The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

Outcome?

  • Guilty of Murder

    Votes: 75 7.6%

  • Not Guilty of Murder (2nd/3rd), Guilty of Manslaughter

    Votes: 397 40.0%

  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 221 22.3%

  • Mistrial

    Votes: 299 30.1%
  • Total voters
    992
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Escaped Abortion said:
I don't think this will be a case where the evidence will even matter. Since Chauvin was willing to take the plea deal without even going to trial, I could see it becoming an issue of what to convict him of as a means of controlling the subsequent Minneapolis burn.

Let's be real, it will burn even if they get everything they want, but it will be nothing but ashes if they don't. If Chauvin was willing to hang to cool their rage a bit, would any of these people have reason to deny his wish?
Click to expand...
I know it’s a bit cliche but
 

Attachments

  • DDBF3AB2-BEE1-401A-859B-4036573ABD2B.gif
    DDBF3AB2-BEE1-401A-859B-4036573ABD2B.gif
    496.8 KB · Views: 29
  • Like
Reactions: Nazi Catboi, EvaBraunsGhost and Neo-Holstien
Greyfield said:
White women are the least likely of any racial group to date outside their race, but Neo-Nazis are still super concerned about that shit and cry about every interracial couple they see in commercials.

And while Asian men are at 21%, that's still lower than men from Hispanic and Black backgrounds, which is insane because Asian men are doing amazing economically speaking.
Click to expand...
Have you considered that the rate is low because there's pressure against it from "neo-nazi" white men, you commie faggot?
 
  • Dislike
  • Like
Reactions: Shield Breaker, Starslop's Adoring Fan, Punished Benis and 3 others
AnOminous said:
He rules lots of things. What witnesses are allowed even to testify. What they're allowed to testify about. What lines of questioning are allowed. When they end. Whether the case is dismissed outright. Whether the defendant gets acquitted notwithstanding the verdict. Every single aspect of the testimony and evidence presented to the jury is within the control of the judge, who can even acquit the defendant at the end of the trial without the jury getting to do a single thing, or even acquit the defendant after the jury convicts.
Click to expand...
Wow, you know a whole lot about this process for someone who has repeatedly lied about being a lawyer. This is evidence enough to have you reported to the Internet Bar for disciplinary action.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: spiky, Clotso Coof, Not Really Here and 6 others
MuuMuu Bunnylips said:
View attachment 2044099
Click to expand...

Worked as a Firefighter/EMT. Fat women were the absolute worst. They couldn't maintain fitness levels required to be a firefighter, couldn't go a week without bringing baby daddy drama to the fire house, and were the most toxic aspect of my time in the fire service. I can almost promise they're always fucking an officer behind the scenes and everyone else hates them. Woe be the day you've got this woman manning a rescue line when you do an interior attack on a structure, because there's no way her wobbling ass is hauling you out.

She's wearing her dress uniform to trial, even though she's not on duty now nor during the arrest, because she's obese and being a firefighter is the one positive in her life. I guarantee you she wears her dress uniform while off duty to get free meals.

She tried to freelance on a scene she had no business getting involved in and is upset that the officers on scene didn't know who the fuck she was, so weren't about to let some rando go hands on with their perp who had already been resisting arrest. She's a dumbass and should be removed from the department before she freelances somewhere else and gets someone killed with her stupid ass.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Donny Cheese, Knight of the Rope, Toma and 113 others
Austrian Conscript 1915 said:
objectively wrong. Winston Churchill was a fat moron warmonger. He is solely responsible for the Gallipoli disaster
Click to expand...
You’re a fucking retard. If it wasn’t for Churchill Britain would be speaking German. Was he a perfect person? No, but you’d have fucking crumbled in his shoes you human paraquat. Churchill was a good man, and thorough.
 
  • Like
  • Dislike
  • Agree
Reactions: Exterminatus, JustALurker18, (deleted member) and 10 others
soy_king said:
Wow, you know a whole lot about this process for someone who has repeatedly lied about being a lawyer. This is evidence enough to have you reported to the Internet Bar for disciplinary action.
Click to expand...
The great thing about law talking on the Internet is at least in real countries like the United States, the law is public (and where it is not it is really bad but let us not go into that now).

You can confirm every claim I made. Including the existence of such a thing as a Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law in Minnesota. It's amazing! Not even absolute charlatans such as I can deceive you when there are publicly available sources that actually tell you the law!

And you can even find shit that says I'm wrong, if I actually am, and then talk mad shit about me.

Absolutely nobody can make certain statements about juries, though, because they can do anything. I'm betting on this jury convicting this asshole of something. No matter what it is, it's getting appealed. Denying the motion for a change of venue, after the entire jury pool more or less stated they already personally hated the defendant, is pretty amazing.

Way to set up an appeal, idiots.

And on that general subject, why not grant a change of venue? Obviously the defense would want to move it to a white enclave, but seriously, would moving it to St. Paul have been a huge deal? What reason could they have for not changing venue other than that they're literally rigging the trial to guarantee a conviction?
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Donny Cheese, EvaBraunsGhost, Coccxys and 27 others
N-BOMB said:
You’re a fucking retard. If it wasn’t for Churchill Britain would be speaking German. Was he a perfect person? No, but you’d have fucking crumbled in his shoes you human paraquat. Churchill was a good man, and thorough.
Click to expand...
Because there was no one else in the British government who could've done the work he did. disrespectful to those people who did more work under more pressure than Mr. Fatass
 
  • Dislike
  • Like
Reactions: LurkTrawl, McGregor, N-BOMB and 6 others
Austrian Conscript 1915 said:
Because there was no one else in the British government who could've done the work he did. disrespectful to those people who did more work under more pressure than Mr. Fatass
Click to expand...
Fuck off, Nazi. Churchill was God even if he drank enough booze every day to float an aircraft carrier.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: AnotherPleb, Coccxys, Exterminatus and 13 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back