10/04/2019 - Judge Chupp Dismisses All Claims Against Defendant - Take your Sperging Here

[X Prime]

As it is, there is now only one case, the appeal, unless Vic chooses not to appeal. There's an accelerated briefing schedule, strict page limits on filings, and a known timeline for what happens from now on, with a ruling in a relatively speedy fashion.

I'm not sure if Judge Chupp's off the cuff three months guess is correct, but hey, he'd know. He should be used to being reversed by now.

Page limits? In this case? Be still my heart.

I could not imagine what filings would have looked like if page limits were a thing.

 

[heyilikeyourmom]

Saw this one coming a mile away.

 

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

The worst part is the Law Twitter and KickVic celebration dance along with the clickbait media feasting on Vic. Other than that, I hope it's a good lesson that Anti-SLAPP isn't some sort free speech shit and can be easily abused. Vic's loss would always have been because of technicalities (how he presented his case--Ty's failure, and supposed interpretations of "free speech" shit like the TCPA).

Don't threaten Chupp with death, demand the Texas Legislature or states with similar laws to fix their anti-SLAPP laws, since we have proof that a lawsuit over being called a cuck by randos and a lawsuit over being called an pedorapist and having your business associates threatened by your coworkers and companies they work are treated exactly the same and cost defendents exactly the same. Your average judge cannot handle these suits--there's too many chances to get a Chupp or Borrok (i.e. political functionaries of whatever's the strongest political party in their area).

But let's see the appeal. Let's see how broken shit really is. As I posted elsewhere, are we going to have the exact opposite of Jonathan Yaniv being able to win big bucks against people who call him a pedo and present evidence that he indeed is a pedo?

 

[Mage]

Probably enough time for people to forget Weeb Wars so he's definitely safe.

Absolutely. And his Win-Loss record says it all: https://ballotpedia.org/John_P._Chupp

 

[tsuzoku]

A dark day indeed when that wonderful woman isn't around to make this place better.

Women use too much psychology on men

 

[Pomniman]

Considering that they were already sending death threats after the first hearing, the more autismal contingent of those following this case is going to flip.

 

[Dean Pentel]

Women use too much psychology on men

Is this when I'm supposed to break out the "incel" rebuttal? Even though I'm a virgin myself?

 

[AnOminous]

Considering that they were already sending death threats after the first hearing, the more autismal contingent of those following this case is going to flip.

They're idiots and probably think it's a left wing SJW judge instead of a lazy ass Republican who just doesn't want to do his job and doesn't even know what an SJW is.

 

[tsuzoku]

Is this when I'm supposed to break out the "incel" rebuttal? Even though I'm a virgin myself?

Listen man, I'm not an incel, I'm a gay person.
and I like to talk to women just not date them

 

[Yuusha-sama]

https://twitter.com/LawArchive/status/1180221546553585664

Twitter

archived 4 Oct 2019 20:46:35 UTC

archive.li

 

[tsuzoku]

Listen man, I'm not an incel, I'm a gay person.
and I like to talk to women just not date them

Just be careful of what women you pick because women are intellectually dumber than men

 

[Dean Pentel]

Listen man, I'm not an incel, I'm a gay person.
and I like to talk to women just not date them

Hmm...well, according to KF I'm gay and autistic (and sometimes late). We can be gaybros together. I don't like to talk to women, though. Unless it's my mom, and I want to know if the tendies and tater tots are done.

 

[lawtwitterthrowaway]

View attachment 959389

https://twitter.com/LawArchive/status/1180221546553585664

*Rubs hands together*
Mmm-MMM, I can already taste the simmering rage from here! How many bottles do you think they'll get through?

 

[tsuzoku]

Well, follow me on pleroma:https://kiwifarms.cc/Imsohappybros
[

Hmm...well, according to KF I'm gay and autistic (and sometimes late). We can be gaybros together. I don't like to talk to women, though. Unless it's my mom, and I want to know if the tendies and tater tots are done.

 

[AnIncredibleDerp]

Well that was an exceptional document that threaded back and forth between multiple types of law that Chupp didn't even bother hearing/caring about. The prima facie part wasn't even demonstrated in the hearing, Chupp didn't let Ty complete that one. Then we have preponderance of the evidence which Chupp ignored and was focused on some other facet of the case during the hearing.

Chupp is doing everything in his power to divulge himself of this case and let some other judge handle it in Appeals.

There's a ton of data points in all the filed documents, Ty's 1100 page sperg fest covers everything needed in appeal, but all of it was ignored because...reasons?

I assumed this was gonna happen and Ty and Co are going straight to appeals so now we enter the Myer v. Waid struggle with most of this case going cold for months.

I like the part where he skipped his reasoning for the decisions.

 

[X Prime]

So wait a minute.

Isn't withdrawing parts of your filing a modification?

How can you consider one modification after the deadline as OK, but not another one?

 

[Notgoodwithusernames]

Absolutely. And his Win-Loss record says it all: https://ballotpedia.org/John_P._Chupp

two of his wins were unopposed and for all we know Paul Enlow (his opponent in the 2010 primaries) was somehow stupider than he is.

 

[WhimsicalTrolli]

We tried so hard and the end it doesn't even matter. Welp time to find new cows.

 

[Adach_Ame]

*Rubs hands together*
Mmm-MMM, I can already taste the simmering rage from here! How many bottles do you think they'll get through?

More annoyed at Nick's primary getting suspended again than at the ruling. Cause again, this wasn't the worst case scenario.

 

[lawtwitterthrowaway]

So wait a minute.

Isn't withdrawing parts of your filing a modification?

How can you consider one modification after the deadline as OK, but not another one?

TL;DR: The response (which he withdrew the affidavits from) was one document filed at almost the correct time. The 2aP was basically an entirely different document improperly filed after the deadline.