2019-12-23 - Lindsay B. Lieberman on behalf of "K.W."

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
And she bought a 1966 Pontiac GTO a couple years ago.
The muscle car in question:
66PontiacGTO.jpg

One would have expected it to be red. It looks very well cared for, which is nice to see. It has been in her family, or circle of friends, for a while. There's probably not much opportunity to really open 'er up in Brooklyn. Shame. A car like that driven at a top speed of 25 MPH most of the time.

Any word on Madam Carrie's TV show? Stuck in Development Hell?
 
The person who the dodgy lawyers at C.A. Goldberg refer to as 'K.E.' appears to be 'Kate Copeland', a singer-songwriter type (her full name is 'Kate Copeland Ettinger.).

Allegedly, photographs of this person that were either taken by her or by someone who she allowed to take images of her are available at
https://thefappening.plus/kate-copeland-nude-leaked-photos-the-fappening-2019/
though I have not perused them as that would be morally wrong.

The person referred to as 'C.G.' appears to be 'Chanel Christian Gray', an American model. She seems to have had the common sense to stop wasting money on having these shysters send out fraudulent DMCAs.

The person referred to as 'C.O.' appears to be 'Courtney Christina O'Connell', some sort of 'fitness model'. Allegedly, pictures of her may be available here:
https://fitnakedgirls.com/gallery/courtney-christina-o-connell-nude/

The person referred to as 'H.O.' appears to be 'Holly Owens'. Owens appears to have moved on from the idiots at C.A. Goldberg, presumably they cost too much, and has instead used a small LA law firm and then moved on to submitting them herself.

Her self-authored DMCA submissions are charming.
THESE ARE PERSONAL EXPLICIT PHOTOS THAT WERE HACKED AND LEAKED FROM MY ICLOUD. I AM THE SOLE OWNER OF THE IMAGES AND NUMEROUS WEBSITES ARE IN VIOLATION OF DMCA. PLEASE HELP ME THIS IS HORRIBLE
THE PERSONAL AND INTIMATE PHOTOGRAPHS ARE ALL MINE AND OF ME AND MY BODY I AM THE LEGAL COPYRIGHT OWNER OF ALL WORKS AND THESE IMAGES WERE PART OF A CRIMINAL HACK THAT EXPLOITED ME AND LEAKED MY IMAGES ONLINE AGAINST MY CONSENT. PLEASE HELP ME REMEDY THIS TERRIBLE CRIME AND REMOVE ALL THE LINKS FROM YOUR GOOGLE SEARCH SITE!!

In some cases, they may have attempted to conceal names even further. They appear to have acted on behalf of Rosario Dawson in 2017 to attempt to hide nude photographs of herself that she sent to someone else who published them.

The person referred to as 'S.P.' appears to be 'Stevi Perry', described on some websites as "an American TV host and beauty queen who was crowned Miss Teen USA 2008."

Not sure who the person referred to as 'R.H.' is, but the DMCA submissions on her behalf demonstrate how lazy these lawyers are.. one describes the images as
Two self shot images. One depicts woman in shirt reading "sooner boomer". The other is topless. Both images are distributed without the consent of rights holder.
the other as
images of topless Caucasian woman/Image of Caucasian woman wearing gray shirt with word mark “Boomer Sooner”. No Authorized Uses.
Only one of these could be right.

On behalf of 'M.B.', they submitted complaints about two videos which sites described as 'Connecticut girl strips and bates'. The DMCA complaints claim "Videos have never been authorized for distribution"- despite the fact that they were clearly only ever available to be uploaded because they were deliberately distributed by Ms. M.B. as she was camming.

EDIT: The oddest DMCA notice I saw in there was one filed in early 2018, on behalf of a 'Felicia Giunta', to remove the 'COVERGIRL' tag page from a web Instagram viewer, and a couple images from the Instagram CDN (probably cached images that were showing up in Google image search). Now, I can't find any Felicia Giuntas modelling for Covergirl makeup, so a quick web search leaves the Maxim 'covergirl' competition as the likely subject. Unfortunately, that site (maximcovergirl.com) is down at the moment.

There seem to be a couple Felicia Giuntas floating round in NY, and while both of them are more attractive than the busted-ass hos that they would be competing against, one of them appears to be a school teacher and probably smart enough to realize that her students would 'enjoy' her being on the cover of Maxim a little too much. The other is a former professional (real, not pole) dancer who, from what I can see on various search engine caches, seems to have run in the latest 'covergirl' competition, and even linked it from her Instagram for a time.

