2019-03-17 - New Zealand Police: "We would like to preserve any posts and technical data including IP addresses, email addresses etc"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Since we're on the topic of firearms, a favorite topic by the way, I thought I'd chime in with the fact that a county in Georgia where gun ownership is required, by law (as long as a person is not exceptional or a felon). It's got one of the lowest crime rates in the state. Just say'n.
Is it legal for them to require residents to purchase a gun? If I move there how long do I have to buy a gun before I'm in violation of the law?
 
Since we're on the topic of firearms, a favorite topic by the way, I thought I'd chime in with the fact that a county in Georgia where gun ownership is required, by law (as long as a person is not exceptional or a felon). It's got one of the lowest crime rates in the state. Just say'n.
Yeah, the vast majority of criminals have no intention or desire to be shot in the face during their work. If only the vast majority of dumbfucks realized why the 7-11 with a shotgun under the counter never got robbed, while the convenient store across the street with the Chinese guy always does.
 
Yeah, the vast majority of criminals have no intention or desire to be shot in the face during their work. If only the vast majority of dumbfucks realized why the 7-11 with a shotgun under the counter never got robbed, while the convenient store across the street with the Chinese guy always does.

I always thought it was in fact the Asian dude (usually a Korean though) who had the shotgun under the counter.
 
Is it legal for them to require residents to purchase a gun? If I move there how long do I have to buy a gun before I'm in violation of the law?
According to this article, you are exempt from owning a gun if you are a "pauper", so I assume that means that citizens have to buy their own guns. If they can't afford one, they are not violating the law.

I didn't see anything about a timeline as to how long you have to buy a gun if you live there but there are a ton of exceptions to the law, so I don't think you would have to worry.

https://rense.com/general9/gunlaw.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
According to this article, you are exempt from owning a gun if you are a "pauper", so I assume that means that citizens have to buy their own guns. If they can't afford one, they are not violating the law.

That should be no excuse.

752665
 
That should be no excuse.

View attachment 752665
LMAO!! Love it!

Switzerland has a similar law that every able bodied person must own a firearm (unless they're exceptional). I believe the government provides them, but they cannot be automatic weapons, only semi automatic. Their reasoning is that the Swiss citizens are an arm of their military, or a militia, and they must be ready to defend the homeland. Not that anyone really has the desire to invade Switzerland, but hey, whatever works. I'm all for responsible gun ownership and if needed irresponsible gun ownership as well (because of zombies). :story::story::story:
 
Since we're on the topic of firearms, a favorite topic by the way, I thought I'd chime in with the fact that a county in Georgia where gun ownership is required, by law (as long as a person is not exceptional or a felon). It's got one of the lowest crime rates in the state. Just say'n.

That's actually the town of Kennesaw, Georgia. The ordinance isn't enforced from what I understand, but to your point, it does have a very low crime rate. One flashpoint was at a FedEx distribution center about 5 years ago - guy came in and shot up the place, wounded six, then suck-started his own pistol.
 
Why am I not surprised? Cuckistan seems more determined than ever not to let a good crisis go to waste.



New Zealand: Citizens Receiving Home Visits From ‘Political Police’
Man asked if he supports President Trump


New Zealanders are receiving home visits from police to check on their political views, with one individual claiming that authorities asked him if he supported Donald Trump.

The visits are taking place as a response to March’s Christchurch mosque massacre.

In one clip, armed police arrive at a man’s home on Sunday morning to question him in relation to his political beliefs.

“The reason we’re here, basically it’s down to the recent events in Christchurch, with the shooting there, a number of people have been identified who we’ve been asked to go and speak to, so you’re one of those people,” says the officer.

The man is happy to talk to the cops, but they refuse to do so on camera and eventually leave.

In a separate clip, another man relates the story of how he was visited by armed police (again on a Sunday morning) because he makes YouTube videos criticizing mass migration.

The man’s wife and daughter, who were both upset by the experience, were also interviewed by police.

