5/7 - Chris rejects group of Twitter orbiters

"It takes the Accuser who labels others as a Troll more than once and most harsh to identify Themselces as Cyberbullies to others."
It's kinda hard to understand Chris's autism-ese sometimes, but is he basically saying that those who call others trolls repeatly are themselves cyberbullies?
If so, add that to the list of Chris and Hypocrisy because he's literally been doing the exact same:

You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.
 
"It takes the Accuser who labels others as a Troll more than once and most harsh to identify Themselces as Cyberbullies to others."
It's kinda hard to understand Chris's autism-ese sometimes, but is he basically saying that those who call others trolls repeatly are themselves cyberbullies?
If so, add that to the list of Chris and Hypocrisy because he's literally been doing the exact same:
Leave to Chris to fuck up and overcomplicate "the pot calling the kettle black" or "people in glass houses..". These are pretty well established old adages, Chris. You don't have to make up new ones about water fowl there, Aesop.
 
If I recall correctly - CWC assured one of his followers that his sweethearts were aware that he was prostituting himself on Twitter; and they were cool with it.

Now, he's saying he was coerced into soliciting for sex.

So, who coerced him? That moron who sent him Bronycon money, or his sweethearts?
Is it really a surprise that someone trolled Chris into advertising duck sucking services? I'm sure a lot of us thought it was a troll anyway. I'm sure it's whoever the new Idea Guy is. I wouldn't be surprised if they told Chris that people were holding CWCville citizens hostage and their demands were Chris advertising gay prostitution. Something rētarded like that anyway.
Leave to Chris to fuck up and overcomplicate "the pot calling the kettle black" or "people in glass houses..". These are pretty well established old adages, Chris. You don't have to make up new ones about water fowl there, Aesop.
Well this is a man who used the phrase "A chipmunk's bounty of bananas" to mean something along the lines of nothing/a very little amount. Or "I'll drink my agua to that" to praise something.
 
s it really a surprise that someone trolled Chris into advertising duck sucking services? I'm sure a lot of us thought it was a troll anyway. I'm sure it's whoever the new Idea Guy is. I wouldn't be surprised if they told Chris that people were holding CWCville citizens hostage and their demands were Chris advertising gay prostitution. Something rētarded like that anyway.
So, why hasn't he removed the bisexual title from his twitter bio.
 
screenshot-twitter-com-2018-05-07-20-31-12-png.444316
Looks like somebody was too honest.
 
Well this is a man who used the phrase "A chipmunk's bounty of bananas" to mean something along the lines of nothing/a very little amount. Or "I'll drink my agua to that" to praise something.
Haha I rag on it because I'm an Internet jerk, but I actually love Chris adages.
 
So, why hasn't he removed the bisexual title from his twitter bio.
Could be because he's in a poly relationship with fictional characters if he's actually convinced that it's happening/happened in CWCville. Or if being "bisexual" would impress someone he's interested in.

I don't know how seriously he takes this fictional relationship with his cartoon hedgehogs since I haven't seen any leaked DMs from the new Idea Guy.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Marvin
He was in full-on fear sweat panic mode yesterday, now he's white trash Buddha?
I guess we know when his meds kick in?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TaterBot
What exactly did Tings do?
She leaked his convos a few days back to clear her naem of being Idea Guy 2.0.

Man, Chris is cranked up to 11 tonight.
Haha It's like he was sleepwalking on Twitter for the past year, then suddenly woke up in the middle of a pack of a 1,000 trolls. He's now on the look out and will probably purge his followers in the coming days, so be on the look out if his follower count drops.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not really hard for him to get his sweethearts approval when they're in his head.

But even if his sweethearts are in his head (which I'm very much inclined to believe they are); what does that say about CWC's mentality that his fictional lovers support his choice in whoring himself out to complete strangers?

Assuming its Jack gives him... a bit more credit than I think he's worth. I still genuinely think there's something actually sinister going on which has led Chris to clamming up so much about it. Which ironically, if the farms were to find out, he might actually get some solutions here to dealing with it.

And that would largely depend on CWC actually understanding that the farmers are trying to help him. But, it's already been well established that - in CWC's warped sense of reality - anyone who isn't enabling his reckless stupidity are haters/trolls out to ruin him.
 
But even if his sweethearts are in his head (which I'm very much inclined to believe they are)

That Bryan guy who did the CWC comic as good as admitted that the "Sweethearts" were him and his GF- he went along with Chris' flirting (because internet fame? idk- hard to get my head round that one tbh) and Chris took that and ran with it. But yeah; putting aside the unconscionably inexplicable subhuman degeneracy of doing anything that might put "Chris Chan", "flirting", and your name in the same sentence, it was pretty much all in Chris' head. I doubt they gave a shit either way about Chris' ladyboy manwhoring aspirations.

https://twitter.com/sheeztrouble/status/994255509132849152

https://twitter.com/BryanShickley/status/994254886828060672
 
Last edited:
  • Disagree
Reactions: Marvin
"But even if his sweethearts are in his head (which I'm very much inclined to believe they are)"

That Bryan guy who did the CWC comic as good as admitted that the "Sweethearts" were him and his GF- he flirted with Chris (because internet fame? idk- hard to get my head round that one tbh) and Chris took that and ran with it. But yeah; putting aside the unconscionably inexplicable subhuman degeneracy of flirting with Chris, it was pretty much all in his head. I doubt they gave a shit either way about Chris' ladyboy manwhoring aspirations.

https://twitter.com/sheeztrouble/status/994255509132849152

https://twitter.com/BryanShickley/status/994254886828060672

That part where Bryan says he encouraged the flirtations because he didn't know know how to refuse it without upsetting CWC. That line really pisses me off - as it seems like he's trying to paint himself as someone who only had the best of intentions when it just makes him look like a cowardly douchebag.

Why the fuck would upsetting CWC matter? The fact is, if he didn't like CWC flirting with him, he wasn't obligated to accept it in order to protect CWC's precious fee fees. If it bothered Bryan, he should have told him to knock it off instead of enabling things. If CWC got upset by the rejection - oh fucking well!
 
"But even if his sweethearts are in his head (which I'm very much inclined to believe they are)"

That Bryan guy who did the CWC comic as good as admitted that the "Sweethearts" were him and his GF- he flirted with Chris (because internet fame? idk- hard to get my head round that one tbh) and Chris took that and ran with it.
I could be wrong, but I interpreted it differently. I figured that Chris flirted with him and Bryan didn't shut it down because he was trying to maintain a amiable relationship with Chris. It felt to me that he wasn't encouraging it but he didn't do what he should have: He should have instantly told Chris he wasn't interested. But since he didn't, Chris ran with it because he misunderstood.

If anything it just makes Bryan look stupid for refusing to shut down an autist hitting on him out of fear he'd upset them/get blocked.
 
Back