2019-12-23 - Lindsay B. Lieberman on behalf of "K.W."

Status
Not open for further replies.

Null

Ooperator
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Nov 14, 2012
646.666.8908 | 16 COURT STREET, 33rd Floor | BROOKLYN, NY 11241
LINDSAY@CAGOLDBERGLAW.COM | WWW.CAGOLDBERGLAW.COM

December 23, 2019

Re: Notice of Copyright Infringement Pursuant to DMCA

To Whom It May Concern
This letter is notice of copyright infringement pursuant to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”). The content described below is of an intimate nature and has been illegally published on your website without authorization or consent. C.A. Goldberg, PLLC, represent the copyright owner. Each of the required DMCA notice elements is listed below. See 17 U.S.C. § 512(c)(3).
Due to the underlying illegality of hosting these images, immediately remove the content listed in item #3 below, and provide notice to me when you have done so. Failure to comply expeditiously will result in potentially adverse consequences.

Infringement Notice Elements:

1. A physical or electronic signature of a person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.

I am the attorney for the copyright owner, K.W., and duly authorized to act on her behalf. Please see my signature at the end of this letter.


2. Identification of the copyrighted work claimed to have been infringed, or, if multiple copyrighted works at a single online site are covered by a single notification, a representative list of such works at that site.

The works owned by K.W., and that are being infringed on your website, are:

Intimate photos/videos of K.W.


3. Identification of the material that is claimed to be infringing or to be the subject of infringing activity and that is to be removed or access to which is to be disabled, and information reasonably sufficient to permit the service provider to locate the material.

The infringing content consists of each item identified above. It is located at the following URLs: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/gener...wcBN1qqQEvgOGnY6x2gnAcXcV0pdD1bsK5aHUBu-vHFOQ

Post#1


4.Information reasonably sufficient permit the service provider to contact the complaining party, such as an address, telephone number, and, if available, an electronic mail address at which the complaining party may be contacted.

I am the attorney for the copyright owner. I have a good-faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.


5. A statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.

Under penalty of perjury, I attest that the information in this notice is accurate, that I am the attorney for copyright owner, and that I am therefore authorized to act on the copyright owner’s behalf.
Sincerely, Lindsay B. Lieberman, Esq.
Lindsay Lieberman, attorney for K.W.
C.A. Goldberg, PLLC
16 Court Street, 33rd Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11241
Tel. (646) 666-8908
Email: dmca.cagoldberglaw@gmail.com

---

Merry Christmas to you too Lieberman.

Your automated system has misidentified something somewhere. I've looked
at it and can't match anything on that page with the alleged source and
they're clearly all edited. Find me the absolute URL, not just a thread
URL with 6 different things on it.

- Josh
 
asdad-jpg.871440


Are they claiming this? I don't understand...
 
I am the attorney for the copyright owner, K.W., and duly authorized to act on her behalf. Please see my signature at the end of this letter.
K.W. here is probably Kelly Wang, a daughter of a Goldman-Sachs exec who earned her five minutes of fame by starring in hardcore porn just a few days after her 18th birthday to spite daddy. Someone posted a screencap from one of those videos in that thread
The works owned by K.W., and that are being infringed on your website, are:

Intimate photos/videos of K.W.
It looks like she's trying to clean up her act.
 
Hey, time for a Carol to celebrate the new one we got, even if it's not 100% correct:

Deck the halls with C&D's
Fa-la-la-la, la-la, la-la
Can you write them better, please?
Fa-la-la-la, la-la, la-lar

Is it Greer or some queer,
Fa-la-la, fa-la-la, la-la, la!
Here's to more in the new year!
Fa-la-la-la-la, la-la, la-la.
 
K.W. here is probably Kelly Wang, a daughter of a Goldman-Sachs exec who earned her five minutes of fame by starring in hardcore porn just a few days after her 18th birthday to spite daddy. Someone posted a screencap from one of those videos in that thread

It looks like she's trying to clean up her act.

in that case shouldnt Facial Abuse yikes lol own the copyright?
 
What kind of person copyrights their daughter's porno?

Brings up an interesting concept. IF I HAVE THIS CORRECT. Trust fund brat takes a load to the face for a legitimate porn production company. She's 18 so the standard adult content contract is bullet proof and its perfectly legal to possess images of her. That means the porn production company owns the rights to the pic of her with cum all over her face and I'm sure a LOT more OC. Now if I were the porn company I'd be asking for a few million $$$ to own the rights to all images of princess considering who her dad is and what its worth to them to have a legal leg to stand on to claim they actually own daughter with cum on her face. That still doesn't jump the hurdle of being transformative modifying the original content for parody purposes. @Null Do I have this right?
 
Brings up an interesting concept. IF I HAVE THIS CORRECT. Trust fund brat takes a load to the face for a legitimate porn production company. She's 18 so the standard adult content contract is bullet proof and its perfectly legal to possess images of her. That means the porn production company owns the rights to the pic of her with cum all over her face and I'm sure a LOT more OC. Now if I were the porn company I'd be asking for a few million $$$ to own the rights to all images of princess considering who her dad is and what its worth to them to have a legal leg to stand on to claim they actually own daughter with cum on her face. That still doesn't jump the hurdle of being transformative modifying the original content for parody purposes. @Null Do I have this right?

Well on a quick Google search the full Facial Abuse video is up on multiple porno sites so if they've DMCA'ed those, they have been told to go fuck themselves (or take a few loads to the face as his daughter did).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back