2025-07-25 - OFCOM: "Ofcom engagement - Availability of KiwiFarms in UK"

Ok, I have read this thing like 5 times and I don't get it.
Its only half of an ultimatum. Am I missing something?
Where is the "Or else what?" I could be slow, but everyone in the thread feels like they see something I do not, genuinely.
Block UK citizens by the 30th...Or what? They will do it for you? academics plz respond!
This is from before, but the implication is that they will arrest him.
 
I've been having fun setting my VPN to the UK the past few days trying to see what I can find as a sign of the restrictions. So far it has just been porn sites being blocked or wanting ID. None of the other stuff reported so I'm not sure if it is dodging it over the VPN somehow or just not fully enforced yet.
How royal of them.
 
IMG_2800.webp
 
I wonder how much money they are spending on "monitoring" websites.
What an autistic faggot caliphate country.
View attachment 7710342
They quite literally have their police monitor social media for anti-migrant or racist posts instead of, you know, trying to stop crime outside. UK is not a serious country, it is a shithole and in a more civilized time, they would already be conquered over the course of a weekend by some rogue militia. Their police are literal faggots, their army now recruits faggots and trannies so they are not any better and SAS are overrated pussies. There is not a single real "man" on that shithole island to defend it, not even when their kids are turned into kebab and the police do nothing to stop it even when they know.
 
View attachment 7710278
If the contents of a website are not allowed in a country then that country is responsible for preventing it from being accessed by the people under it's legal jurisdiction. This is retarded as shit and shows that the UK government is lazy (something we should all know by now)
Probably a mix of laziness and lack of coordination between ISPs, which can probably be attributed to laziness. They want to do what China did (The Great Firewall), but are taking a whack-a-mole approach that pushes the responsibility to webhosts because....IDK. It's technically easier to filter at the national ISP's gateway. It's logistically easier to filter at the national ISP's gateway. It's bureaucratically easier to filter at the national ISP's gateway. TBH, the only plausible explanations are either:

- They felt like swinging their cock around by bullying websites for some reason.

- They are legitimately too retarded to do it themselves.

Really not sure what they're hoping to accomplish by doing it this way. What are they gonna do, send threatening emails to every website they don't like? Even assuming that isn't a fundamentally retarded approach at a conceptual level, it's inherently a reactive. Therefore it's a losing approach that's always responding to the next naughty website and will never meet their intent.
 
Who are the gang of cunts doing this?

Behold - MAINLY WAMEN:

>A bunch of old farts in parliament protecting pedophiles and using this law to censor any bad talk about the government that might hurt their feefees
>Many males, which they have found themselves in sexual assault scandals related to children, either by themselves or association
>"it's those gosh darn wahmen"


Every fucking time.
 
Back