2025 Israel vs Iran War

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Catch The Rainbow said:
Regime TV had a live feed of their ballistic missiles fired towards Israel. Only one problem: They were all intercepted, and the channel had to cut the live feed immediately out of embarrassment.

View attachment 7509193
Click to expand...
That was like maybe a dozen missiles tops? The fuck Iran? Where's the kino?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shiggler, XYZpdq Jr. and Falcos_Commisar
Catch The Rainbow said:
Regime TV had a live feed of their ballistic missiles fired towards Israel. Only one problem: They were all intercepted, and the channel had to cut the live feed immediately out of embarrassment.
Click to expand...
We've seen when russians claim to intercept all drones and then see their refineries on fire.
draggs said:
That's the newest one I think, munitions storage 10 miles west of Fordow going up
Click to expand...
What a pathetic storage
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Surfin Terf
From an Israeli military correspondent:
Iran has not yet launched its one-ton, one-and-a-half-ton missile, nor its cruise missiles. Only the US has penetration bombs, and without them it is not possible to destroy the nuclear facilities.

On the power limitations, the prices that are expectedAnd the following steps:
1. Last night, after discussion, it was allowed to publish - Israel does not have the ability to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities

2. The political echelon knew this and set out with a reasonable concept, but one that the public must be aware of: a "complex" that includes attacking nuclear facilities, dismantling Iranian anti-aircraft defenses in a way that allows Israeli fighter jets to circle over Tehran as if they were over Jabalia, reducing the ballistic missile threat, eliminating the Iranian security elite, and a credible threat to behead the heads of government and the ayatollahs, along with possible damage to national infrastructure such as oil reserves - may be enough.

3. Why is it enough? Bring Iran back to negotiations from a position of weakness that will force it to sign an agreement without expiration dates and with teeth - and if not, then at least postpone the nuclear project for a few years.

4. Destroying the Iranian nuclear program is indeed possible militarily, under two conditions: American joining the attack with the giant penetration bombs that only the US has and can use, which of course depends on Trump's decision - or a long "peeling" operation by Air Force aircraft protecting the nuclear facilities.

5. The second option could lead to a scenario that the IDF's top brass began discussing and preparing for yesterday: a long war of attrition with Iran, lasting months, perhaps longer; a trickle of missiles and drones, an intermittent siege of Ben-Gurion Airport, a disruption (between disruption and paralysis) of the economy and the education system, and more.

6. Therefore, alongside the euphoria from the powerful opening blow and the justification for the move in which senior IDF officials are partners - a closing mechanism, a political act, must be demanded, or at least a striving for it must be demanded. Iran has always excelled in multi-generational patience - putting down the flames and years of attrition with the spread of time are a victory for it.

7. Iran has many hundreds more missiles of the type that created destruction sites here in recent days, from 200-500 kg unguided rockets, but according to various sources, including experts in the field, Iran has not yet used the Khomshahar, which carries between one and two tons of explosives per rocket and has 20% more recoil effect than the missiles launched so far; Iran's cruise missiles, which are difficult to detect in good time, have also not been launched.

8. This multi-stage process, however successful, also has limitations of power, even for the large and powerful Air Force, the IDF, and the Mossad. In the end, this number of aircraft is an existing figure compared to 5,000-10,000 relevant targets deployed throughout Iran.

And the prices will be many times heavier than a war with Hamas. Therefore, the political conclusion is a necessity that we have no choice but to demand and expect, before the next casualties, and in the foreseeable future.
Click to expand...

Israeli strategy kinda depends on the US coming in with bunker busting bombs to really destroy any and all nuclear capabilities of Iran. So maybe they're hoping to drag this out until Trump joins in, but he's pretty adamant about wanting to stay out of it.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Broken Cuddles, Adachi The Lurker, Sammich and 11 others
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Wooo, IAmNotAlpharius, HOMO FOR LIFE RETURNS and 4 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back