, I don't care, even the worst Supreme, ended with that I would gain infinite respect for them
Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
-
π I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
Some day I'll write a script before I need it to do this. Today is not that day.
328
pdf
images
328
images
Silver Coin Anon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2024
After reading that, speculation time... is Greer too affected by mental disability to realize what he is doing all the time is FUCKING RETARDED, is he actively and knowingly malicious like a whoremongering pimplord (nonpractising), or is he both?
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2021
What?
...What?
"The clerk issued a subpoena"? While discovery is stayed? What clerk?
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2019
What's the betting that if Mr. Hardin agreed, all the previous mystery issues and work schedule conflicts and shit from the many previous failed attempts to meet and confer would suddenly disappear now that it's about something Greer wants.
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2022
I thought it was just me that was baffled by this stuff as well. What could a subpoena be for if it isn't for discovery? And is this how it normally works? You need the clerk of the court to issue one for you?
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2015
Well that's a +1 to the count of "Court Orders that Greer has decided don't apply to him". How high does the count have to get before the court decides that's a paddlin'?
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
From the clerk who issued the subpoena:
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2014
Ol' vinegar face must have decided he needs to get the lawsuit back on track.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
Greer finds himself in a fascinating Catch 22 of his own making. Sadly I think the Judge will ultimately allow it just to end the stalemate. But it is yet another example of Greer insisting the defense do his discovery for him.
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2020
Sir,
I have subpoena'd you to find more defendants to add to my case by doing my discovery for me while discovery is stayed. Why can't you just be reasonable about this? Plaintiff is trying his best.
Sent from my iPhone.
I have subpoena'd you to find more defendants to add to my case by doing my discovery for me while discovery is stayed. Why can't you just be reasonable about this? Plaintiff is trying his best.
Sent from my iPhone.
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2016
Hmmmm. Russ needs to discover information about the John Doe defendants in a case where discovery is stayed. This is quite the quandary. While technically, yes, it violates the stay, I think the judge will tardguard (tm) and let this one go through.
Bets on when the judge will reply? I'm saying in two weeks.
Bets on when the judge will reply? I'm saying in two weeks.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2021
Fucking moron clerk putting apostrophes on plural nouns, that doesn't bode well. Also, the motion to stay discovery was GRANTED, you illiterate fuck.
Unknown God
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2025
Did he trick the clerk into helping him issue a subpoena when he knew full well discovery is stayed? Is that what I'm reading?
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2020
Trick? No, he lacks the cognitive capacity to outsmart anyone.
Overwhelm with sheer stupidity? Now we're talking.
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2021
Next will be Greer's reply that "this isn't fair because Mr. Hardin is doing discovery. See? It's just an innocent goof. Now, sanction Hardin for doing his job", even though that's not accurate.
DHugo
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2022
He just doesn't understand legal stuff, but he managed to get a paralegal degree in twice the time it takes to get one, so he believes he's a lawyer.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
I really hope the Judge points out that Greer had the opportunity to challenge the stay or ask for any exceptions needed. And that time has past. Shitlips poor case management and planning does not make it Nulls responsibility.