2025-07-25 - OFCOM: "Ofcom engagement - Availability of KiwiFarms in UK"

I think he (Null) might've expected a response from Ofcom on the deadline but since nothing has happened yet we all got blueballed. Ofcom might send him an threatening email today, or maybe the overworked internet-policeman overlooking his site has totally checked out and they're going to procrastinate and get back to Null on Monday.
united-kingdom-engraving-of-a-caricature-by-robert-sayer-showing-a-man-shouting-into-another.webp
SORRY, WE CAN'T HEAR YOU SO WELL FROM OVER THE POND! YOU'LL HAVE TO SPEAK LOUDER!
 
If there was ever a V for Vendetta situation in the UK, it'd be to ensure that the Quran, subversive art and homoerotic photography is readily available. Just like in muh telly. So, wake up, britbongs. Wake up and smell the ashes.
Migrant hotel protests spread nationwide Demonstrations take place in Leeds, Southampton and Nottinghamshire on Saturday, with more planned for Sunday
Migrant hotel protests spread across Britain on Saturday as public anger grew over illegal immigration.
In Norwich, hundreds of Union Flag-waving locals gathered outside the Brook Hotel to demand its closure.
There were also protests in Leeds, Southampton and Nottinghamshire, with more planned for Sunday.
The Nottinghamshire protest was mostly peaceful although there was a brief confrontation involving pro-migrant counter-demonstrators.
Masked counter-protesters broke away from the main group – some of whom carried Stand Up to Racism placards – and walked into the middle of the crowd before being escorted away by police.

Female protesters in Norwich told The Telegraph that the migrant hotel made them fear for their safety because two former residents had been jailed for sex offences in the past three months.
Dan Tesfalul, an Eritrean, was sentenced to eight years for raping a woman in Norwich in April. In June, Rashid Al-Waeli, from Yemen, was sentenced to 20 months for child sex offences after he sent sexual messages to a paedophile hunter he believed was a 14-year-old boy.
Sophie, a 20-year-old who declined to give her surname, said: “It is absolutely petrifying. Go back to the early 2000s when women would walk home from the pub at night alone.
“I would not even think about doing that now. You just don’t know who is hiding in a bush and it is getting more and more common. It’s scary.”
Louis Bunn, 26, waved a Union Flag as he said he was “so scared” for the future of his six-year-old daughter because of the hotel.
“I am not fascist,” he said. “I am not far-Right. I used to vote for the Labour Party.
“But please, all of us need to come together. All of us British – white, brown, black, whatever colour you are, whatever faith you are, whatever race you are – you need to come down here and protect our f---ing children, because this is getting mental.”

At the protest crowds chanted “Keir Starmer is a w----r” as cars beeped their horns as they drove by.
The demonstration was led by Armed Forces veterans who had camped overnight outside the Brook Hotel.

‘Women and children are not safe’​

Ian Curry, who served in Northern Ireland and Kuwait in the Royal Marines from 1987 to 1999, said the public needed to “wake up” and demand the closure of the hotels.
Women and children are not safe in this country,” the 58-year-old said. “This is what the demonstration was for. Where’s all the money for these hotels coming from? It’s coming from us.”
Callum Creak, 23, added: “You just hear horror story after horror story. It’s despicable stuff and surely it’s right to support shutting the hotels down. It should be a bipartisan issue.”
Protests also took place in Leeds, West Yorkshire, on Saturday as demonstrators shouted “back in your rubber dinghies” to asylum seekers in the Britannia Hotel.
Demonstrations were also held outside the hotel on Friday night.
In addition to the protests in Bournemouth, Southampton and Sutton-in-Ashfield, demonstrations are also planned on Sunday in Epping in Essex, Wolverhampton and Altrincham in Cheshire.

