KTA
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2025
Mens rea - the prosecution has to prove that the original intend was for his "venting channel" to become a "terrorist organization"why did your client start up a terrorist organization
The job of the prosecution would be to prove that it was him beyond a doubt - if they cant, in dubio pro reoThen why is your client's name found on the bodies of the minors who were coerced to harm themselves. [...] Those were other users pretending to be my client, not my client
nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare - the prosecuted doesn't have a duty to do the prosecutions jobHas your client given you the names of these other individuals [...] My client wishes not to answer that question
That is an opinion - and if the court would argue that way and acts on it, he walks free and gets paid by the "public" after the appellant court rips the judge of the first trial a new one for violating basic Roman law principlescxrpse was the very definition of "knew what was going on, and encouraged it" Guy is, genuinely mentally ill, that kind of nihilist that can't be fixed, he needs to be placed into a medical facility;
That is likely the only charge that might stick; and IF the judge takes an extreme risk to be ripped a new one by an appellant court and designates "NLM" a "terrorist organization" arguing that the chat group only exists as an organized effort to intimidate the public as coerce political actors for specific political goals, which until now no Dutch judge has done, and is a long shot for a nihilist "organization", he could face between 12 years and up to life long imprisonment. If the judge plays it save, he gets maximum 4 years probation.the things he encouraged and allowed;
Considering that the "journalists" had to play retards and "confront" him, the judge very likely plays it save. another sadist is going to walk free because the left had to larp as moral police.






