2019-12-23 - Lindsay B. Lieberman on behalf of "K.W."

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
this is true, they try to pick women who can't afford to get back home without the $$ from the shoot, and in those cases it is human trafficking. I don't think this applies to KW, but I am also sure that the facial abuse people are scum.
People keep saying that these women are adults, they're 18 years old, by themselves in a room full of men who are practiced at getting women to comply. I'm not saying this is the case with Kelly Wang, but I'm not going to criticise an 18 year old for making shit decisions, when put under that type of pressure.

The best thing Kelly Wang could have done is settle down get a job, and get on with her life. Instead she tried to build a profile for herself in the Art World most likely funded by her fathers money. She got kicked out of College for dealing drugs, yet somehow managed to complete her degree? She's already had more chances than the typical young person gets these days.

For me the real interesting story here is the law firm of C.A. Goldberg, I'm willing to bet their client base consists of just a herd of gullible lolcow's with disposable income.
 
Last edited:
For me the real interesting story here is the law firm of C.A. Goldberg, I'm willing to bet their client base consists of just a herd of gullible lolcow's with disposable income.

They are not all rich. Some are shitty failed science fiction writers

http://archive.li/EusDm

“her firm is deadly effective at combating modern cyberstalkers”


They milked him out of 5k to get his twitter back using them. But he’s broke. He also used to be verified but lost his checkmark after spending 5k.

http://archive.li/dU9vT

he lives in a shithole in Milwaukee. He’s currently fighting some ridiculous battle on twitter against bad reviews of his books on Goodreads.

https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/2...40454545_zpid/

 
Last edited:
People keep saying that these women are adults, they're 18 years old, by themselves in a room full of men who are practiced at getting women to comply. I'm not saying this is the case with Kelly Wang, but I'm not going to criticise an 18 year old for making shit decisions, when put under that type of pressure.

The best thing Kelly Wang could have done is settle down get a job, and get on with her life. Instead she tried to build a profile for herself in the Art World most likely funded by her fathers money. She got kicked out of College for dealing drugs, yet somehow managed to complete her degree? She's already had more chances than the typical young person gets these days.

For me the real interesting story here is the law firm of C.A. Goldberg, I'm willing to bet their client base consists of just a herd of gullible lolcow's with disposable income.

Unless these women are kidnapped and forced into that room against their will, I don't think it's a very valid point.

When i was 18, I spoke with some porn producers because I needed cash and my parents had disowned me thanks to gay. I had met some people in the industry and even the low-tier shit sites have basic due diligence for age. It was a few weeks of emails, phone calls, sharing photos and reviewing the company's work to make sure I understood what would be expected of me before I was even offered an audition. I decided not to go with it because everyone had AIDs and I didn't want AIDs.

Sure, porn is skeezy, but the US is a big place and there's less and less of a need to do the illegal shit that gets you thrown in jail when "barely legal" requires a modicum of due diligence and removes most legal liability. Anyone who claims they were taken advantage of by big bad porn producers is almost certainly a filthy lying whore.
 
Perhaps we can show them how doxing really works?

Just a thought.

Already put some effort in on that part.

New York has the ACRIS system which is used to document property paperwork. The last piece of paperwork with her name on it has her home of record at

Carrie Ann Goldberg

110 Livingston St, Apt. 17L
Brooklyn, NY 11201

Facebook
And she bought a 1966 Pontiac GTO a couple years ago.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Already put some effort in on that part.

New York has the ACRIS system which is used to document property paperwork. The last piece of paperwork with her name on it has her home of record at

Carrie Ann Goldberg

110 Livingston St, Apt. 17L
Brooklyn, NY 11201

Facebook

And she bought a 1966 Pontiac GTO a couple years ago.

Capture.JPG


it is a four minute walk from her law firm to her home. That has to be her current address.
 