Police have made 18 arrests and charged seven people in connection with successive demonstrations at Epping. Disorder first erupted there earlier in July after an asylum seeker was charged with sexual assault, he is alleged to have attempted to kiss a 14-year-old girl.
Epping Forest district council passed a motion on Thursday to call on the Government “to immediately and permanently close” the hotel “for the purposes of asylum processing”.
Protests also took place this week outside the four-star Britannia Hotel in Canary Wharf, to which the Home Office plans to send asylum seekers.
Some 32,000 asylum seekers are being housed in around 210 hotels across Britain, according to the latest Home Office data from March 2025.
A record 24,000 migrants have crossed the Channel so far in 2025, up 50 per cent.
A spokesman for Norfolk Constabulary said it had arrested two people on Saturday on suspicion of affray following protests at the Brook Hotel earlier in the week.
If people weren't doing anything, the government wouldn't be so afraid to to push for this legislation anyway.
The American perception of Brits being kowtowed and fucked is what ironically brightens my view of the French and Germans, since if we're perceived as fucked despite positive reaction and action taking place within, then my perception of them being fucked is just as likely to be wrong.

We're all gonna make it.
*shudder* If you know, you know.
Still the only episode of Black Mirror I've ever watched.
 
One of the reasons that this got pushed for so hard is because the establishment in the UK knows it's on borrowed time. Labor didn't get in with a mandate, they got in because the Tories imploded, and they've since gone forward with a brick on the accelerator because they know that this situation will not last - best for them to push through every pipe dream they've ever had because fixing it will take infinitely more effort than preventing it would have.

The problem is that this raised the water temperature much too high - the frog noticed and decided to hop out.

They were basically recently forced to shut down one of their precious migrant hotels after one of their local pets decided they were going to sexually assault multiple children. Despite the police doing what the police do in the UK, they couldn't shut down the protests, and their attempts to corral the situation blossomed it into a full-scale riot. And Epping is kind of light compared to where some of the more recent bugaboos went down.

I kinda agree with @>IMPLYING - we're likely all gonna make it.
 
I'll replicate a message I wrote in the MATI thread about this whole topic:
Isn't it funny how YouTube, Discord and Spotify magically all roll out facial ID scanning faggot shit simultaneously? Almost like they've been expecting a major western government to lose their shit over Discord grooming gangs and having 5 dimensional nigger advertisements beamed into toddler's eyeballs 24/7.

You know what this means? Not a conspiracy to push control or ban VPNs but rather that every single executive and shareholder at Google, Meta, Apple, Microsoft, Discord etc all knew that their massive financial returns were coming from advertising at a prolific scale to children (including basically subliminal advertising and every other ethical breach you can think of) as well as allowing for shit like child grooming (Discord in particular)

This makes me interested to know if YouTube and certain other services are even sustainable without retard kids watching all of the nigger ads 24/7, somehow I doubt it. I mean if you peal things back further do people think Mr. Beast and the rest of the shitty slop entertainment is even profitable?

The only reason these companies grew so fast, so big is because there were literally no rules and the ones you'd think people would have morals about (like advertising to kids) they skipped over. We're told Kiwifarms is the absolute devil of the internet, meanwhile every major company has basically been the military industrial complex of advertising to kids on the internet.
 
Britbongs can access Chaturbate, Eporner and YouPorn, but apparently a website that calls people fat is a bridge too far.
I like how they just have to make shit up against us. Yes, we do make fun of everyone. Including ourselves. We use harsh language and expose public information into an easier to find and read format. None of this is illegal, we just say things and collect public things.
At worst, some retard touches the poo and actually goes and harasses someone, but its obvious not all of us condone that. I personally don't, that's retarded and not funny at that point, you're just being psychotic.
 
If people weren't doing anything, the government wouldn't be so afraid to to push for this legislation anyway.
The American perception of Brits being kowtowed and fucked is what ironically brightens my view of the French and Germans, since if we're perceived as fucked despite positive reaction and action taking place within, then my perception of them being fucked is just as likely to be wrong.
I do not know for Germany but I am quite sure another kind of Yellow Jacket is bound to happens in the next decade. I do not know what will trigger it but it will happen eventually if our dear elites refuse to listen closely and do something to fix things.

