Greg Sestero said:
Null said:
We'll see how their reaction goes. If they are ungrateful, then they're on their own.
Man, I hate to be a complete douche - I think we got off on the wrong foot, because you were in charge of the Chris fund and I spent my first few posts vocally opposing it - but I have to do this.
"Nobody here is expecting a "thank you". We expect Chris to take it for granted..." - You
That's not a hypocritical statement.
Just because we're expecting them to be ungrateful doesn't mean that the reaction won't warrant a further lack of empathy. I don't speak for everyone who donated, but my motivation was to both potentially help people that needed it, and on top of that make a move so generous and without warrant that it would set the stage for future action. I know that Chris will only encounter further tribulations, and I want to get this question answered: "Is there anything I can do to help Chris?"
The next time something burns down, or his car breaks down, or Barb dies, or his house gets robbed, people will say "this would be a good time to help out another human being" and they will look
at this moment for precedent. What Chris does after the contributions arrive, be it he throws the box away, or criticizes the gesture, or (inversely) writes a letter of appreciation on Facebook -- that will be the deciding factor on if people will choose to aid Chris. If he tears up a money order, literally rejecting what a group of 40 people put together for him, no rational person will ever want to do anything for him again.
So, no. Do I expect Chris to be appreciative, or to even respond? No. Does this new information of Chris+Barb affect my view? Yes, of course it does. Is the door still open for them to not be pricks? Yep.