A thread for you to mine out of context quotes

[Whitesnake]

What gets me is Null talked about TERA, and of course the lolicon scum in the comments start arguing with people and throwing around "it's totally not pedophilia and you're a pedo for saying so."

Why do they all use the same playbook?

It doesn't matter what's in the game, as long it's not actual real child porn, it shouldn't be censored.

Being okay with censoring things solely because you personally object to the content is literally why Josh has had to jump through so many hoops to keep this website up. "I don't like it, so it shouldn’t exist" is braindead logic.

Call it disgusting, call the people who like it pedos, say whatever you want about it. Censorship is still bad.

 

[Wodanaz]

It doesn't matter what's in the game, as long it's not actual real child porn, it shouldn't be censored.

Being okay with censoring things solely because you personally object to the content is literally why Josh has had to jump through so many hoops to keep this website up. "I don't like it, so it shouldn’t exist" is braindead logic.

Call it disgusting, call the people who like it pedos, say whatever you want about it. Censorship is still bad.

Why can't I call it child porn because they look like children?
Why do they make them look like children and make them wear thongs?

 

[Whitesnake]

Why can't I call it child porn because they look like children?
Why do they make them look like children and make them wear thongs?

Because that's not what child porn means.

Do you have a point to make about censorship or are you just trying to argue the semantics of lolishit like a retard?

 

[Lidl Drip]

It doesn't matter what's in the game, as long it's not actual real child porn, it shouldn't be censored.

Being okay with censoring things solely because you personally object to the content is literally why Josh has had to jump through so many hoops to keep this website up. "I don't like it, so it shouldn’t exist" is braindead logic.

Call it disgusting, call the people who like it pedos, say whatever you want about it. Censorship is still bad.

Ok, pedo.

I like her design, but that's all that exists of her: her design and a couple basic character traits. She's a loli witch who makes potions and hexes and she has an imp/demon sidekick. That's it.

Her popularity is based solely on lolicons just looking up the character and fapping to her concept art.

The character he is referring to in these posts:

 

[Whitesnake]

Ok, pedo.




The character he is referring to in these posts:
View attachment 5950003

Can you point to anything I said that was objectionable or do you think "I like her design" means "I jack off to her"?

Genuine schizo behavior.

 

[Lidl Drip]

Can you point to anything I said that was objectionable or do you think "I like her design" means "I jack off to her"?

Genuine schizo behavior.

"I like this loli character"
"the only people who like this character are pedos who jack off to her"
"also loli characters should never be censored even if they are kids in thongs"
"they aren't real children so it's fine to sexualize them"

I am sure you care only about the free speech aspect here, lmfao. You guys aren't as slick as you think. You also have several posts complaining about the censorship of cubfur art on Patreon.

 

[Wodanaz]

Because that's not what child porn means.

Do you have a point to make about censorship or are you just trying to argue the semantics of lolishit like a retard?

I just fail to see a good reason to defend something that looks exactly like child porn. If you were talking about the book lolita by vladimir nabokov which is a story about how child addiction drives a man to destruction and a girl to corruption then I would be on your side because that is a valuable work of art. But instead you insist on saying "censorship is bad" (STUNNING observation by the way) when the child porn appearing obscene material isn't accepted without question. It is a depiction of a child wearing a thong that exists to be masturbated to, from a completely different yellow bugman culture, and is therefore simply degenerate. Retarded lolbertarian cope about muh total black and white censorship is laughable.
BTW if you want to start throwing around legal definitions of what constitutes child porn then just skip straight to talking about obscenity law and how your child thong elves would totally not be considered obscene in the people's free republic of greater israelifornewyork.

 

[dustbuster]

I just fail to see a good reason to defend something that looks exactly like child porn

How much child porn do you look at each day?

 

[Whitesnake]

"the only people who like this character are pedos who jack off to her"
[…]
"they aren't real children so it's fine to sexualize them"

These statements exist solely within your mind, a manifestation of your profound mental illness. Stop shitting up the thread with your schizo nonsense.

I just fail to see a good reason to defend something that looks exactly like child porn.

Your inability to distinguish drawings from actual real humans visually or conceptually is not actually a rebuttal to what I said.

Edit:

You also have several posts complaining about the censorship of cubfur art on Patreon.

I made the same point then that I’m making now. Content's status as objectionable or immoral does not justify its censorship.

