764 & Its Offshoots / "com" / Internet Extortion Groups - A decentralized extortion community filled with pedophiles, degenerates and larpers on Discords and Telegram chats

two3oh9 said:
This thread went down the shitter. It's starting to smell like Castle International fags in here.
Click to expand...


IMG_20250922_104929_297.webp

IMG_20250922_104127_886.webp
 
Institution of strategic dialogue outlining the connection between nihilistic violent criminals comitting violence to advance in such groups and the people in the true crime community that venerate, meme, replicate, imitate or romanticize criminal behavior, disregarding the motive behind the crimes.
 
Cancer ♥ said:
My knowledge comes from being a "speaker" and helping lads around the law library, theirs comes from memes and TV
Click to expand...
Wow damn you're so badass and experienced

ᓚᘏᗢ said:
Found this hurtcore channel
Click to expand...
This is gore, hurtcore is something else entirely. Also you should be reporting this stuff and/or archiving it for posterity.

Perfidious Menace said:

View attachment 7950350
View attachment 7950340View attachment 7950341
Click to expand...
Two questions: what forked Telegram app is that? And what are you trying to demonstrate with this post?
 
Legalize Asbestos said:
I've often heard that mental facilities are worse places to end up because:

1) there's less oversight
2) people give even less of a shit with mental cases than they do about felons
3) unlike jail where you might get five years, mental institutions can hold you forever.

I tend to believe this because while I always hear about Jews trying to spring felons out of jail early, I never, ever, ever, hear them doing the same for insane asylums.
Click to expand...
From what I've heard the less oversight part is probably still true. I was told by a colleuge of mine in the EMS/Fire sphere that nurses would regularly sleep on the job, and that the male/female portions were not properly locked and segregated, which resulted in more than one case of rape (be it male on female or female on male).

Plus I was told the medications really fuck you up and the staff can be more sadist bastards than prison staff and can get away with shit because whose going to believe an insane person? Some people believe inmates...
City Slick said:
I think there’s realistically only 2 solutions either take internet away from minors or ID for over 18 content AND under 18 content
Click to expand...
This isn't going to work. China limits online time by requiring real ID for all social media and games (1 hour I think, no socials for kids), they just grab their parents ID to enter it, or get their parents to verify for some legit reason and save the photo. Mind you this is in a society where porn is a prison sentence and outright banned, I don't think it's possible outside of enacting laws obviously repugnant to the US Constitution.
You can buy a "real ID" verification for about 200 or 29 USD (~1% of the monthly salary for a doctor) from an old fuck who gives no shits.

The only thing you can do is to try to get parents to be responsible, but that's a hard thing to ask in the age of a lack of self-responsibility, and even then people will slip through the cracks.
 
Darkholme's Dungeon said:
The only thing you can do is to try to get parents to be responsible, but that's a hard thing to ask in the age of a lack of self-responsibility, and even then people will slip through the cracks.
Click to expand...
Unpopular take: What if parents were held responsible for the child's Internet usage the same way they're being held responsible for things like buying them weapons that get used in mass shootings? These faggots are weaponizing the Internet/devices that their parents are paying for, might as well hit them up with crimes too.
 
two3oh9 said:
Unpopular take: What if parents were held responsible for the child's Internet usage the same way they're being held responsible for things like buying them weapons that get used in mass shootings? These faggots are weaponizing the Internet/devices that their parents are paying for, might as well hit them up with crimes too.
Click to expand...
Charge them with child negligence at the very least.
 
Perfidious Menace said:
Telegram for mobile (graphene0S).

Just highlighting that indeed there are "Castle International" LaRPist comfag's who carry water for Martin/Mercury hate-watching & commenting in this KF thread.
Click to expand...
If I recall, Castle International was also one of the groups slapfighting with Rebecca Spinks back in the day.
 
If that's BX, yes. They accused her of being a nazi, pedo, satanist, 764/com member, jew or married to a pedojew.

For the record, no PMC would engage in any of this behavior, they are LaRping as the long defunct quasi-scam PMC Castle International.
 
It would appear that a large majority of comfag groups don't approve of vielNLM (also known as "worn") taking over for klaask but that's just speculation. However if that's the case it's just more proof that everything klaask tuches turns to shit.

Anyways, a large number of shitskins showed up to publicly jerk each other off and blacklist him from their channels/groups today:
https://t.me/TheEndOfWornDV (a)

Of course, Worn/viel decided he had to make a channel to cope:
https://t.me/wornspost (a)

While they were all jacking each other off to AI generated gore, I took the opportunity to compile a list of all of their names, groups they rep, etc. Thanks faggots!

