4CHAN COMMUNITY SUPPORT LLC and LOLCOW, LLC, d/b/a KIWI FARMS, Plaintiffs, v. THE UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS, a/k/a OFCOM

4CHAN COMMUNITY SUPPORT LLC v. UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS 1:25-cv-02880 — District Court, District of Columbia

  • Docket No.
    1:25-cv-02880
  • Court
    District Court, District of Columbia
  • Filed
    Aug 26, 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    440 Civil Rights: Other
  • Cause
    28:2201 Declaratory Judgment
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Jan 15, 2026

Parties (3)

Parties
LOLCOW, LLC, UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS, 4CHAN COMMUNITY SUPPORT LLC

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
13 Jan 15, 2026 REPLY to opposition to motion re 8 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction, filed by UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS. (Kry, Robert) (Entered: 01/16/2026) PDF
Jan 1, 2026 Set/Reset Deadlines
Jan 1, 2026 Set/Reset Deadlines: Replies due by 1/19/2026. (tj)
Dec 31, 2025 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply
Dec 31, 2025 MINUTE ORDER granting 12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply: It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant shall file its Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on or before January 19, 2026. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 1/1/2026. (lcrc2)

WelperHelper99

Unlimited Sneed Works
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Dec 12, 2022
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 4CHAN COMMUNITY SUPPORT LLC and LOLCOW, LLC, d/b/a KIWI FARMS, Plaintiffs, v. THE UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS, a/k/a OFCOM

A long, long time ago, there was a war. A war of independence. The nations of Great Britain and the Thirteen Colonies fought, as one vied for freedom from the other. The Thirteen Colonies won. In 1783 the Treaty of Paris was signed, granting the Thirteen Colonies, now the United States, freedom from the yoke of Great Britain.

Now lets fast forward just a few centuries. It is the 21st millennium, Britain is now a dump. The Online Safety Act 2023 has passed in the UK, also known as Bongistan. This law seeks to regulate speech across the globe, outside the borders of the British Isles.

Before we get started, lets explain who 4chan, Kiwi Farms, and OFCOM are.


Parties:

4chan:

4chan-logo-500x281.webp
4chan is a popular imageboard founded by Christopher Poole/Moot in 2003. Its content is rather infamous among internet denizens, but has managed to stand the test of time. Currently owned and operated by Hiroyuki Nishimura/Gookmoot.

Kiwi Farms/ Lolcow LLC:
kiwi.webp
Kiwi Farms was started as CWCki Forums under its original owners, before transferal to the current owner and operator, Joshua Conner Moon/Null. Started roughly around 2012. It is a message board dedicated to documenting "Lolcows", among other topics, such as news, cooking, arts, survival tactics, and more.

OFCOM:
ofcom-logo.webp
The Office of Communications or OFCOM is a Governemt approved (but not owned) regulatory agency responsable for regulating, television, telecoms, internet, radio, broadband, phones, video platforms, the wireless spectrum, and postal services.

The Facts:

In March and April respectively, Kiwi Farms and 4chan were contacted by the regulatory body of the UK known as OFCOM.

4chan did not respond. OFCOM stated they would be opening an investigation as of June 9th 2025, a “final legal notice” on June 16, 2025, a “preliminary contravention email” on July 9, 2025, and a “provisional decision notice” on August 12, 2025. They were threatened with criminal penalties, along with a penalty of £18 million or 10% of 4chan’s worldwide revenue, whichever is greater, and advised 4chan that failing to comply with the 4chan Information Notice was a criminal offense. This was not validly served under the US-UK Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty. More threats followed, including a threat to impose a fine of £20,000 (twenty thousand pounds Sterling) on 4chan Community Support LLC, as well as daily fines of £100 (one hundred pounds Sterling) daily for noncompliance for up to a maximum of sixty days. Again, this was not validly served under the US-UK Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty.

Kiwi Farms did respond. In essence, what happened was Kiwi Farms got an Advisory Letter (link). The UK was then blocked as a precautonary measure. OFCOM was satisfied (link). But on July 16th, 2025, the site was down for maintence. The UK block was disabled. OFCOM then came back like the Randalls they are and demanded that Kiwi Farms comply with the OSA (the “Second Kiwi Farms Demand”) (link).

Joshua Conner Moon/Null, Owner and Operator of Kiwi Farms, was not having it. The block was left disabled. And for those wondering, the Second Kiwi Farms Demand was not validly served under the US-UK Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty.

