A Stupid Question

[Crankenstein]

If we're talking like another Tesla or Newton sure, but for the vast majority, no. Let the line die with them.

 

[KittyGremlin]

If it's up to personal choice, sure, let them be whatever

 

[Quadratic chips]

The illness is gayness and The cure is a bullet

 

[contradiction of terns]

There's been speculation and research done in regards to showing that hormone exposure in the womb can effect sexual orientation and whether a child is gender conforming or gender non-conforming. From this it's reasonable to speculate that if the appropriate hormone levels to insure a straight, gender conforming child could be found, then you could simply tweak the hormone levels in whatever pregnant woman you were dealing with to get the result you wanted once the fetus was carried to term.

With that said, I have to say I personally wouldn't waste time on turning every child out there straight. If it was a side effect of curing say... autism... which it has been hypothesized also results from hormone imbalances in the womb, then yeah, I'd start turning the freaking fetuses straight (but only to prevent speds).

I will also point out that you wouldn't be depriving anyone of anything using this method, since they would be straight from birth and couldn't be 'robbed' of any satisfaction they got from their gayness.

Edit: Decided to add some sauce.

 

[Merried Senior Comic]

No. Personally I have no problems with gay people.