Jannetje Schaft
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 14, 2021
Also, Heyman is an IRL actual jew.Paul Heyman still managed to make something good. Melinda Scott is just trash.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Also, Heyman is an IRL actual jew.Paul Heyman still managed to make something good. Melinda Scott is just trash.
She files on her own, so no lawyers, and always applies for pauper status or whatever, so her filing fees are always waved. It's tax dollars paying for her side of it.The real winners are the lawyers that keep accepting her payments. She's had to waste 10s of thousands of dollars by now.
Why are you autistically disagreeing with everyone? The first page of the fucking dismissal even says she's a pro se litigant who files in forma pauperis.The real winners are the lawyers that keep accepting her payments. She's had to waste 10s of thousands of dollars by now.
Why are you autistically disagreeing with everyone? The first page of the fucking dismissal even says she's a pro se litigant who files in forma pauperis.
Everything is coming up Moon it seemsView attachment 2495363View attachment 2495362View attachment 2495361
Dismissed with prejudice. If she pursues again in another jurisdiction I will press for attorney's fees and I'll hire Ethan Ralph to be my debt collector.
YOU LOST JOSHUA MOON
YOU FAILED JOSHUA MOON
YOU'RE DUMB JOSHUA MOON
YOU'RE THE DUMBEST LITIGANT EVER JOSHUA MOON
YOU'RE A FAILURE JOSHUA MOON
I'm honestly surprised this wasn't done yet, as well as pressing for aemulatio (abuse of the right) presumption for all of her further lawsuits, so she will have to fight against the presumption of her lawsuit being letigious every time- US law has this system, right?If she pursues again in another jurisdiction I will press for attorney's fees
In the US the system that applies that sort of status is at the discretion of the judge to hand out. I'm not sure if a person can countersue to make someone a vexatious litigant, but I don't think it can be done.I'm honestly surprised this wasn't done yet, as well as pressing for aemulatio (abuse of the right) presumption for all of her further lawsuits, so she will have to fight against the presumption of her lawsuit being letigious every time- US law has this system, right?
Yes, but it's rarely done, and you have to piss off the court extremely. There are exceptions, of course, like Utah, where it is a lot easier.so she will have to fight against the presumption of her lawsuit being letigious every time- US law has this system, right?
In the US the system that applies that sort of status is at the discretion of the judge to hand out. I'm not sure if a person can countersue to make someone a vexatious litigant, but I don't think it can be done.
I see, so this pretty much the same as in 99% of the world- you need to piss off the judge, otherwise they dont care how much inconviniences lawsuites cause to the defendant.Yes, but it's rarely done, and you have to piss off the court extremely. There are exceptions, of course, like Utah, where it is a lot easier.