“I was asked if I was a Trump supporter, I was asked if I was a racist and have I got any ethnic minority friends,” said the man, who runs a YouTuber channel called Cross the Rubicon, adding that police also quizzed him on whether he owned guns.

Within a week, police returned to the house – 15 of them this time – closing off the entire street – to again interrogate him on his political views.

“They’re trying to force me to shut my mouth and to keep it shut,” the man said.

He also warns that governments are exploiting the mosque shooting to deplatform conservatives.

One wonders whether random Muslims receive home visits from police after Islamic terror attacks. Unlikely.
 
Why am I not surprised? Cuckistan seems more determined than ever not to let a good crisis go to waste.



New Zealand: Citizens Receiving Home Visits From ‘Political Police’
Man asked if he supports President Trump


New Zealanders are receiving home visits from police to check on their political views, with one individual claiming that authorities asked him if he supported Donald Trump.

The visits are taking place as a response to March’s Christchurch mosque massacre.

In one clip, armed police arrive at a man’s home on Sunday morning to question him in relation to his political beliefs.

“The reason we’re here, basically it’s down to the recent events in Christchurch, with the shooting there, a number of people have been identified who we’ve been asked to go and speak to, so you’re one of those people,” says the officer.

The man is happy to talk to the cops, but they refuse to do so on camera and eventually leave.

In a separate clip, another man relates the story of how he was visited by armed police (again on a Sunday morning) because he makes YouTube videos criticizing mass migration.

The man’s wife and daughter, who were both upset by the experience, were also interviewed by police.

“I was asked if I was a Trump supporter, I was asked if I was a racist and have I got any ethnic minority friends,” said the man, who runs a YouTuber channel called Cross the Rubicon, adding that police also quizzed him on whether he owned guns.

Within a week, police returned to the house – 15 of them this time – closing off the entire street – to again interrogate him on his political views.

“They’re trying to force me to shut my mouth and to keep it shut,” the man said.

He also warns that governments are exploiting the mosque shooting to deplatform conservatives.

One wonders whether random Muslims receive home visits from police after Islamic terror attacks. Unlikely.

And all this, is exactly what Brenton Tarrant set out to do. They've taken the bait and just won't let go.

worm-bait.jpg


It's absolutely frightening that this is all coming out of an Anglophone country of all things. Political police? 14 years in prison for sharing a God damn video? Sounds like shit that belongs in Communist China not a fucking "Western" country.
 
Why am I not surprised? Cuckistan seems more determined than ever not to let a good crisis go to waste.



New Zealand: Citizens Receiving Home Visits From ‘Political Police’
Man asked if he supports President Trump


New Zealanders are receiving home visits from police to check on their political views, with one individual claiming that authorities asked him if he supported Donald Trump.

The visits are taking place as a response to March’s Christchurch mosque massacre.

In one clip, armed police arrive at a man’s home on Sunday morning to question him in relation to his political beliefs.

“The reason we’re here, basically it’s down to the recent events in Christchurch, with the shooting there, a number of people have been identified who we’ve been asked to go and speak to, so you’re one of those people,” says the officer.

The man is happy to talk to the cops, but they refuse to do so on camera and eventually leave.

In a separate clip, another man relates the story of how he was visited by armed police (again on a Sunday morning) because he makes YouTube videos criticizing mass migration.

The man’s wife and daughter, who were both upset by the experience, were also interviewed by police.

“I was asked if I was a Trump supporter, I was asked if I was a racist and have I got any ethnic minority friends,” said the man, who runs a YouTuber channel called Cross the Rubicon, adding that police also quizzed him on whether he owned guns.

Within a week, police returned to the house – 15 of them this time – closing off the entire street – to again interrogate him on his political views.

“They’re trying to force me to shut my mouth and to keep it shut,” the man said.

He also warns that governments are exploiting the mosque shooting to deplatform conservatives.

