- Joined
- Sep 30, 2023
I can't believe this case. I've loved lawfare way before I came here and never seen anything as awesome and cool as this in my entire lifetime.
It's really something special.
It's really something special.
Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah
-
- Docket No.
- 2:20-cv-00647
-
- Court
- District Court, D. Utah
-
- Filed
- Sep 15, 2020
-
- Terminated
- Apr 22, 2024
-
- Nature of Suit
- 820 Copyright
-
- Cause
- 17:0501 Copyright Infringement
-
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
-
- Jury Demand
- None
-
- Last Filing
- Aug 6, 2024
Parties (4)
- Parties
- Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer
Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| — | Aug 6, 2024 | Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf) | |
| 113 | May 15, 2024 | ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024) | |
| 112 | Apr 28, 2024 | NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024) | |
| 111 | Apr 25, 2024 | Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) | |
| 110 | Apr 25, 2024 | NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024) |
Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
-
- Docket No.
- 21-4128
-
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
-
- Filed
- Oct 26, 2021
-
- Nature of Suit
- 3820 Copyright
-
- Last Filing
- Oct 15, 2023
Recent Filings (showing 5 of 11)
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10010936535 | Oct 15, 2023 | Case termination for opinion | |
| 10010794067 | Jan 5, 2023 | [10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM] | |
| 10010791785 | Jan 2, 2023 | [10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM] | |
| 10010776728 | Dec 1, 2022 | [10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM] | |
| 10010776140 | Nov 30, 2022 | [10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM] |
GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida
-
- Docket No.
- 3:24-cv-00122
-
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Florida
-
- Filed
- Mar 19, 2024
-
- Terminated
- Jun 10, 2024
-
- Nature of Suit
- 820 Copyright
-
- Cause
- 17:501 Copyright Infringement
-
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
-
- Jury Demand
- None
-
- Last Filing
- Oct 16, 2024
Parties (4)
- Parties
- RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS
Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| — | Oct 16, 2024 | ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah) | |
| 132 | Oct 15, 2024 | Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) | |
| 131 | Jul 10, 2024 | AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) | |
| 130 | Jun 10, 2024 | ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) | |
| 129 | Jun 10, 2024 | Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024) |
Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah
-
- Docket No.
- 2:24-cv-00421
-
- Court
- District Court, D. Utah
-
- Filed
- Jun 10, 2024
-
- Nature of Suit
- 820 Copyright
-
- Cause
- 17:0501 Copyright Infringement
-
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
-
- Jury Demand
- Plaintiff
-
- Last Filing
- Apr 27, 2026
Parties (4)
- Parties
- Russell G. Greer, Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon
Recent Filings (showing 5 of 50)
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 473 | Apr 27, 2026 | RESPONSE re 468 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision 460 to District Court filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/28/2026) | |
| 472 | Apr 14, 2026 | MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 465 Response re 462 Order filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) | |
| 471 | Apr 14, 2026 | MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) | |
| 470 | Apr 13, 2026 | Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) | |
| 469 | Apr 13, 2026 | MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026) |
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2014
You mean every other case that he has lost?
This is the first and only case he's ever had a win. He may not have gone through a psychosexual evaluation in the stalking case, but it's still a far cry to say the judge pitied the retard. I know Greee surely dosen't think so.
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2015
@Potentially Criminal is fat and Natalie would not have sex with him
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2019
Not for free, at least.
DHugo
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2022
Fat person + Titties person = Kino Casino
He just wants to be a shameless copycat.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Greer v. Hardin
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2018
Greeeevangelion (it makes even less sense than the anime it's parodying)
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2023
you must check one
Checks nothing.
So he just admits to violating the stay on discovery here?
He thinks Hardin shouldn't be allowed to talk to anybody while discovery is stayed?
Last edited:
ChickenFriedFan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2025
Greer uses his mush mouth to pleasure every Judge in his court cases to completion. 100% true fact.
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2015
This is even stupider than I imagined. It's literally just a list of what counsel is supposed to do. There's accusations but he didn't really even puff it up.
He made someone a WITNESS, you guys. Unilaterally.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2022
I'd like to point out this specifically
We have here neither "insufficient evidence", nor a procedural defect, nor "try again". As far as I understand, this is a substantive legal finding, with a judge concluding that Hardin's alleged conduct does not meet the statutory elements
Thus it's objective evidence of retaliatory litigation, not to mention a gigantic credibility drain for any attempt to label anything Hardin does as "dangerous" or "stalking"
We have here neither "insufficient evidence", nor a procedural defect, nor "try again". As far as I understand, this is a substantive legal finding, with a judge concluding that Hardin's alleged conduct does not meet the statutory elements
Thus it's objective evidence of retaliatory litigation, not to mention a gigantic credibility drain for any attempt to label anything Hardin does as "dangerous" or "stalking"
- Joined
- May 16, 2019
They must have seen this answer and immediately groaned, "oh it's one of THOSE".
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
I suspect Mr. Hardin might make a point of that (just speculation)
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Only if the other party doesn't challenge it. It doesn't just automatically last that long. Since it's ex parte, with the other party given no advance notice to challenge it, such challenges are generally heard nearly immediately (at least as courts go).
Or just hire a runner to go get it. There are services in any decent sized city whose job is literally just to go to courts and retrieve documents that, because of the boomer nature of courts, actually require going there to pick up a physical copy if you want it today.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Nice of Greer to admit he has been giving out fake addresses to Utah federal court and Florida federal court.
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2019
ChatGPT came up with an absolute banger of a euphemism for "building a whorehouse" with "lawful zoning and land-use advocacy"
What the fuck is this?
What the fuck is this?
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2018
Russell, you lie as easily as you drool. Your Winnemucca adventure occurred on the same day as the hearing. You tried to reschedule without giving a reason, and you tried to hide what you were doing from Judge Bowtie. Of course Hardin would get curious and look into it.