2025-07-25 - OFCOM: "Ofcom engagement - Availability of KiwiFarms in UK"

That's a new one for me. If they really tell the women who get raped "well actually, you look like a whore so you probably deserve it" I can't even be mad. This is some peak levels of disgust at your own people, if they still whine like whipped dogs and beg for mercy after that, what can you really even say?
>Telling 14 year old British girls grabbed off the street that they look like whores and thus deserve it

I mean, that *is* the logic that the pakismashers use..."the girls aren't dressed like dumpster-ninjas, so they're whores."
I'm not sure that I can voice my feelings towards that sentiment. It involves arboreal equipment, industrial-strength foot tickling, and very stern lectures, though.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Broken Cuddles
A nationalized gun range... huh... well I take it your county isn't turning blue anytime soon.
County-run is the absolute opposite of nationalized. The closer the government is to the people, the better, because the government has to walk among the people every day. When you vote for someone in a rural county, you're probably voting for someone you know personally, or at least someone in your family knows someone in their family.

And most decisions that actually effect your life are from local government. Retards obsess about what the President is up to or whatever, when most of what that dickhead does has zero or near-zero direct effect on them. Meanwhile, the local government is actually deciding what you can do with your land.

ETA: and to make it clear, it may seem to be paradoxical that people simultaneously may actually know at least some of their local government personally and be completely unaware of what they're actually doing.
fIYsASevuYiJPvmSfdAySsP1NF4YlyqY.webp
 
If memory serves null wrote a strongly worded letter , through an attorney, had a letter drafted stating his position that OFCOM could eat shit. See here
That letter is a thing of beauty; this paragraph the most beautiful of all:

1743447303010.webp


It's going to take a lot for Null's and/or his legal counsel to top the first letter to Ofcom, but I believe in them.
 
the missouri department of conservation runs multiple open, public gun ranges with no fees, no range officer, and provided targets and concrete shooting benches. they put them in national parks and managed land.
Yeah, I went to one years ago. An absolute retard walked out in front of the line during live fire to retrieve a target. Did not go back.

As much as rangemasters can be assholes, they weren't invented for no reason.

ETA: I should say that I also went to one of their fully staffed facilities on another occasion, which was much nicer and dirt cheap compared to private ranges, if a bit restrictive. They even offered quite a few free classes on guns and general outdoorsing.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Jhonson the Two
Nobody in the world can own a firearms as easily as you can in America, even in California. There is no comparison, just because we can't walk around with full auto machineguns out in broad daylight anymore(which is bullshit btw) doesn't change anything.

Also, for UK in particular, the "gun" laws are so cucked that it just makes you laugh. Americans can use guns for anything from target shooting to self defense without question if they are allowed to have gun rights at all(ie not a felon or some unstable retard), in UK you're lucky if you can beg for permission to get some shitty double barrel for clay pigeon shooting or hunting.
There's gun laws, and there's use of force laws (i.e. self defense). Certainly related (a gun is probably the best overall defensive tool to preserve your life or the lives of your loved ones) but not necessarily the same.

The UK is cucked in both. Not only are guns haram, if a home invader violently breaks down your door, have fun legally defending yourself.

Even the most cucked states have robust self defense laws, especially when you're attacked in your home. It's ironic that Castle Doctrine originated from English law.
 
To think this is what has become of the country that gave us the Magna Carta. This usurpation of the rights of Englishmen is most disturbing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pee Cola
To think this is what has become of the country that gave us the Magna Carta. This usurpation of the rights of Englishmen is most disturbing.
The point of the Magna Carta wasn't to limit the king's power to make Britain less totalitarian, it was to weaken the monarchy so that the feudal lords had more power to do what they wanted.
 
Last edited:
Way off topic but a gentle reminder that if you remove gun suicides and gang on gang violence, the actual rate of gun crime in America is quite low. It goes from something like 14 per 100k to 5 per 100k. Like 50% of gun deaths are suicides alone.
But you can't remove them, can you? If gangs didn't have guns because anyone can buy one, there wouldn't be gang shootings. And please don't pretend the rates of mass murder in the States are low. There's a mass murder using guns nearly every day. And not a single one of them has been prevented by "the right" to bear arms.

The States is a travesty of a country, Full of fat people, stupids, guns. Pillaging its way around the world, killing millions of people. And the Donald as a president. Laughable.
 
But you can't remove them, can you? If gangs didn't have guns because anyone can buy one, there wouldn't be gang shootings. And please don't pretend the rates of mass murder in the States are low. There's a mass murder using guns nearly every day. And not a single one of them has been prevented by "the right" to bear arms.

The States is a travesty of a country, Full of fat people, stupids, guns. Pillaging its way around the world, killing millions of people. And the Donald as a president. Laughable.
You madam, in addition to being factually wrong, are ignorant, fat, ugly and retarded. Even worse, you are shitting up the thread with tranny levels of faggotry.
funny.gif
 
But you can't remove them, can you? If gangs didn't have guns because anyone can buy one, there wouldn't be gang shootings. And please don't pretend the rates of mass murder in the States are low. There's a mass murder using guns nearly every day. And not a single one of them has been prevented by "the right" to bear arms.

The States is a travesty of a country, Full of fat people, stupids, guns. Pillaging its way around the world, killing millions of people. And the Donald as a president. Laughable.
Against my better judgement I'm going to reply again because you're all over the place.

First, lets do a little thought experiment. It is pretty common for people here to make fun of the UK for the fact that their Pakistani, Algerian, and other mudslime imports have been raping their children and getting away with it. What if instead when they were raping they were just mostly raping other adult Pakistani males? Would it be worth re-evaluating their rapes per-capita controlling for this weird anomaly?

Second, I'm not even talking about mass murders/shootings. If you want to go that route its even worse because most mass murders (usually defined as 3 or more murders in a single instance) are even more skewed towards gang on gang violence. We start getting into terrorism as well, which now we are going to start having to compare Trucks of Peace™️and Stabbings of Peace™️.

Third, mass shootings are regularly stopped by normal citizens exercising their right to bear arms, both during a mass shooting event but also before the mass shooter has a chance to kill anyone. Two recent ones that stick in my brain were a church in Michigan where a parishioner on their volunteer security team killed the potential shooter before he could even shoot anyone, and one in Indiana where another private citizen (in a pretty remarkable feat of marksmanship) one-tapped a potential mass shooter inside of a mall.

Fourth, the obesity rate of the USA has actually started to go back down and we are no longer the fattest nation in the world (ignoring irrelevant places like those fat Pacific islanders). Pretty sure the UK overtook us recently too.
 
But you can't remove them, can you? If gangs didn't have guns because anyone can buy one, there wouldn't be gang shootings. And please don't pretend the rates of mass murder in the States are low. There's a mass murder using guns nearly every day. And not a single one of them has been prevented by "the right" to bear arms.

The States is a travesty of a country, Full of fat people, stupids, guns. Pillaging its way around the world, killing millions of people. And the Donald as a president. Laughable.
An other simple thing to acknowledge is a gun ban works only on honest people. Gangs and other criminals don't give a shit about laws and will just buy their weapons on black markets. Now you have a population without guns against criminals with guns. Very nice.
It's what is happening in France right now. It's so bad normal people are beginning to illegally possess guns too because the government isn't doing anything. I'm sure similar things is happening in other UE coutries as well
USA has a mass shooting problem because they're shit to deal with their mentally ill
 
Back