I'm bored. I'll answer some questions asked by this well-meaning, kind and objective journalist.
Is it accurate to say that 1776 Solutions began as “Final Solutions”?
If you are implying that a hosting company was supposed to be a vesicle for genocide, I can't imagine how that's supposed to work.
And how would you describe the purpose of the website?
Mainly to observe, document, discuss and gossip about very public antics of e-celebrities.
Do you have examples of stopping behavior on the website?
In my experience any kind of encouragement of directly contacting people discussed on the site is shunned, criticized by the community and deleted by moderation.
With the knowledge that Kiwi Farms has been blamed for harassing people to the point of suicide, why do you run the website?
With the knowledge that Ali Breland has been blamed for defaming people and knowingly presenting false narratives, why do you continue being a journalist?
See how it works? Being blamed doesn't mean being responsible.
Is it accurate to say that Kiwi Farms kept any kind of “kill count” formally, or informally by users in posts that referenced suicides it helped encourage?
"Kill count" is meant to mock people falsely attributing suicides to the forum, like you will likely do in your article.
Did you do anything to discourage this kill count?
Redundant and already answered. The forum doesn't have any real kill count and moderation actively removes any form of encouragement of directly contacting people outside of the forum.
Did you do anything as a moderator to stop users from posting information about users, and further harassment, that led to suicides?
Redundant and already answered. Twice. The forum doesn't have any real kill count and moderation actively removes any form of encouragement of directly contacting people outside of the forum.
What is your response to Kiwi Farms' alleged encouragement of the suicide of Chloe Sagal?
Chloe Sagal was a person suffering from severe mental illness that lead to suicide. Weaponizing a suicide of someone who left a manifesto discussing their mental struggle to further your narrative is repulsive and vile and you should be ashamed of yourself.
What is your response to Kiwi Farms' alleged encouraging of the suicide of Julie Terryberry?
Julie Terryberry was a victim of an abuser. Weaponizing suicide of a victim of domestic violence is repulsive and vile and you should be ashamed of yourself.
Kiwi Farms worked to get her social media accounts shut down while mocking her mental health struggles?
Deplatforming people is against forum's philosophy.
What is your response to Kiwi Farms' alleged encouraging of the suicide of David Ginder?
No proof of David Ginder suicide was provided. David Ginder is probably alive.
Did Kiwi Farms relentlessly bully Ginder for being non-binary?
Being non-binary is never a reason to have a thread on Kiwi Farms. Being an adult wearing diapers for sexual gratification... yes, that's funny and interesting.
Did one thread went on for more than a dozen pages before Ginder's death?
Alleged death.
One page over a dozen, to be specific. Over a rather long period of time. Ginder wasn't very interesting to the community.
Users on the website have celebrated the deaths of so-called “lolcows.” How would you respond to this?
With this post:
It's more genuine and heartfelt than anything I've ever heard from people trying to pin it on the forum.
Experts and targets have said that Kiwi Farms users have systematically attempted to cause suicides. How do you respond to this?
Assuming no bad faith: they are wrong.
Probably: they lie.
Did you take part in harassment campaigns on Kiwi Farms?
Gossiping and reposting publicly available information is not harassment.
You posted on Kiwi Farms and other forums information about Chris Chan that has been described as abuse. Do you deny this?
You confuse Joshua Moon with Joshua Wise. Wise is a person you should look into if you actually want to do something good for the Internet.
Did Kiwi Farms users attempt to SWAT Marjorie Taylor Greene?
Most likely not, if a user of the forum is responsible they were not identified, KiwiFarms community is very critical of such behavior.
Did Kiwi Farms users attempt to SWAT the Twitch streamer Keffals?
Most likely not, if a user of the forum is responsible they were not identified, KiwiFarms community is very critical of such behavior.
An anonymous target of Kiwi Farms claims the forum’s users “SIM-jacked” them, among other abuses. Do you deny that Kiwi Farms has used this technique?
Any form of direct interaction with people discussed on the forum is shunned.
Kiwi Farms users have been reported to have stalked, harassed, SWAT-ed, defamed, cyberstalked, sent messages encouraging self-harm, and doxed people. Is that accurate?
It isn't. Users planning such activities on the forum or admitting to them would likely be banned.
Kiwi Farms users target specifically the vulnerable and marginalized—homeless, transgender, and neurodivergent people. Why is that?
Kiwi Farms discusses and gossips about eccentric people active in public space. It includes politicians (
Donald Trump), celebrities (
Madonna), celebrities who want to be politicians (
Ye), journalists (
Ben Collins), pundits (
Nick Fuentes), gaming streamers (
Phil Burnell) - all those people are very successful in their respective fields, you really can't call them marginalized.
A Twitter biography of Kiwi Farms described the website as such: ““Gossip and exploitation of mentally handicapped for amusement purposes.” Why did the website describe itself this way?
Why do you describe yourself as a journalist? Because it's an accurate description, for better or worse in both cases.
Have you ever interacted directly with Kiwi Farms targets?
Some people of interest have accounts on the forum. Of course we interact with them, would be rude to ignore them.
Do Kiwi Farms users ever target journalists who report on the website?
If you mean making threads about them, gossiping about them and making fun of them, then
yes.
Is it accurate to call your politics far-right? If not, how would you describe them?
I would describe myself (myself, not Null) as a centrist. By what I mean that in my opinion both sides of the political discourse are awful.
Users on Kiwi Farms describe themselves as “autists.” Why do you think that is?
Because some users here are autistic. What's more some are gay, some are trans, some are liberal, some are conservative - it's probably the most diverse community on the Internet.
The fact that I'm responding to questions that you never asked me and you'll probably never read my answers should tell you everything.
Do you think users on Kiwi Farms target trans people and others who are marginalized because they see themselves in people who are lonely and struggling?
As said before, users of Kiwi Farms users enjoy gossiping about all types of people. Do you think we talk about Madonna because we see ourselves in her? Or, God forbid, in Ben Collins?
Do you deny that Kiwi Farms users have cheered for a target’s dog to die? And that this was in the hope that someone would commit suicide?
If there is something most users of the forum agree on is our stance against pedophilia and against hurting animals.
Maybe you would like to reach out to
those lovely people "targeted" by Kiwi Farms?