Think about how many better ways they had to do this. "Kelly Wang" is not exactly a unique name to begin with. SEO, as someone mentioned, could have buried it fine. DMCA the big players- Pornhub, etc because they're big businesses that won't give a shit about losing a video over a legit copyright issue. Name change, not a bad idea. Lock down social media (unless she's a tard, which she must be) and wait a few years. Some people will still know, of course, but you can never stop that. But what you don't fucking do is indiscriminately start sending legal notices to everyone who might have a photo up there, especially if it doesn't even include her name and ESPECIALLY if it's a site like kiwifarms. They could have spent 5 minutes researching the whole New Zealand bruhaha to figure out that this isn't a hill to fight for.

Makes me wonder how many other socialites have similar videos out there floating around but their rich families aren't stupid enough to hire anyone to do this.

Agree with all of this. I’d also add that aside from the big companies, a polite email explaining why you want something removed will get your content hidden or taken down 90% of the time, especially if it’s something old. The other 10% of the time you will just be ignored. A DMCA should never be the first action for these situations.
 
Already put some effort in on that part.

New York has the ACRIS system which is used to document property paperwork. The last piece of paperwork with her name on it has her home of record at

Carrie Ann Goldberg

110 Livingston St, Apt. 17L
Brooklyn, NY 11201

Facebook
And she bought a 1966 Pontiac GTO a couple years ago.
Damn, whatever we say about her grift- well, it's a hell of a damn grift. Looking at apts. in the neighborhood we're talking 2-5k per month depending on the size. That's enough to pay down a big mortgage on a real house anywhere else.
 
Unless these women are kidnapped and forced into that room against their will, I don't think it's a very valid point.

When i was 18, I spoke with some porn producers because I needed cash and my parents had disowned me thanks to gay. I had met some people in the industry and even the low-tier shit sites have basic due diligence for age. It was a few weeks of emails, phone calls, sharing photos and reviewing the company's work to make sure I understood what would be expected of me before I was even offered an audition. I decided not to go with it because everyone had AIDs and I didn't want AIDs.
If you worked for one of the major gay porn companies they do use pass so it would be the same as straight porn talent. Lesser known companies generally know when they book a performer if he is HIV positive or not. Talent are made aware when booked. If not then, the content provider, director or producer will disclose it.. As a last "safety measure" the two performers will exchange tests or make the other aware if they just contracted the virus recently. Then the non HIV performer is given the option to still shoot the scene wearing a condom (Prep is now widely used to reduce the risk to almost non existent). Non disclosure of a + status would be a career killer. Don't get me wrong I think you made the right choice but even though there is a high percentage of talent who are carriers they are very careful not to infect those who are still clean. 99 out of a 100 times the performer contracted the virus off set.

Sure, porn is skeezy, but the US is a big place and there's less and less of a need to do the illegal shit that gets you thrown in jail when "barely legal" requires a modicum of due diligence and removes most legal liability. Anyone who claims they were taken advantage of by big bad porn producers is almost certainly a filthy lying whore.

In most cases you'd be on point but GDP is not your typical smut peddler. They were considered an amatuer site and took advantage of that. In the GDP lawsuit some girls didn't know they were shooting porn when they got on that plane. Of course 2257 rules were in place but up till episode 380ish std tests were not required. The male talent Dre wore condoms up to that point so the girls would have no reason to think they weren't going to a legit modelling shoot. I mean if it would raise a big red flag if they asked for an std test for a photo shoot lol. That is why all the girls suing are not in the 380 + episode range. Obviously when asked to bring a valid std test they'd know they are going to shoot porn. Girlsdoporn has always been an outsider and never even considered a part of the industry. They ignored the law, kept bending the rules and got away with it for just over ten years. Now, as karma has it they are likely to spend the next ten years in prison. Regards M

P.S. Your parents are fn dicks
 
She will die a cat mom too. Men in her social class can afford to be choosy. And they definitely wont choose some slut with pictures of her taking jizz to the face all over the internet. Just imagine having to explain that at a cocktail charity, or over cigars in the board room. Her only option would be the marry down the social ladder. But she wont.