So what gives? Did dancing Felicia run in 2017, not win, get mad, and purge her Instagram pictures promoting her entry from Google- then run again in 2019 (and lose again)? Did someone 'enter' one of the Felicias without her consent in 2017, leading her to spend hundreds of dollars getting Instagram pictures purged from Google, before dancing Felicia entered in 2019? Did teaching Felicia run in 2017, get cold feet, spend hundreds of dollars getting the photos purged from Google, before dancing Felicia entered in 2019? Did dancing Felicia enter both years but get sabotaged the first time by teaching Felicia at great expense because her students were using that entry to make fun of her? So many questions.
 
Last edited:
This is a lot of info. These people are a lowcow lawfirm, representing lowcows. They need their own thread so we can have a place to laugh at them.

Should I ask a janny to move posts from this thread into a new thread? Does this topic need its own thread, or shoul we stay in this one?
 
The person who the dodgy lawyers at C.A. Goldberg refer to as 'K.E.' appears to be 'Kate Copeland', a singer-songwriter type (her full name is 'Kate Copeland Ettinger.).

Allegedly, photographs of this person that were either taken by her or by someone who she allowed to take images of her are available at
https://thefappening.plus/kate-copeland-nude-leaked-photos-the-fappening-2019/
though I have not perused them as that would be morally wrong.

The person referred to as 'C.G.' appears to be 'Chanel Christian Gray', an American model. She seems to have had the common sense to stop wasting money on having these shysters send out fraudulent DMCAs.

The person referred to as 'C.O.' appears to be 'Courtney Christina O'Connell', some sort of 'fitness model'. Allegedly, pictures of her may be available here:
https://fitnakedgirls.com/gallery/courtney-christina-o-connell-nude/

The person referred to as 'H.O.' appears to be 'Holly Owens'. Owens appears to have moved on from the idiots at C.A. Goldberg, presumably they cost too much, and has instead used a small LA law firm and then moved on to submitting them herself.

Her self-authored DMCA submissions are charming.



In some cases, they may have attempted to conceal names even further. They appear to have acted on behalf of Rosario Dawson in 2017 to attempt to hide nude photographs of herself that she sent to someone else who published them.

The person referred to as 'S.P.' appears to be 'Stevi Perry', described on some websites as "an American TV host and beauty queen who was crowned Miss Teen USA 2008."

Not sure who the person referred to as 'R.H.' is, but the DMCA submissions on her behalf demonstrate how lazy these lawyers are.. one describes the images as

the other as

Only one of these could be right.

On behalf of 'M.B.', they submitted complaints about two videos which sites described as 'Connecticut girl strips and bates'. The DMCA complaints claim "Videos have never been authorized for distribution"- despite the fact that they were clearly only ever available to be uploaded because they were deliberately distributed by Ms. M.B. as she was camming.
You honor us all with your dedication to the truth my brother!
This is a lot of info. These people are a lowcow lawfirm, representing lowcows. They need their own thread so we can have a place to laugh at them.

Should I ask a janny to move posts from this thread into a new thread? Does this topic need its own thread, or shoul we stay in this one?
The initial buzz seems to be winding down but if we find more info I think chances are it would be good to have a place where we could compile it all this is stretching a bit beyond the mere fraudulent DMCA so if the info keeps pouring I say we should make a thread. But if the comments and interest keeps slowing then no need
 
This is a lot of info. These people are a lowcow lawfirm, representing lowcows. They need their own thread so we can have a place to laugh at them.

Should I ask a janny to move posts from this thread into a new thread? Does this topic need its own thread, or shoul we stay in this one?

All the info in this thread should be combined into an OP and organized for ease of reading and posted in prospering grounds. Ideally the people who did most of the legwork finding the info should do it.
 
And to think, this thots cum glazed thousand yard stare would have just got lost into the billions of porn videos online if this ambulance chasing hooknose would have stayed as far far away from the farms as possible.
The Streisand effect is a hilarious phenomenon to observe when it backfires on these double digit IQ specimens. Good job making your clients "make daddy mad" moment the new side project of a thousand weaponized autists for the next six month. Hope you get plenty of billable hours out of it.
 
LOLOL Working in law spectrum myself, this thread is fucking glorious!! A law firm that goes after sites on behalf of people who were stupid on the internet, tackles the Kiwi Farms, with a site owner who told a whole country to fuck off, only to now end up with a thread for the researchers and diggers amongst us to find and post the horrible/idiotic or whatever dumb shit their clients that they represent(ed) did. Something they were hired to stop, exposure on the internet of the depraved and dumb choices their clients made!

