Disaster Active Shooter at Youtube HQ

Status
Not open for further replies.
Confirmed reports of an Active Shooter at YT HQ in San Bruno (outside of San Francisco California).

SUMMARY:
Shots first reported on Twitter around 12:57PM PST via Vadim Lavrusk @Lavrusik who is now confirmed he has been evacuated.
Large police presence in the area.
Reports of a FEMALE shooter.
4-5 Victims transported to hospital at 3:30 PM PST

upload_2018-4-3_16-13-43.png


upload_2018-4-3_16-15-6.png


upload_2018-4-3_16-26-1.png


San Bruno police now reporting to clear the area.
upload_2018-4-3_16-20-30.png


upload_2018-4-3_16-42-38.png


Source:
http://www.ktvu.com/news/active-shooter-situation-at-youtube-headquarters
https://gizmodo.com/possible-active-shooter-reported-at-youtubes-san-bruno-1824294859
 
Last edited:
With that many injured civilians she would have to be the worst shooter ever. Like "Blind, athritic, grandma while having a seizure"-bad.

Three seems well within the realm of possibility if she's not used to handling weapons, and especially if she tried to shoot her actual target from a distance initially.

I hope we do learn more, but I wouldn't count on it.
 
It's like when a Crip sees a person in a red McDonald's uniform, therefore it's a Blood.

So that's why they need bulletproof glass in the fast food joints in Detroit!

In all seriousness though, I'm glad nobody was hurt, it means I get to laugh my ass off watching Eichenwald make an ass out of himself again without a serious tragedy this time. (Not that the shooting itself wasn't awful)
 
Three seems well within the realm of possibility if she's not used to handling weapons, and especially if she tried to shoot her actual target from a distance initially.

I hope we do learn more, but I wouldn't count on it.

That will be the likely outcome. It will be memory holed because it doesn't fit a narrative. If it did, they'd be screaming the name from the rooftops and plastering the picture everywhere. It's disturbingly obvious.
 
Holy shit, this lady actually thinks proponents of 2A should die. Jesus Christ lady, it's a political argument, not a fucking gang war. Crazy bint.

Why do people always have to be on one extreme or the other? It's possible to support 2A and encourage more gun regulations!
Because they have a very black and white worldview.
To them it isn't responsible gun owners vs. people who think we need some more gun regulations, it's evil racist violent stupid redneck Neo Nazi future school shooters vs. smart educated good people who know best.
(The same can be said about a lot of right wing pro 2A people too, so it's not exclusively a left wing problem)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back