The fortunes of the entire Kardiashian-Jenner clan started with a sex tape. With the right strategy, she could possibly have established a profile of her own which is high enough to free her from dependence on daddy's trust fund. Instead she has cemented her dependence on daddy.
 
The fortunes of the entire Kardiashian-Jenner clan started with a sex tape. With the right strategy, she could possibly have established a profile of her own which is high enough to free her from dependence on daddy's trust fund. Instead she has cemented her dependence on daddy.

I doubt it. The K-J clan were smart enough to make it seem like the tape was shared without their permission (like Paris Hilton’s). Straight up making porn has already been tried by Lawrence Fishburne’s daughter, who you’ve never heard of.
 
Here's another client of Lieberman- Helen Ingerman.
helen ingerman hoFullSizeRender-2_TRANSFORMATIVE ARTWORK.jpeg

Helen works at JP Morgan & Chase, presumably doing something to destroy the financial integrity of the United States economy (as they have previously done to the US, and as they have done to the economies of Russia and many other countries).

A cursory look indicates that her full name is Helen Margarita wow Ingerman. She may live in an apartment at 111 Worth Street, Tribeca (wonder if they have resident name tags out front?)

Among the sites from which she has requested images be removed is 'reportcheater.com'. Now, there is an obvious implication one can take from this, as she doesn't appear to have any actual refutation of this claim, though I have no personal experience to confirm this, merely the fact that she hires lawyers who file fraudulent DMCA claims. Pintrest. Here's another photo.
 
Among the sites from which she has requested images be removed is 'reportcheater.com'. Now, there is an obvious implication one can take from this, as she doesn't appear to have any actual refutation of this claim, though I have no personal experience to confirm this, merely the fact that she hires lawyers who file fraudulent DMCA claims.

A lot of posts on those sites are just made up by someone who dislikes them, such as this. There's probably some genuine ones there but I wouldn't assume cheating just because she had a page. She'd want it removed whether it was true or not.
 
A lot of posts on those sites are just made up by someone who dislikes them, such as this. There's probably some genuine ones there but I wouldn't assume cheating just because she had a page. She'd want it removed whether it was true or not.
The sheer volume of complaints that she's had this firm submit might suggest otherwise. Besides, if she's a good hearted, decent person, why would she work at JP Morgan?

Another client of C.A. Goldberg Law is Sacheen Nathan. Formerly an assistant professor of medicine at Boston University School of Medicine, she makes a point of jetting round the country killing poor black babies at sites from Jackson, Mississippi, to Alabama.

Her pronouns are 'she/her/hers'.

Sacheen is a very unique name in that it could be either a dot or feather Indian first name, very interesting. If the former, very interesting that she is on the board of US population control organisation 'Population Connection', rather than doing something about her own country. Honestly, looking at her, I have no idea of what she's supposed to be.

Nathan has been involved in suppressing First Amendment permitted protests outside the place where she cracks baby skulls open, colluding with the local PD to have peaceful law-abiding protesters arrested for 'stalking'.

So it's not surprising that she would have a false DMCA filed over a picture of her on Facebook. On the page of, of all people, Sam McClure, a candidate for Attorney General of Alabama and advocate for children and constitutional rights.

It looks like her maiden name is Sacheen Carr-Ellis, and she married Gavin Roger Nathan in Massachusetts around 2010-2011. Her DOB is 1973-04-02, Gavin's is 1974-12-15. They are both registered to vote at 1200 West Ave, Apt 1411, Miami Beach, Florida 33139. They look to have formerly lived at #503 210-216 Lincoln St, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, but she is no longer listed on the Boston U website, and that property is presently on the market (though she is still registered to vote under that address in Massachusetts as well- note that 'double registration' is not a crime while double voting may be).
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back