I don't know if it is too late for suggesting for the CoTY Awards, but there should be a category for most re.tarded entity or firm. They'd get my vote! Fucking dumbasses, these are a bunch of legal professionals that make Russell Greer look like he should be sitting on the Supreme Court given his vastly superior legal skills and ability!

I can't fathom how they didn't do at least some background research on Kiwi Farms before they decided to take on an untouchable? That would have been like 30 minutes of a paralegal's time to scope out the Farms and draft a memo saying research shows we better not send anything to them! Christchurch in addition to numerous other situations involving Josh and the Farms would clearly have been found with a good search and reading some links/articles.

Guess they just ASSumed the owner would bend knee and beg for mercy! LOL Well fucking done! All their clients who now are being discovered and laughed at here on the Farms should get together and file a class action lawsuit against these bozos!

I have to go back and read this whole thread from the beginning tonite and take it all in again! Has anyone done a search to locate any (all) decisions or filings associated with this firm? I can look into some databases I have access to tonite. I just dont know the depth of what has been done to uncover all this info about people as I was quickly reading the posts and wasn't taking it all in. How are these people being discovered to be clients?

Like someone said above, this firm is a potential goldmine. And they are the biggest nugget of the group!
 
I dont think that people who are paid to dox other people for a living would be easily doxed

Noooo.....the people who are hard to dox are people who post here, with usernames and account info detached from any of their RL info, if not posting behind 7 proxies.

The people who dox for a living by the nature of their work have to leave an active accounting trail that is easy to pick up and match to buisiness and then RL identities.
 
On behalf of 'M.B.', they submitted complaints about two videos which sites described as 'Connecticut girl strips and bates'. The DMCA complaints claim "Videos have never been authorized for distribution"- despite the fact that they were clearly only ever available to be uploaded because they were deliberately distributed by Ms. M.B. as she was camming.
The Connecticut camgirl in question is probably a Melanie Berman. Her Instagram account name was @melanieberman, since deleted. Someone with no moral objections to viewing pornography could confirm that the videos do indeed show her.
artistic_interpretation_melanieberman.jpg
 
Please archive that shit; the Wayback Machine will take down content on the request of the domain owner.

Well that's some bullshit.

I archived a few more :

http://archive.is/wip/n40h312 Sep 2015 08:48:19 UTC
http://archive.is/Z903022 Aug 2015 18:00:09 UTC
http://archive.is/wip/LkhBF7 May 2016 16:24:58 UTC
http://archive.is/n40h312 Sep 2015 08:48:19 UTC
http://archive.is/LkhBF7 May 2016 16:24:58 UTC
http://archive.is/ELAs924 Aug 2016 15:21:25 UTC
http://archive.is/odt5G5 May 2019 13:41:51 UTC
http://archive.is/k5u3B1 Jul 2017 22:31:55 UTC
http://archive.is/8GhfO9 Aug 2018 12:03:33 UTC
 
Please archive that shit; the Wayback Machine will take down content on the request of the domain owner.
That archive.li page looks incomplete. Here's another archive of the 22 August 2019 page. Just to be safe.
https://archive.li/u28Ps

Does this mean Madam Carrie and her girls* are aware of this thread?

* and the black man. Token ciswhite male has a face brought to you by The Power of Soy, so I'm lumping him in with the girls.
 
I think this Carrie Goldberg is thread worthy. So much cringe and arrogance wrapped up int one package. I think she stores the excess of both in her nose judging on its size.
This woman's workspace is horrifying. I can only imagine the smell of the litterboxes in her apartment.
1578824768585.png

https://archive.li/J4qel
She is also an admitted computer hacker. Shocked that the NY bar admits such people.
1578824885573.png

https://archive.li/W1zeE
And she has a real stick up her ass about homosexual men doing homosexual things on Grindr. What gives?
1578824990407.png
 
This woman's workspace is horrifying. I can only imagine the smell of the litterboxes in her apartment.
View attachment 1094957
https://archive.li/J4qel
She is also an admitted computer hacker. Shocked that the NY bar admits such people.
View attachment 1094960
https://archive.li/W1zeE
And she has a real stick up her ass about homosexual men doing homosexual things on Grindr. What gives?
View attachment 1094962
How many packs a day do you have to smoke to get a keyboard and laptop(?) stand like that?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back