2021-04-07 - Patrick Sean Tomlinson subpoenas Cloudflare

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
So if I'm reading all this correctly, this whole mess is a perfect storm of idiocy between boomer judges making decisions where they have zero understanding of whats going on, fatrick being a butthurt bitch, shyster lawyers doing what they do and cloudflare being pussies. Fuck this gay world.
 
How do you sue anons, maybe I'm just stupid but what can he get asides from IP addresses?
The judge has allowed them, on a whim after originally saying he needed time to consider, to subpoena ISPs for user information regarding any IPs they find. Though a wrench was thrown in Fatrick's hot hot doXXXing plan because the judge said the information can't be disseminated. None of the supporting cases they cited in their motion came from Wisconsin and the judge just said "ah fuck it".
 
any personal info put on the site, as well as e-mails, presumably, and if those e-mails can be traced, can then be used to identify the person*

*i think
I still can't get over how people would use their regular personal emails for this site. Josh even gives you the option when you make an account to use a custom free fake one, it's the easiest thing in the world.
 
The judge has allowed them, on a whim after originally saying he needed time to consider, to subpoena ISPs for user information regarding any IPs they find. Though a wrench was thrown in Fatrick's hot hot doXXXing plan because the judge said the information can't be disseminated. None of the supporting cases they cited in their motion came from Wisconsin and the judge just said "ah fuck it".
I'm also wondering what he hopes to achieve.

"Your honor, passyslaya69 called me a fat kissless virgin whose only hope of getting his dick wet is raping babies of ethic minorities"
"Ok...what the fuck do you want the court to do about it?"

Can this honestly lead to some kind of defamation decision in favor or the drooling fatass?
 
Can this honestly lead to some kind of defamation decision in favor or the drooling fatass?
The ona subreddit/forum has given him farrr more attention than KF. I have no idea if anything they did has constituted a tort, but Fatrick has decided to spend money on what looks like a fishing expedition to me. According to ona, he is broke and paying for this all with a covid loan meant for small businesses. The whole situation is, of course, retarded.

To elaborate a little bit; the Judge Ashley had missed the motion to subpoena the ISP for account information based on IPs and hadn't read it when asked about it near the end of the hearing. He mentioned earlier in the hearing during scheduling that he doesn't like cases just sitting around on his docket without hearings. The general feeling I get reading about previous hearings is that he likes his cases to move and this one is sitting around in all kinds of limbo. It hasn't even addressed the issue of jurisdiction once defendants are identified. Initially he wanted to schedule a hearing for the motion to subpoena ISPs and then reconsidered as he talked things through with Fatrick's lawyers. He got flustered because asking the clerk to schedule the hearing had taken them off the record before he then ruled to allow the subpoenas. He had to go back on the record and go over it again.

It appeared to me that Judge Ashley weighed Resto and Ways' nonexistent legal argument to the ISP subpoenas against his desire to get this case moving. He wasn't prepared because he had missed the motion.
 
Last edited:
any personal info put on the site, as well as e-mails, presumably, and if those e-mails can be traced, can then be used to identify the person*

*i think
Ha! That's cute; he thinks anyone here uses their e-mail addresses as anything more than identification. That's all my addresses are. I have never once sent a single mail from any of them. They're for necessity's sake, nothing more.
 
I still can't get over how people would use their regular personal emails for this site. Josh even gives you the option when you make an account to use a custom free fake one, it's the easiest thing in the world.
I saw someone as recently as a month ago join with the same username & avatar combo he used everywhere, including on G+ where he had his real name for everyone to see. I'd imagine he uses the same personal, traceable e-mail account too. Never underestimate retards.
 
I'm also wondering what he hopes to achieve.

"Your honor, passyslaya69 called me a fat kissless virgin whose only hope of getting his dick wet is raping babies of ethic minorities"
"Ok...what the fuck do you want the court to do about it?"

Can this honestly lead to some kind of defamation decision in favor or the drooling fatass?
Does he even want to actually win? Or is he just using the legal system as dahxxxing tool by hiring competent enough counsel not to have his shit dismissed?

I guess if even Legal Smeagol can appear to state a claim these days, nool will need more merch runs going forward. *sigh*
 
If #6 is true @Null, would that actually be grounds for YOU to sue Cloudflare for handing that information out without a care for your personal privacy?

Because if this fat fuck actually DID pick out his 60 targets already, then odds are good that a motion to remand to Federal court should be on the table anyway. Odds are good that all 60 of the targets live outside of WI anyway, and if the thread consensus is true, he did file this motion just to dox (or attempt to dox) us.
AFAIK, the Does are spread throughout the three sites he listed, though he hasn't identified them publicly, or indeed actually subpoenaed their information yet (I don't think Cloudflare would know the IPs associated with specific users on this forum, so they'd have to subpoena Null for that, and he hasn't mentioned it so far). Presumably he has a list in mind, though it might be flexible; I think the "Does 1-60" part is just an estimate and not a hard and fast number, but I'm not a lawyer so I don't know how literal that number actually is.
 
Update: I have retained counsel in Wisconsin and filed as an Intervener to quash the subpoena, but their Counsel is boasting that they have records about my Cloudflare account going back to 2014 (when we started using it, indicating Cloudflare never purges records).

View attachment 2109105View attachment 2109106

Which, if true, means:
1. This person sued 60 anonymous people,
2. He petitioned the court to give him subpoenas for O&A Forum, ED, and the Kiwi Farms to identify the owners of those sites,
3, The Judge granted it,
4. Cloudflare emailed me to notify that I had 10 days to file a motion to quash,
5. When asked to extend, they gave 10 more days,
6. They might have just given it over anyways even though we filed on time.

🤷 Every day I'm a citizen of the United States of America I feel more disadvantaged than the day before.
As I'm a simpleton, I have to ask the following: so according to the D team, Cloudlfare handed over the goods on you from all the way back in 2014, or on the first ~39 users of Patrick's original thread all the way back from 2014, or did they, according to the D team, hand over EVERYTHING from 2014, including every user's information?

Because if it's the latter, then that's fucked and seems wildly illegal. It almost seems actionable, as the entirety of site data is not relevant to his case involving the first ~39 users of the original thread. Not that having your information would be either.

And if the counsel is found to be lying about this, then is that actionable too?

Fortunately and unfortunately for Patrick S. Tomlinson, we live in a highly litigious society. It'd be a real damn shame if this backfired on him in ways beyond his finances, and managed to blow up in his attorneys' faces as well.

Is there a way to get in contact with you that is not seen by Cloudflare? I want you to use all the money I paid for the silver coins to pay for your legal expenses. I'd give up the chance to own silver autism coins just to smack Patrick in his fat face with his own lawsuit. It may not be much, but it'll get you another few minutes of your attorney's time.

Edit:

I would like to add that Patrick probably ate the lunchmeat, because pigs are scavengers and take opportunities to feast on anything they can find - even refuse.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back