NameGroup They RepTelegram @UIDPrevious NamesNotes
abuse646@SIitTown8182351334Fave group: Combosses
quitz404HiddenHidden
relief@reliefxd7805034757@bloodydeathnote
@csamdistributor		Fave group: Combosses
vore Only links to channel
shmurdaNLMHiddenHidden
cetinMercyHiddenHidden
Exultsan/santana@tripjeet7646846962774
Havoc626@hahahavoc7698959194@deadremainsFave group: Outpatient Wellness Center
SKR H3LLH3LLHiddenHidden
shy/bleach1378@sinsremain7933740338@slayingwhores
@slittheory
RitualTerror CouncilHiddenHidden
loka xSour/Rev/626@policecharge7984662474
jeremy147@imonprobation8015318770@feelingpossessed
MorphMVK SBN NMK NKC@fatherlybf7872648814@volkov217
@wolf2813
bleedout101, lilith, 764HiddenHidden
RiotKaskarHiddenHidden
Stalk1414HiddenHidden
patientvolkov@restrive8310569005@pedohusband
leo/rivalNMK@bloodovgirls8214631606Fave group: BOBBYROOM
800dskaskarkaskar, ssk, sa@skiddedit5139883449@larpingson
CydistSlitbunniesHiddenHidden
explot/kiryu (lesley)s4m/incur/worry.sh@bussyoholic8052950731@zerodaybanditFave group:worry x doхbiη chat
Die/Revs1919@diehets7089085197@mrobinette78968ehnFave group: com chat
Lezo/GriefTerror Council, 764, 187, 4994, Kaskar, NLM@sadwaytolive7922331497Fave group: Combosses
SawSlitTown@EviITiger6908514289@EvilTigerPiMP
@calmtiger3
ZuuA33, MDTHiddenHidden
jinx808
Poetincur@PoetNLM8231247637
0xide N/AN/AOnly link given. Other accounts below.
@Oxidealt7639402102@Opsexx0xide
@Rapingmundanes		"Business account" lol
@Cucksigns7450775563@Fagsign
@Kodexportal
@D0xxxxxer8345326890
@ilovefuckingtinykids7603044656(deleted)
Crime6996@unknowncrime98019347340@chubbycatcrime
@transvampire		Fave group: Combosses
WemFraud, INCURHiddenHidden
vanish870/SS88HLN/SS88/870@Slitzx8123193750
zuu (again)death valleyHiddenHidden
VileVolkov@fedkids7644690168@ritualwithcandles
@awaitingletters		Fave group: Worry x doxbin chat
slash/satan764, 899, .zone, 5150, 44@slash213466824034405
stalk202HiddenHidden
Cydistexile/hlm@we9wdo7069431668
"real" veilTN, MDT@veil7647625145301@mortifiy764
Scar141HiddenHidden
RicoKNR@youcantcompare8439835498@AikosLawyerFave group: Outpatient Wellness Center
shaan/careful1919@mullvadb6198457544@aghxbdbk
@livysbf
dormMurdered@wgiheghe7794847211@larpdemon
@coolnigga234
Net/Vanish870HLN, SS88, 870@Slitzx8123193750
VacantSlitbunnies@pakistanilawyer7950862929@followedherback
@Olmesartan
Bear (ツ)Unknown@paedohunterツ7959043404@predpoacher
@ungroom		Fave group: larp
zuu (yet again)da hoodHiddenHidden
lucifer/jury999@forgivingher7490727486Fave group: comtalk
aiko/anonSkidbin, VilebinHiddenHidden
hate/synSPY@sheharmonmynationtilli7647493534357@screammaskshawty
@SheHarmOnMyNationTillI764		Fave group: Worry x doxbin chat
CautiousSR1SR1HiddenHidden
nightmaresr18991, 197, 757, ha.unt, late.lol, resort, TSC, 30@deadremains7356915163@sickgirldreamsFave group: SR1 public chat
SugeHiveHiddenHidden
kart (aka cartt)764@karttridge8282337701Says "og" but prob larp

Some urls scrapped from the channel:

EDIT: Added links to groups. Will update when more is available.
 
