Culture A(us)BC forced to delete children's Facebook page after rap about white privilege and teleporting - *teleports behind you*

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...childrens-video-privilege-SLAMMED-online.html


The ABC has been forced to remove the Facebook page for its children's 'ME' channel after a barrage of angry viewers took offence at a video explaining 'white male privilege'.

In the video, two young female presenters try to explain the concept of privilege to the channel's primary-school aged audience through rap and cartoons of two people trying to cross a stream.

Initially published to the channel's social media about five months ago, the clip was recently shared across a number of right-wing Facebook groups - with many outraged at the video's content and the fact it was aimed at such young children.

In the video, viewers are introduced to Ross, a straight male in his mid-40s who is 'rather wealthy', in good health and born in a peaceful country. Ross is able to teleport across the stream.

They then meet Stevie, a female refugee who doesn't speak much English and has little money. Rather than being travelling across the stream by teleportation, Stevie the refugee has to swim across the stream, despite developing a cough just before she jumps in.

The video ends by explaining Ross was able to cross the stream due to his privilege.

'He was born with advantage, unearned gifts that his life was granted,' one host raps.

'He might not think about his in-built perks, but that's just the way that privilege works.'

The ABC declined to respond to questions as to whether the material was appropriate for its audience.
 
Why is someone that can barely speak English named "Stevie"? Is Fleetwood Mac that big in whatever 3rd world pit they're suggesting the character comes from?

Anyway- this is cringe. Pushing any of this Liberal Arts degree stuff on children is cringey. You can waste the taxpayer's money to learn this shit when you're an adult.
 
This video was uploaded right next to the one in the OP.

That nose ringed bitch is fucking unpleasant to look at.

Also, the twink in that says "We like being gay, lesbian, transgender, intersex".
Intersex isn't a choice you silly faggot, it's a medical condition. Though, tbh, nose ring and this twink seem to visually suggest that they have "medical conditions" they can't help either.
 
There was actually a 'informative comedy' show on the ABC last year, about 'enlightened modern' women trying out old fashioned dating tips, compared to modern dating.

...The series ended with one of the women pissing on her boyfriend, and then a 10 minute song being sung about how they're not sluts.

imo, if you have to sing a song about how you're not a slut, that makes you pretty goddamn fucking slutty.

EDIT:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...video-kids-program-slam-critics-new-clip.html

4AA749A500000578-5556533-The_ABC_has_responded_to_outrage_about_its_white_privilege_video-a-14_1522285741105.jpg


ABC presenters perform skit about 'Kevin'. And miss the goddamn point entirely.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure I see the real possible harm here.

For those who haven't taken dev psych yet, children are functionally sociopaths until they hit a certain age; their brains haven't developed to the point where concepts like empathy are something they can grasp. They psyches work on simple reward/punishment systems, and ideas of fairness or equality are only understood conceptually (at best).
If it isn't something that offers direct, concrete benefit to them in the extreme short term, it's beyond their grasp to truly understand it. At best, you can get them to repeat it because they think they'll get something for doing so, but they lack the theory of mind to truly feel for someone else.

So it's not that they don't give a fuck. "Martha can't cross the river but Bill can because he has unfair advantages" isn't something they're wired to be capable of giving a fuck about yet. You're trying to argue about Proust with an illiterate.

As such, while this is a colossal waste of time and money, I can't really see it as harmful, even if you view the ideology as harmful. You could try to teach a dog extremely corrupt ideas about finance, but he's unlikely to start pulling Ponzi schemes.

Let the ugly hipster bitches try to teach sociology to two year olds. Keeps them off your tax dollars, at least.
 
As such, while this is a colossal waste of time and money, I can't really see it as harmful, even if you view the ideology as harmful. You could try to teach a dog extremely corrupt ideas about finance, but he's unlikely to start pulling Ponzi schemes.

That's the thing, most people are simply stupid and refuse to think. You put this on the TV, you have children absorbing this for hours a day, day 1 from leaving the womb basically, absorbing this for years passively.

