Approved 2024-07-25 - Stebbins: DMCA via Gimp Slave

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Do we intervene?

  • WARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!! WAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!

    Votes: 819 37.3%
  • nah

    Votes: 1,377 62.7%

  • Total voters
    2,196
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Null

Ooperator
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Hello gamers,

A few months ago we raised over $150,000 for various litigations I am defending against and would like to pursue. I advise that we are directly involved in two ongoing litigation, and I am using this trust to help fund one abroad which is directly relevant to our long-term prospects.

Today, in my inbox, and not the inbox of my registered DMCA agent, I received a DMCA complaint from Jarrod Jones.

DMCA Takedown Request-1.png

You see, four years ago a misery golem living in Arkansas filed a copyright complaint against a broke imbecile named Jarrod Jones.

3435912-313efbbf09f7bafe1ae87366c29c4aa3.jpg

Despite having zero value and a negative total contribution to society, this menace can file costly litigation against anyone at any time. He studies the law merely to file competent enough litigation for the sake of passing smell tests and costs victims thousands of dollars. He is also suing Lolcow LLC in its home state of West Virginia to avoid his vexatious litigation status in Arkansas.

Jarrod Jones, idiot, represented himself pro se against this goblin and after years of ridiculous pro se filings the California Courts kicked it to a lower court and asked them to settle if possible. Jarrod, an idiot who buried himself, agreed to settlement with the misery golem.

C.D.Cal._8_24-cv-01486-JVS-KES_78_0-1.pngC.D.Cal._8_24-cv-01486-JVS-KES_78_0-2.png

This effectively means two things:

1) Jarrod Jones owes Stebbins $1,800 over 18 months, or $18,000 over 18 months if he ever gets a job.
2) Jarrod Jones is Stebbins slave.

This settlement, without exaggeration, forms an indentured servitude contract with Jarrod Jones and Stebbins, which is not permitted under the 13th Amendment because he has not been convicted of any crime.

Jarrod is obligated to send DMCA takedown notices on Stebbins's behalf. In 2 hours after their settlement, the misery golem directed his gimp slave to DMCA us, making us a directly impacted party of this mess. It is apparent to me that misery golem wanted this settlement with this slavery clause so he could bypass his own status as a vexatious litigant in Arkansas and continue to spread misery through his proxy slave boy.


We have the option to sue Stebbins. Kind of. We would be an intervener in the case and we would be raising similar arguments that this is a retarded settlement and it's now directly impacting us.


Pros
  • This is a fight for truth, justice, and the American way.
  • Declawing Stebbins is a direct benefit to us because the misery golem recently decided he's just going to sue us forever.
  • Fuck that fat retard.
Cons
  • Costs money.
  • We're already involved in 3 other lawsuits.
  • Jarrod Jones is not really that sympathetic of a victim.
  • Some users of this website support repealing the 13th amendment.
  • Entering litigation voluntarily is generally considered "fucking retarded" in legal circles.

Discuss.



1722026285770.png
 
Last edited:
What exactly is the Farms' stake in this? How much of a threat/nuisance is he to warrant this? He seems like some fucking nobody, picking fights with someone else and occasionally throwing a potshot your way. Just confused as to whether ignoring his requests will actually amount to anything because it seems strange to intervene in someone else's case.
 
While I do empathise with Jarrod Jones, sometimes you need to pick your battle carefully. As you said, you are in three cases already which do not sound like they will end soon. Is it worth voluntarily jumping into another or biding your time for when you need to act in a more stern manner?

tldr; don't need to win the battle to win the war
 
We have the option to sue Stebbins. Kind of. We would be an intervener in the case and we would be raising similar arguments that this is a retarded settlement and it's now directly impacting us.
This suit is retarded, and I have low hopes. Zander, despite being a nice fellow, is also retarded.

That said, Acerthorn doesn't deserve the win, and Zander doesn't deserve to be enslaved by the retarded settlement he reached. I am for intervention IF it doesn't negatively affect our ability to litigate the other two cases.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back