And here we are today in August 2025. Enter Lolcow LLC, to be refered to as Kiwi Farms, and 4chan. Having been approached by outside legal help from Preston J. Byrne (twitter) and Ronald D. Coleman (twitter), these two estranged websites have joined forces against the censorious threat.
1756321611937.webp
Capture.webp

Their opposition is OFCOM (website link) , a quazi-governmental organization of Britain, which regulates media and online traffic. Also the infamous TV licenses that nobody pays.
fdfv32.webp
The Judge in the case is Judge Rudolph Contreras (link).
contreras.webp
Summons has been issued to OFCOM as of writing.
Screenshot 2025-08-28 173419.webp
2-1.webp

Link to main A&N thread here:

Courtlistener page is here:

Case 1:25-cv-02880

Godsneed.
airplane.webp
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Include links to the relevant threads in "take that off the internet". Don't just say the Kiwifarms sent a response back. Hyperlink the reader to the response itself. Assume someone is coming into the case cold.

Also for SEO purposes its a very good idea to put the full case number somewhere in the OP.

You should also do an introduction of the lawyers involved in this case. For example Byrne is also a licensed solicitor in the UK and lived there for 15 years before moving back to America because he saw which way the wind was blowing.

Good podcast to watch here.

 
Great. Now put something to separate the end of "parties" section and the next section. Something like "The Facts" or whatever. Also do both of those:
Include links to the relevant threads in "take that off the internet". Don't just say the Kiwifarms sent a response back. Hyperlink the reader to the response itself. Assume someone is coming into the case cold.

Also for SEO purposes its a very good idea to put the full case number somewhere in the OP.

Put the case number at the end.

And I think after that it is ready for a move to LLP
 
Great. Now put something to separate the end of "parties" section and the next section. Something like "The Facts" or whatever. Also do both of those:


Put the case number at the end.

And I think after that it is ready for a move to LLP
All has been done as asked.
 
I don't know if it's a bit premature but I did look into how Ofcom was structured a while ago. Two people who are very likely to come up on their side are Martin Ballantyne (General Counsel and Legal Group Director) (Archive) and Oliver Griffiths (Group Director, Online Safety) (Archive). You can find Ofcom's board agendas and notes here (scroll down). The last pair of agenda/notes were published 31 July. There's a delay, so we might get some funny in 2 months or so wherein Martin has to explain why Ofcom is being sued to the board.
 
I suspect what will happen is Ofcom will refuse to even give this the time of day and, after a default judgement against them, will simply block the sites domestically by making providers block access on their end. It is possible, however, that they try to fight this, in order to create a precedent to compel American payment processors to block sites because these bureaucrats live in a fantasy land where they are always right.
 
I don't know if it's a bit premature but I did look into how Ofcom was structured a while ago. Two people who are very likely to come up on their side are Martin Ballantyne (General Counsel and Legal Group Director) (Archive) and Oliver Griffiths (Group Director, Online Safety) (Archive). You can find Ofcom's board agendas and notes here (scroll down). The last pair of agenda/notes were published 31 July. There's a delay, so we might get some funny in 2 months or so wherein Martin has to explain why Ofcom is being sued to the board.
I seriously doubt they will use their in house attorney for this one if they intend to fight it out. Bringing in a foreign lawyer with no background in US Law and civil procedure at any level including law school is a good way to get shanked in a back alley and have your wallet stolen. The District Court may not even permit him to do it for that very reason.

They are going to have to hire local counsel. Assuming of course they don't try the "You can't sue us, we are sovereign" argument. Which would be the most effective way of trying to sidestep the matter entirely. But even if they can avoid being held liable by sovereign immunity, the District Court may still want to address the substantive issues at hand anyway.

I suspect what will happen is Ofcom will refuse to even give this the time of day and, after a default judgement against them, will simply block the sites domestically by making providers block access on their end. It is possible, however, that they try to fight this, in order to create a precedent to compel American payment processors to block sites because these bureaucrats live in a fantasy land where they are always right.
A Default Judgement could be bad for them. At best, 4chan and Kiwi Farms get a permanent shield of protection from the US Courts of any civil liability arising out of the UK. At worst, we get that, AND the Court decides it needs to address the substantive rights questions posed too it without the benefit of the opposing party arguing for their side.
 
I don't know if it's a bit premature but I did look into how Ofcom was structured a while ago. Two people who are very likely to come up on their side are Martin Ballantyne (General Counsel and Legal Group Director) (Archive) and Oliver Griffiths (Group Director, Online Safety) (Archive). You can find Ofcom's board agendas and notes here (scroll down). The last pair of agenda/notes were published 31 July. There's a delay, so we might get some funny in 2 months or so wherein Martin has to explain why Ofcom is being sued to the board.
It’s my understanding that Ofcom moves at a snail’s pace. What do you think are the odds that Ofcom doesn’t even bother to respond in time and a default judgement is given?
 
Back
Top Bottom