2020-12-07 - Scott v. Moon Mk VI(?)

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Melinda arguing that Nick just doesn't like pro se litigants because they're competition, while simultaneously demonstrating her ineptitude regarding her own case, live on air.
It's like watching a trainwreck; Dunning-Krüger personified.
And then she wonders why people are paying negative attention to her. Melinda, it's got to be tough to be a moron, that's understandable, and people might even feel sorry for you.
That is not the primary issue, though.
Your biggest problem is that you keep putting your hand on the hot stove. You know, for larping as a oven-dodger, you're not very good at it.
Nobody cares about you, nobody's coming after you. You are simply reaping what you sow.

What is the matter with you that you fail to understand these very plain and simple facts?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: HarveySperg41, Marvin, Troonologist PhD and 5 others
Least Concern said:
Rekieta is currently discussing the case, and Melinda (or at least someone pretending to be her) has been spamming the chat. Nick has invited her to come on the stream. There might be some lols if he's able to get her on.

EDIT: He brought her on. If you're watching the stream after it's finished, she joins in a bit after the two hour mark.
Click to expand...
Ralph has been arrested and Melinda’s gone on Rekeita’s show? What is going on with the cows? Has anyone checked on Chris? :stress:
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: ⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛, Troonologist PhD, Mushroom Tip and 4 others
I haven't watched it yet... does she accidentally admit that it's her posting on Kiwi Farms and not her dumb story about a Private Investigator?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Anne Hyroe
tfw she tells you it's not kosher
1608138266877.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: AStupidMonkey, Marvin, mindlessobserver and 4 others
lolwatagain said:
I feel bad for the Court Clerks and Judges who have to deal with this shit. Batshit insane Pro-se plaintiffs are entertaining to watch, but frustrating to deal with.
Click to expand...
I agree, but also to be fair it's the judge and the clerk who have the ability to say no to pro-se plaintiffs. Like every other time this happened. That they allowed this to get in front of a bench at all is a sign they weren't paying attention.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Apteryx Owenii, Drowningman, Troonologist PhD and 1 other person
Shaka Brah said:
I agree, but also to be fair it's the judge and the clerk who have the ability to say no to pro-se plaintiffs. Like every other time this happened. That they allowed this to get in front of a bench at all is a sign they weren't paying attention.
Click to expand...
True, they should have dismissed it during the IFP request. It was clear that WCDSS had Sovereign Immunity and that the rest of the complaint was horseshit.
 
HeadbuttEnthusiast said:
Has the judge offered any explanation as to why he allowed this one to proceed farther than her previous filings against Null?
Click to expand...

I don't think we'll hear any formal explanation for it until the judge actually rules on Null's motions, but the simplest explanation that makes sense is: the clerk erroneously signed off on the service being correct, Null didn't respond to the service (since he hadn't been served), the court rules that he loses by default since he didn't respond. If Null had actually been served correctly, the results would've almost certainly been identical to the last ones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drowningman and Useful_Mistake
I can't imagine said:
I don't think we'll hear any formal explanation for it until the judge actually rules on Null's motions, but the simplest explanation that makes sense is: the clerk erroneously signed off on the service being correct, Null didn't respond to the service (since he hadn't been served), the court rules that he loses by default since he didn't respond. If Null had actually been served correctly, the results would've almost certainly been identical to the last ones.
Click to expand...
That's exactly it as far as I can tell. Some clerk said it was valid service and the judge didn't check (because it's not his job) so the default judgment was entered. The entire reason this is in court to begin with is an administrative fuckup, otherwise it would have been thrown out.

And that's the worst part of the system really. Because these people with unlimited time to waste will keep wasting it until someone messes up and they get their day in court.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: AmateurComedicTaxidermist, Drowningman, Useful_Mistake and 2 others
Shaka Brah said:
That's exactly it as far as I can tell. Some clerk said it was valid service and the judge didn't check (because it's not his job) so the default judgment was entered. The entire reason this is in court to begin with is an administrative fuckup, otherwise it would have been thrown out.
Click to expand...
It actually wasn't a default judgement, it was only a clerk's entry of default. To get a default judgement she'd have still had to argue her case, show damages, and have it ruled on its merits.

From docket item 28 (Order to Respond):

1608238456338.png

1608238473994.png
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Make Anime Illegal, AStupidMonkey, Next Task and 3 others
Kosher Salt said:
It actually wasn't a default judgement, it was only a clerk's entry of default. To get a default judgement she'd have still had to argue her case, show damages, and have it ruled on its merits.

From docket item 28 (Order to Respond):

View attachment 1794801
View attachment 1794802
Click to expand...
She wouldn't be able to prove damages.

The 5th amendment cause of action should be laughed out of court, and she hasn't properly pled IFED because there is no evidence of an accompanying physical injury or required medical treatment or hospitalization. In other words, there's no evidence of actual severe distress.

Also, speaking of crazy lawsuits filed by crazy assholes, Utah still hasn't decided if it's going to serve Null with Greer's complaint yet. I'm betting they won't but this crazy shit was allowed to continue, so who fucking knows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drowningman, Useful_Mistake, Shaka Brah and 1 other person
lolwatagain said:
The 5th amendment cause of action should be laughed out of court, and she hasn't properly pled IFED because there is no evidence of an accompanying physical injury or required medical treatment or hospitalization. In other words, there's no evidence of actual severe distress.
Click to expand...
Cunt is so "distressed" she comes here and chimps out every day.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Coleslaw, Pee Cola, AStupidMonkey and 11 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back