- Joined
- Mar 6, 2017
Grown adults don’t. Stunted “progressive” snowflakes do.
They don't, though. They're lying. It's about speech control.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Grown adults don’t. Stunted “progressive” snowflakes do.
Please, Airplane makes everybody look bad. Gays, blacks, Jews, Asians, the mentally ill, moralizers, recovering addicts, Detroit.... Its an endless list.
He was named for Nathan Bedford Forrest, who was an ancestor, as explained in the book and movie, as a way for his mother to remind him some people do dumb things.I couldn't get past them saying the title character of Forrest Gump was Nathan Bedford Forrest.
His name is Forrest Gump. People call him "Forrest Gump." Ffs.
The writer should just be honest that he hates this movie because it portrays the court of public opinion to be dangerous and evil. Back when the film was made it was conservatives that could shut lives down. Now it's the left and their cancel culture.“The Children’s Hour” (1961)
Based on a play by liberal activist Lillian Hellman, this drama tackled a once-taboo subject. Two teachers (Shirley MacLaine, Audrey Hepburn) are horrified when a bratty student accuses them of being lesbians. Eventually, one of the teachers weepingly confesses that she DOES have lesbian feelings and then does something that’s presented as inevitable: She kills herself. The film set the tone for depictions of LGBT people for decades, showing them as self-loathing, pitiable and perverted.
He was named for Nathan Bedford Forrest, who was an ancestor, as explained in the book and movie, as a way for his mother to remind him some people do dumb things.
That's exactly why they're assblasted about this movie. Remember, according to them, all it takes to be trans is to say "I'm trans". No doctor visits, no psychiatric evaluations, nothing. Buffalo Bill said he's trans, so why shouldn't that be good enough for Hannibal? They might even think that if he was allowed legal gender reassignment surgery, he never would have killed at all. Even though Bill was a violent Borderline individual who hated himself so much he thought a woman suit would solve all his problems.And it's a character that isn't even trans. It is stated multiple times in both the novel and the film that he isn't.
"Billy is not a real transexual. But he thinks he is. He tries to be. He’s tried to be a lot of things, I expect."
-Hannibal Lecter, the gatekeeping truscum.
Doesn't Hannibal pretty much say that Buffalo Bill wants to be anyone but himself?That's exactly why they're assblasted about this movie. Remember, according to them, all it takes to be trans is to say "I'm trans". No doctor visits, no psychiatric evaluations, nothing. Buffalo Bill said he's trans, so why shouldn't that be good enough for Hannibal? They might even think that if he was allowed legal gender reassignment surgery, he never would have killed at all. Even though Bill was a violent Borderline individual who hated himself so much he thought a woman suit would solve all his problems.
They probably don't know what to do with Coming to America since there are only two white people with speaking roles in the entire movie. Three if you count Eddie Murphy in Jew-face.Is Coming to America next because it shows a clash of cultures between native-born Africans, albeit from a fictional wealthy nation, and Americans of African decent?
The famous dinner scene was initially conceived as the Indians cleverly pranking the foreigners: because they know dumb foreigners expect Indians to be savages that eat nasty shit like bugs and snakes, they trick them into actually eating that (or at the least be very grossed out) by serving it to them. Later it became a way to indicate to the audience that something was very wrong in the palace. There was a cut remark in which Indy says to someone (probably Willie) that something isn't right because devout Hindus would never eat that shit.Shit like this makes me wonder if the person writing this even saw any of these movies. The cult in that film were explicity shown to be a bastardization and corruption of hindu customs, and were more or less a child traffiking mafia with spiritual/occult shit attached as a way for them to gain more power and influence in the world. They weren't "primitive" considering how elaborate their plans were and only got violent when they "needed" to.
"Ace Ventura: The Pet Detective"?