Plagued 4chan - the Internet hate machine

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Will the 4chan hack be the end of it?

  • Yes, goodbye forever 4chan

    Votes: 1,031 18.5%
  • No, they will rise from the ashes, stronger than ever

    Votes: 343 6.2%
  • This will rattle them but it will be forgotten about next week

    Votes: 2,322 41.6%
  • I am just here for the janny phonebooking

    Votes: 1,093 19.6%
  • What the fuck is 4chan

    Votes: 218 3.9%
  • Yotsuba&!

    Votes: 569 10.2%

  • Total voters
    5,576
If true, getting hacked to death by a literal script kiddie would pretty much be the most fitting of all ways for this to happen.
The actual hack, as described, is subtle enough I seriously don't think it was a skid. It's not like you can just run metasploit and do shit like that. So 13 year old or not, it was some pretty clever work.
 
Okay, I edited the summary and featured it. If it's missing anything let me know.

 
There was a setuid binary called /usr/local/bin/suid_run_global which simply execves a perl script. Said perl script was writable by www so it could be hijacked to acquire a shell.
"acquire a shell" doesn't really make any sense and shouldn't be really necessary though? www/www-data typically doesn't have any restrictions on what can be ran... you can still invoke bash or whatever shell without a proper home directory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Not A Cat Person
"acquire a shell" doesn't really make any sense and shouldn't be really necessary though? www/www-data typically doesn't have any restrictions on what can be ran... you can still invoke bash without a proper home directory.
the setuid root script was just the means by which the attacker obtained privilege escalation from www to root, there were countless ways he could have done it but that's just the way he did it

root is full system access to everything while www is some degree of lesser access, regardless of how the system is configured
 
Wait remind me one more time, who the fuck is moot?????
Just some faggot named !Εр8рui8Vw2
the setuid root script was just the means by which the attacker obtained privilege escalation from www to root, there were countless ways he could have done it but that's just the way he did it
It's kind of colloquial use but when talking about a hack when people sloppily say "shell access" they generally mean root shell access. Lots of shells are extremely limited, like the so-called "jailshells" a lot of devices have and where janny level types can do some limited command line things.
 
CHANS CLOSED.webp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think you could rephrase the explanation of the exploit to be a bit more concise. You should also clarify it was the PDF upload feature that was exploited, as this is an important detail. Pic related.
>a mistaken suid binary
Lol I thought this might the case.
For those interested in the technical details there, what this means is that there was an executable with a SUID permission bit set, which means that when it is ran, it runs with the privileges of the user who owns it, in this case root, the system administrator. Correction as I was wrong, seems it's instead some user called global. Probably serves a similar function.
There are a few binaries which have this by default, but if applied to the wrong binary, it can mean almost instant privilege escalation from a standard user, to admin. a more privileged user.
There are even automated tools which can check for potential privilege escalation vectors such as these, which just makes this even worse that it was possible.
 
Last edited:
the setuid root script was just the means by which the attacker obtained privilege escalation from www to root, there were countless ways he could have done it but that's just the way he did it

root is full system access to everything while www is some degree of lesser access, regardless of how the system is configured
it wasn't escalating to root though, it was escalating to user named "global" (it was mentioned in a sharty post, and the filename)
I guess that user could have been a sudoer... (if such a concept exists in BSD)
 
You could honestly say that about the entire internet. There are too many people on it and now there are way to many third worlders to create an online "community". At the same time, do we really want "community"? I kind of see the internet as a place to shoot the shit more than anything else. Something like community is something you build in the real world with friends, family and possibly co-workers. Besides, internet communities always end in some weird shit or grooming.
It's a statement that yeah, no shit this thread was dead/dying until the great happenings because nothing of note happens on the website in a macro sense.
It can still be a fun website but it's not the forefront of anything much less a cultural hotspot worth documenting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nightlordsfan95
made an account here because I need my online interaction. why are people so resentful of 4chan?
Because I've watched trannies systematically poison it over the course of two decades only to turn its withered husk into a nigger porn emporium, zog propaganda machine and pedophilic forced feminization grooming apparatus and I want them to suffer for it. I want trannies excised from every online community like the cancer that they are and dragged out into the light and exposed as porn addicted child predator crybully cyber-jews to their friends and families and the world at large, I want them to feel afraid to pull this kind of bullshit ever again. Only then can the internet begin to heal, only then can there be any hope at all of 4chan being worthwhile again. Sorry you were born too late to experience 4chan as it once was but if you like what it has become then you're an actual literal faggot.
 
Back