 

[Wodanaz]

Your inability to distinguish drawings from actual real humans visually or conceptually is not actually a rebuttal to what I said.

You didn't answer me when I asked why the korean bug people made underage little girl looking creatures wearing thongs.

How much child porn do you look at each day?

How much did tera's designers look at? lmfao

 

[Whitesnake]

You didn't answer me when I asked why the korean bug people made underage little girl looking creatures wearing thongs.

Who knows? Who cares? How does that relate to the original point?

 

[Wodanaz]

Who knows? Who cares? How does that relate to the original point?

Because if something exists to masturbate pedophiles then censorship is not actually, in fact, le bad.

 

[Sniperwoof]

I just fail to see a good reason to defend something that looks exactly like child porn.

Ok, here you go.

In the 1970's/1980's various Western European nations passed sweeping hate speech legislation, pretty much everyone cheered this on because we don't want Nazis in our society right?

Fast forward 40 years and now people in England and various other countries are being sentenced to ten years in prison for statements as innocuous as "men in dresses are not women.

And now very stupid individuals like yourself want to give these same people the ability to imprison people and take away their rights over fucking drawings, literal ink and paper.

Use your fucking head for five seconds and think where this is going to lead, do you seriously think this is going to be used exclusively against "pedos" or will it be used to oppress political dissidents and other innocent people like virtually every other time?

Where do you think these laws come from exactly?

 

[God of Nothing]

but what does any of this have to do with stellar blade?
even i think the censorship autism is a bit uncalled for, but you faggots have been shitting up the thread about something only vaguely related to this

 

[Whitesnake]

Because if something exists to masturbate pedophiles then censorship is not actually, in fact, le bad.

Even assuming the target audience of TERA was pedophiles (something you haven't, and can't, substantiate), you haven't presented a reason why the target audience would make a difference.

 

[Lidl Drip]

Whenever there is a censorship debate, anime pedos immediately flock to it like moths to the flame.

 

[Whitesnake]

but what does any of this have to do with stellar blade?
even i think the censorship autism is a bit uncalled for, but you faggots have been shitting up the thread about something only vaguely related to this

Ey, don't look at me, man. Apparently the very lukewarm take of "censoring things over vibes and feelings is bad" gets translated to "pedophilia is cool" somewhere in the schizophrenic mind.

 

[Wodanaz]

Ok, here you go.

In the 1970's/1980's various Western European nations passed sweeping hate speech legislation, pretty much everyone cheered this on because we don't want Nazis in our society right?

Fast forward 40 years and now people in England and various other countries are being sentenced to ten years in prison for statements as innocuous as "men in dresses are not women.

And now very stupid individuals like yourself want to give these same people the ability to imprison people and take away their rights over fucking drawings, literal ink and paper.

Use your fucking head for five seconds and think where this is going to lead, do you seriously think this is going to be used exclusively against "pedos" or will it be used to oppress political dissidents and other innocent people like virtually every other time?

National socialism is an ideology which can work or can fail (also europeans are retarded and deserve to get raped because they were jewed into believing national socialism was... LE BAD at all times and democracy must be defended because it just must, ok?).
Pedophiles are never a good thing and should be euthanized by the state. We must secure a future for normal white children.

Even assuming the target audience of TERA was pedophiles (something you haven't, and can't, substantiate

they designed children wearing thongs

you haven't presented a reason why the target audience would make a difference.

pedophiles should not have rights

 

[Whitesnake]

they designed children wearing thongs

Were they actual children wearing thongs, or were they shitty MMO anime models wearing thongs?

 

[God of Nothing]

Whenever there is a censorship debate, anime pedos immediately flock to it like moths to the flame.

from what i can tell

What gets me is Null talked about TERA, and of course the lolicon scum in the comments start arguing with people and throwing around "it's totally not pedophilia and you're a pedo for saying so."

Why do they all use the same playbook?

brought it up and then @Whitesnake made the mistake of addressing it
and now it all spiraled into a debate completely unrelated to what started the major activity in this thread, which was the censorship about a grown woman/cyborg/thotbot's body

Ey, don't look at me, man. Apparently the very lukewarm take of "censoring things over vibes and feelings is bad" gets translated to "pedophilia is cool" somewhere in the schizophrenic mind.

Even though I think lolicon is pedophilia, I can see where you're coming from. None of us are going to change your mind. But if you jerk off to it, you're a pedo as far as anyone with sense is concerned.