Last edited:
two3oh9 said:
Unpopular take: What if parents were held responsible for the child's Internet usage the same way they're being held responsible for things like buying them weapons that get used in mass shootings? These faggots are weaponizing the Internet/devices that their parents are paying for, might as well hit them up with crimes too.
Click to expand...
There are two sides of the debate and each have a point.
  • parents should be more involved in monitoring and moderating their childs internet activity
  • Service providers (Discord, communication service) should be more upfront to non tech savvy parents about risks and point them to resources to ensure safety (app blocking, internet monitoring services etc)
The middle ground would be that communication service providers be more transparent about dangers that could occur (and occured, occurs) on their platform, while parents who neglect to heed those warnings should be criminally liable. Add in mandatory or optional educational seminars talking about internet safety. (In schools, work, government buildings etc)

My generation will and if you're a parent probably is more stricter on their childs internet activity. New services in the future should be transparent about what goes on in their platform to prevent new novel ways of abusing their systems for criminal activity. Criminal activity evolves as technology evolves (see VR chat thread). Parents today, who grew up pre-internet or dial up internet era, just do not know how to recognize dangers on a platform (discord) that advertizes itself as safe and consistently applying their own TOS (they don't, there are simply too many servers)

On the flip side, there are parents that are simply not fit to be parents and do the best they can, but their best is not good enough to prevent danger. And those who are consistently neglegting their parental obligations should have legal consequences.
 
Vibe_Guy said:
On the flip side, there are parents that are simply not fit to be parents and do the best they can, but their best is not good enough to prevent danger. And those who are consistently neglegting their parental obligations should have legal consequences.
Click to expand...
Lots of people simply don’t think their child would ever be involved in com. Maybe they’ll hear of it at some point or another, but they think “not my kid!” Until it IS their kid. I don’t know if that would be considered neglectful or just naive but either way in some cases that’s how it goes. It’s like how people that went to school with school shooters usually say “oh he was just quiet” or “he seemed like a nice kid”. There is just people you would never suspect to be involved with stuff like this
 
modern vivilization said:
Lots of people simply don’t think their child would ever be involved in com. Maybe they’ll hear of it at some point or another, but they think “not my kid!” Until it IS their kid. I don’t know if that would be considered neglectful or just naive but either way in some cases that’s how it goes. It’s like how people that went to school with school shooters usually say “oh he was just quiet” or “he seemed like a nice kid”. There is just people you would never suspect to be involved with stuff like this
Click to expand...
Sad but true. In the publicized COM cases, such as the school shooting case, you might get the impression that both families are neglectful and their child grew up in chaos which pushed them to these communities, so all the others involved are predominantly the same. But if you read trough court documents of arrested criminals tied to COM, some simply revel in the power they might have over others and hide their COM involvement on purpose and with selfish intent.

Parent: "Give me your phone/PC."
"Ok." Deletes telegram "See? Just me and my cord buddies shitposting about Tarkov, lol!"

Like the scorpion and the frog story. Due to the actions of the ones suceptible to group think and manipulation, those doing the manipulating accidentally screw themselves over, and both face consequences. "Oh, I didn't think they'd actually do it!" well, they did. The "higher ups" in the groups couldn't stop themselves from encouraging someone young and impresionable into violence, it's in their nature.
 
Vibe_Guy said:
There are two sides of the debate and each have a point.
  • parents should be more involved in monitoring and moderating their childs internet activity
  • Service providers (Discord, communication service) should be more upfront to non tech savvy parents about risks and point them to resources to ensure safety (app blocking, internet monitoring services etc)
The middle ground would be that communication service providers be more transparent about dangers that could occur (and occured, occurs) on their platform, while parents who neglect to heed those warnings should be criminally liable. Add in mandatory or optional educational seminars talking about internet safety. (In schools, work, government buildings etc)

My generation will and if you're a parent probably is more stricter on their childs internet activity. New services in the future should be transparent about what goes on in their platform to prevent new novel ways of abusing their systems for criminal activity. Criminal activity evolves as technology evolves (see VR chat thread). Parents today, who grew up pre-internet or dial up internet era, just do not know how to recognize dangers on a platform (discord) that advertizes itself as safe and consistently applying their own TOS (they don't, there are simply too many servers)

On the flip side, there are parents that are simply not fit to be parents and do the best they can, but their best is not good enough to prevent danger. And those who are consistently neglegting their parental obligations should have legal consequences.
Click to expand...
At the same time, wtf are the societal factors that lead to this even being an issue in the first place? 10 years ago kids having unsupervised internet access was already a huge concern, but the worst most of them did was just make an ass of themselves on forums and social media or watch too much weird porn, not getting involved in pedo-sextortion-hacker rings. That shit used to be associated with middle aged pedos on the darknet, now it's practically normal teenage culture.
 
two3oh9 said:
Unpopular take: What if parents were held responsible for the child's Internet usage the same way they're being held responsible for things like buying them weapons that get used in mass shootings? These faggots are weaponizing the Internet/devices that their parents are paying for, might as well hit them up with crimes too.
Click to expand...
Two words, jury nullification (as in most people wont hold them accountable).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom