8values - What's your score, and do you think it's accurate?

Screenshot (70).png

I answered neutral several times.

Like, I don't like big government but I do think that oversight from some form of government is necessary (i.e. the state removing kids from junkie prostitute abuser homes) and I don't have a problem with allotting some money aside for people who can't work. On the other hand people abuse gubbamint bux handouts and I don't want my tax dollars going to people who are just lazy. On an individual level I don't care if someone is gay but the LGBTQMAPAARPH&RBLOCK shit is cancer and I have problems with the way the greater LGBT community acts as a whole. I think that the basic core values of Christianity are the best and should be spread but I also don't want to force people into being Christian.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WalMart and Meiwaku
View attachment 2439477
The one thing I dislike about 8values is that "we should do something about the climate" and "gay buttsex for everybody!" have the same impact on the societal scale.
Some questions are just outright retarded, because they're too contextual to actually reflect a political viewpoint. For instance, I'd answer this question entirely differently depending on whether I was living in Nazi Germany or the modern UK.
context.PNG

Aside from that, the equality vs free market thing is retarded in my view. I'm in favor of neither being viewed as a principle and think whether or not one is entitled to wealth should be contingent upon how one gained said wealth, and how one uses said wealth. If one gained their wealth through honest labor and uses their wealth morally, then there's nothing wrong even if they're filthy rich. If they gained their wealth immorally, or use their wealth to harm others or society as a whole, then that wealth should be taken and put to better use.
8shit.png
 
I have similar issues with some of the questions like what have been mentioned above by some. The one about if your country is great being from Canada, that's a hard one to question since, well, a lot of modern so-called 'Canadian values' certainly aren't mine.

August 12th, 2021.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
View attachment 2439287
I answered neutral several times.

Like, I don't like big government but I do think that oversight from some form of government is necessary (i.e. the state removing kids from junkie prostitute abuser homes) and I don't have a problem with allotting some money aside for people who can't work. On the other hand people abuse gubbamint bux handouts and I don't want my tax dollars going to people who are just lazy. On an individual level I don't care if someone is gay but the LGBTQMAPAARPH&RBLOCK shit is cancer and I have problems with the way the greater LGBT community acts as a whole. I think that the basic core values of Christianity are the best and should be spread but I also don't want to force people into being Christian.
I think the questioning was too "coarse" to produce a nuanced result. A bunch of false Dilemmas either/or that weren't really either/ors.
 
Some questions are just outright retarded, because they're too contextual to actually reflect a political viewpoint. For instance, I'd answer this question entirely differently depending on whether I was living in Nazi Germany or the modern UK.
View attachment 2439819
Aside from that, the equality vs free market thing is retarded in my view. I'm in favor of neither being viewed as a principle and think whether or not one is entitled to wealth should be contingent upon how one gained said wealth, and how one uses said wealth. If one gained their wealth through honest labor and uses their wealth morally, then there's nothing wrong even if they're filthy rich. If they gained their wealth immorally, or use their wealth to harm others or society as a whole, then that wealth should be taken and put to better use.
View attachment 2439885
You want money to be beholden to your country's culture and morals? That's awfully anti-semitic of you.

The whole concept of quizzes like these is based on a false premise of universalism, that ideology is the most important thing in determining the political structure that you should support, that political structures are tools of ideologies and not distinct peoples. For example, people of a particular group quickly changed from supporting worldwide revolution of the proletariat to being ardent adherents of the free market and bombing muslims; from marxists to quintessential neocons. Literally, the very same people went from one to the other, not because what they believed changed, but because they knew of something greater than ideology that united them. Likewise, you can be a libertarian or even a leftists and support Fascism if there is something more important to you than individualistic hedonism. It's ridiculous how far gone people are though.

So many of the prompts are up in the air if you understand this, say "Government intervention is a threat to the economy." Is the government run by my friends or my enemies? Is the sector of the economy that is affected run by people who go with or against our values? Only among a people of common spirit can the debate stray from this sordid fight between friend and enemy, where the goal then is to strive for something greater and truer, but even then it can not be forgotten that there are parasites looking to re-purpose what you've built at the detriment of your people. To rephrase, the desire for your people to be ultimately sovereign over themselves must be paramount, then it can be debated how best to survive and thrive, how best to live in the light of God, and with this common understanding there can be respect for truth, honesty, and loyalty. But shattered and without this, lies and degeneracy will always be more powerful than the truth among the common man, and currently this is by design. Man should not be expected to accept their place in the hierarchy among those who are fundamentally different, who work towards different ideals. To do so is to be naught but a slave. But among your own, working towards the same ideal, to accept inequality and hierarchy is as natural as breathing.

Despite this, I can't post a ted talk then skimp out on the purpose of the thread:
1628984813652.png
 
Last edited:
04B5EB06-9CD9-4B09-B0B6-2796F17F8FDB.png

A few of the questions were unclear or my answer would be contingent on other factors. But this sums up my general beliefs fairly well.

For example “democracy is more than a decision making process”-what does this mean?

“research should be conducted internationally”-depends on the research. As well if it is in the national interest.

These sorts of questions don’t address real world contexts in which the answers actually happen but abstract “if everything went your way” hypothetical worlds.
 
Last edited:
Slowly follow the thread from the beginning in 2017 to 2022.... people are testing more conservative but I feel this is honestly reactionary (save a few people ofc) because of how Islamic shit has been lately especially in the USA. I'm generally in the consensus MOST of us are in the centrist with either a bit of left/right lean. We just all happen to have particularly similar opinions on who is fucking insane regardless of ideology (read: redditors, twitter, neo marxist revivals, wokeist sjws, trannies, fundies, mormons, leeches on society, pedos, animal abusers ).

1644520861614.png
 
Last edited:
Sowly follow the thread from the beginning in 2017 to 2022.... people are testing more conservative but I feel this is honestly reactionary (save a few people ofc) because of how Islamic shit has been lately especially in the USA. I'm generally in the consensus MOST of us are in the centrist with either a bit of left/right lean. We just all happen to have particularly similar opinions on who is fucking insane regardless of ideology (read: redditors, twitter, neo marxist revivals, wokeist sjws, trannies, fundies, mormons, leeches on society, pedos, animal abusers ).

View attachment 2974756

Some of the questions were idiotic. Caring about the environment doesn't make you a progressive, and given how the 1-2 questions were phrased I'm almost entirely sure that's why I'm at ~80% tradition instead of 100%.

I suspect we see a lot of centrist posters here who hit 50/50 in everything because the correct answer to a lot of them is "it depends." I answered them all as if the people making the rules were the people I would want to make the rules, which is why I think 3/4ths of my lines skew one way or the other.

Would I lick neo-liberal authoritarian boots? No. Would I be thrilled with evil right wingers imprisoning Jack Dorsey and Zuck for life after seizing their monetary assets? Yes.
 
Last edited:
The absolute state of farmers who don't know how to access the secret Based ratings.

Yes I am a market distributist.

Yes I am extremely racist and pro immigrant.

Yes I don't believe most people shouldn't have rights except my friends.

Yes you're getting the vaccine AND you're due next Wednesday for The Superhuman Project. We're installing an extra pituitary gland in everyone to see if we can make giants.


8val.png
 
ndcksdcsdc.png

I'll throw in my results alongside the 9axes (which put me as a Right-Wing Populist) and the political compass which put me as rather centrist. As others have said you kinda have to infer the writer's intention when reading a lot of these questions alongside choosing whether to answer as an idealist or a realist.

I like reading this thread as it narrates Kiwi Farm's origins as a center-left site into a rightoid refugee camp. Very cool.
bfdvhvbjhdfbv2.png
I've been told liberals are very tolerant of refugees so I imagine we will be welcomed with open arms.
 

Attachments

  • cgsidcis.png
    cgsidcis.png
    217.2 KB · Views: 69
  • chart.png
    chart.png
    17.5 KB · Views: 65
Back