The dynamic of information distribution has changed dramatically, especially in the past 5 years. I agree, that some older Alpha teens or young zoomer in his 20s is likely not going to watch the entire documentary or even know it exists, but there are secondary information producers that are going to gladly take scenes from the work, cut, modify and incorporate it into their work of ticktock style short content. More often then not diametrically opposed to what the original authors intended to messaging was.
The nat socialist online propaganda of the 2010s, even as early as the 00s was already filled with scenes from BBC documentary and others, and couldn't have been produced without future tax payers and state propagandists that mainly do it for the cash flow and as part of their everyday job without any passion, while those that use the content and actually reach the targeted demographic do it for ideological reasons, often for free.
And the author didn't do his research and appears to be stuck in the 1980/90s, happy to have job security on somebody else costs with absolutely no risk and doesn't give a fucking crap about what he is writing. Just cranking out text in line with his political masters, waiting for getting liquidity wired to his account
View attachment 8073009
Sorry, but state propagandists are not hated enough. Shit like the BBC and other subsidized propaganda outlet need to be closed or face the free market. They have done way more harm in the last 30 years than good and are at this point just alibi jobs for diverse nepo babies, too stupid to compete on the free market.