If Macron or another retard decide to pass such draconian censorous laws then big protests will erupt, as always in this country, but I am doubtful it will be as big as the first yellow Jacket protests. After all what triggered it was something a bit more vital to the large majority of the population, aka creating one tax on the price of gas for bullshit reasons.
Maybe we will have to go through Mélanchon(anti-white, far-left, Pieds Noirs, islamogauchiste, faggot) as a President to give us another shock. Maybe it will be Macron attempting a third term. Maybe it will be a scandal about some algerian rape-gangs or another terror attack. Maybe it will be another ridiculous taxe imposed on us.

I know for sure I will get out of my corner to protest(and maybe more, who knows) for the first time in my life if they try to fuck what little internet I can use freely.
 
I like how they just have to make shit up against us. Yes, we do make fun of everyone. Including ourselves. We use harsh language and expose public information into an easier to find and read format. None of this is illegal, we just say things and collect public things.
At worst, some retard touches the poo and actually goes and harasses someone, but its obvious not all of us condone that. I personally don't, that's retarded and not funny at that point, you're just being psychotic.
I like the delicious, palpable subtext that the British quite literally invented this concept:
1753958795141.webp
1753958834485.webp

So I guess in theory they could make this website "illegal" and then someone could just go print out parts of the website and read them verbatim in public and nothing would happen? (although supposedly laws against profanity and such still technically apply)
 
since when American companies have to follow any other country's laws
Real talk? Since globalism made those companies do business in other countries. X is beholden to British laws cause Brits use it. Or at least that's the theory the tinpot dictators trying to crack down on their citizens only to realize the Big-I-Internet makes that pretty fucking hard.
 
Even a jeet Sikh is a Sikh first. They don't really deserve to be lumped in with street shitters.
Raja's a Muslim, but he's basically what you'd hope/expect other Muslims would do: he wants to root out the paedos in his religious community. He isn't part of their tribe so he doesn't have any clan loyalty to them like the Mirpuri/Kashmiri gangsters do to each other, and he doesn't want his religion used as a cover for noncing, drug dealing and political corruption. He sometimes comes across a bit tinfoil hat, but it's not schizophrenia when there really IS a conspiracy, and he's shown all the receipts when it comes to paedo gangs and drug gangs in Oldham.
 
I like how they just have to make shit up against us. Yes, we do make fun of everyone. Including ourselves. We use harsh language and expose public information into an easier to find and read format. None of this is illegal, we just say things and collect public things.
At worst, some retard touches the poo and actually goes and harasses someone, but its obvious not all of us condone that. I personally don't, that's retarded and not funny at that point, you're just being psychotic.
The cow tippers usually end up meeting the ban hammer at some point so it's not like this website is totally out of control anything goes wild west as it's portrayed by retards.
 
The ultimatum has passed.

Have redcoats been deployed to Serbia?
Is Josh going to get shot in his feeding dungeon?
Remember, t he absolute worst thing you can do as a tyrant is give a command that won't be obeyed.

So I guess in theory they could make this website "illegal" and then someone could just go print out parts of the website and read them verbatim in public and nothing would happen? (although supposedly laws against profanity and such still technically apply)
You'd think so, but they banned the Native British from noticing things or god forbid talking about things.

LIke how their government knew and benefited from Paki rape gangs raping, sex trafficking, and pimping out their 8 year old daughters for 40+ years and it was only a problem when people got pissed enough to try and stop i t

Nowadays Speakers Corner exists so Muslims can stomp around playing Islamic call to prayer at 120db 24x7 and the Native British can be arrested if they complain or beat to death if they try and speak out against it.
 
Sorry for the double-post, but evidence to my theory of Null not doing the funny yesterday because Ofcom couldn't be arsed gets a little more evidence because Ofcom opened up 4 simultaneous investigations into 4 other non-compliant entities this morning and so never got back to him as a consequence (unless they do so later today).
1753965414602.webp
Keep in mind, most of the investigations Ofcom opened up in June, most notably 4chan, have still yet to conclude.
1753965548005.webp1753965608706.webp
 
Back