One wonders whether random Muslims receive home visits from police after Islamic terror attacks. Unlikely.
They're shutting off his street because he might have illegal opinions?

Even when America went through its moral panic following Columbine, we weren't this bad. We might have gotten a few concerts canceled, but we didn't have the police putting shit on lockdown because someone heard their neighbor playing an electric guitar in their garage.

At this point, Chinese tanks could roll through the streets of New Zealand and I wouldn't give a single solitary fuck.
 
Or that there's a shithole country so outright fascistic that not only is this a crime at all, which is insane, but it's such a heinous crime that you have to be held without bail indefinitely until trial. That's so fucked that the mentality of someone who just flips out in such a country and starts shooting people doesn't even seem all that insane.

They are not actually trying to crack down on your freedom to be a sociopath online, they are trying to prevent possible reprisals and hold their multicultural experiment together. How people like you can get the government reaction so totally and utterly wrong is a mystery to me. I suspect it is in fact deliberate. This whole "Political Correctness left him no other choice but to commit mass murder" line I am hearing is another pathetic cope. There was absolutely no "flip out" involved. It was planned years in advance and committed in cold blood.

People bitching and moaning because they cannot share literal terrorist propaganda or complaining that their government is "cucked" because they can't distribute a snuff movie makes me think the left, despite all their stupid excesses, actually does still retain the moral high ground.
 
They are not actually trying to crack down on your freedom to be a sociopath online, they are trying to prevent possible reprisals and hold their multicultural experiment together. How people like you can get the government reaction so totally and utterly wrong is a mystery to me. I suspect it is in fact deliberate. This whole "Political Correctness left him no other choice but to commit mass murder" line I am hearing is another pathetic cope. There was absolutely no "flip out" involved. It was planned years in advance and committed in cold blood.

People bitching and moaning because they cannot share literal terrorist propaganda or complaining that their government is "cucked" because they can't distribute a snuff movie makes me think the left, despite all their stupid excesses, actually does still retain the moral high ground.

It's more than that. What is happening in the UK /European union is happening here (NZ). Even talking about said media can be fined or imprisoned. People are being put on watch-lists. Hell, I'm probably on one. I don't know how much I buy into the conspiracy theories but there were many things happening around the time to indicate something off about the whole thing. The Government's determination to allow more and more refugees into the country despite all the social inequalities that exist has raised more than a few eyebrows, but after Christchurch, it is racist to question it. It is also important to note that Winston Peters, a notorious anti immigration politician has given in to the demands of the the erverload Jacinda and her party (remember NZ has a different political system to most) . Originally, Labour reduced the allowed percentage of skilled immigrants into the country.

In terms of gun control, NZ's gun culture is waaay different to that of the US's. Per normal law making process, it takes forever to a bill to become law. Yet after Christchurch it was more or less enacted without the normal processes. People's doors are being kicked in by usually useless police to seize licensed weapons.

So, combined with what amounts to censorship, threats to national sovereignty and enforced seizure of weapons, based on a so called lone wolf act seems to be fascist. That is what we're (NZ'ers) are afraid of. The whole "Political Correctness left him no other choice but to commit mass murder" argument just minimises the bigger picture.


Think about this: Allegedly ONE crazy motherfucker created a political and social landslide. Coincidence? I think not!
 
Last edited:
People bitching and moaning because they cannot share literal terrorist propaganda or complaining that their government is "cucked" because they can't distribute a snuff movie makes me think the left, despite all their stupid excesses, actually does still retain the moral high ground.
Newsworthy material, even graphic or disturbing material, is free to distribute and examine for purposes of public, open auditing.

Public auditing is essential to a western democracy and limiting it means that you've got less of a democracy, and more of a totalitarian state. New Zealand is closer to the China end of the spectrum than the US end of the spectrum because of their actions in response to this event.

These actions are analogous to a hypothetical scenario in which the US government attempted to arrest and prosecute journalists for publishing footage of the September 11th terrorist attacks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back