They don't understand it, they don't personally have deeply-held convictions, at the beginning they barely even understand language, but they know what they're supposed to say and they have a positive feedback loop that encourages it (Why do you think there's so many "allies" and "showing of solidarity" now?). Now, when that person hits 18, in most countries he's going to start voting, he'll hear one candidate say what this kind of propaganda said, and combined with past pleasant experiences tied to this message, that person is now more likely to vote for the candidate whose views were implanted into him from the time his brain began forming outside the womb.

Go talk to some voters, you'll understand.
 
They don't see the tragic irony of raising children to believe that skin color is the most important thing about a person.

The thing is I think this is the sort of thing that's going to Backfire spectacularly, in the next 10 / 20 years - Picture if you have kids who in there formative years are told they have all this Privilege (that they don't) and are exposed to this sort of message who then enter the real world for the first time and they find that no they kinda really don't get an automatic pass for Social Fau Pax or the better job access to services etc.

They are going to be pissed off in a way that they can't quite define and blame the people who are getting ahead for there problems but they will single out those that are the obvious outsiders i.e. anyone that stands out from the normal baseline of that local culture so maybe non-white in a white majority area, white in a non-white majority area, a Muslim in a Christian or atheist area etc, and that is going to be a breeding ground for resentment and scapegoatism that leads to a lot more race an culture based problems.

The best way to make Racism go away is if you make the race of a person a non-issue, to begin with. Don't highlight people for being best X based on the colour of there skin or background just say they are the best X in the current competition, don't promote or hire people because you feel the need for a diverse workforce hire the best people for that job spec.

When you make something an issue it becomes an issue, when you don't make a fuss over it the problems just don't happen.

This is aside from the whole culture debate but the race one is something that gets more airtime, and is worthy of it's own thread in Deep Thoughts.
 
The thing is I think this is the sort of thing that's going to Backfire spectacularly, in the next 10 / 20 years - Picture if you have kids who in there formative years are told they have all this Privilege (that they don't) and are exposed to this sort of message who then enter the real world for the first time and they find that no they kinda really don't get an automatic pass for Social Fau Pax or the better job access to services etc.

They are going to be pissed off in a way that they can't quite define and blame the people who are getting ahead for there problems but they will single out those that are the obvious outsiders i.e. anyone that stands out from the normal baseline of that local culture so maybe non-white in a white majority area, white in a non-white majority area, a Muslim in a Christian or atheist area etc, and that is going to be a breeding ground for resentment and scapegoatism that leads to a lot more race an culture based problems.

The best way to make Racism go away is if you make the race of a person a non-issue, to begin with. Don't highlight people for being best X based on the colour of there skin or background just say they are the best X in the current competition, don't promote or hire people because you feel the need for a diverse workforce hire the best people for that job spec.

When you make something an issue it becomes an issue, when you don't make a fuss over it the problems just don't happen.

This is aside from the whole culture debate but the race one is something that gets more airtime, and is worthy of it's own thread in Deep Thoughts.

Oi mate do you have a license for that common sense?
 
There’s an easier way of explaining privilege without resorting to magic. Privileged rich whitey builds bridge to cross river, makes it a toll bridge to charge poor refugees, but gives a cheaper price to other rich whiteys.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Lawgiver
I'm running out of places for cancer contracted on the internet to grow.
 
They are going to be pissed off in a way that they can't quite define and blame the people who are getting ahead for there problems but they will single out those that are the obvious outsiders
Even more than that, every white kid who grows up in a shitty situation or has handicaps and hardships will resent minorities because they've been told their whole lives that "marginalized people" deserve a leg up - but it's obviously a lie in their experience, because you apparently only get that leg up if you're not the wrong skin color. They'll just give up on allying with a system that so obviously insists on lying to them about its true intentions because it clearly doesn't respect them enough to be honest with them.

Hell, that's happening now. That's one of the biggest causes of the anti-pc backlash.
 
So is this a lost skit from MDE World Peace: Season 2?
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Munchingonfish
Back