Crime Actor Danny Masterson found guilty of 2 out of 3 counts of rape in retrial

Link / Archive

LOS ANGELES (AP) — A jury found “That ’70s Show” star Danny Masterson guilty of two out of three counts of rape Wednesday in a Los Angeles retrial in which the Church of Scientology played a central role.

The jury of seven women and five men reached the verdict after deliberating for seven days spread over two weeks. They could not reach a verdict on the third count, that alleged Masterson raped a longtime girlfriend. They had voted 8-4 in favor of conviction.

Masterson was led from the courtroom in handcuffs. The 47-year-old actor faces up to 30 years in prison.

His wife, actor and model Bijou Phillips, wept as he was led away. Other family and friends sat stone-faced.

“I am experiencing a complex array of emotions – relief, exhaustion, strength, sadness – knowing that my abuser, Danny Masterson, will face accountability for his criminal behavior,” one of the women, whom Masterson was convicted of raping at his home in 2003, said in a statement.





The woman, whose count left the jury deadlocked, said in the statement: “While I’m encouraged that Danny Masterson will face some criminal punishment, I am devastated that he has dodged criminal accountability for his heinous conduct against me.”

Prosecutors, retrying Masterson after a deadlocked jury led to a mistrial in December, said he forcibly raped three women, including a longtime girlfriend, in his Hollywood Hills home between 2001 and 2003. They told jurors he drugged the women’s drinks so he could rape them. They said he used his prominence in the church — where all three women were also members at the time — to avoid consequences for decades.

Masterson did not testify, and his lawyers called no witnesses. The defense argued that the acts were consensual, and attempted to discredit the women’s stories by highlighting changes and inconsistencies over time, which they said showed signs of coordination between them.




“If you decide that a witness deliberately lied about something in this case,” defense attorney Philip Cohen told jurors, going through their instructions in his closing argument, “You should consider not believing anything that witness says.”

The Church of Scientology played a significant role in the first trial but arguably an even larger one in the second. Judge Charlaine F. Olmedo allowed expert testimony on church policy from a former official in Scientology leadership who has become a prominent opponent.




Tensions ran high in the courtroom between current and former Scientologists, and even leaked into testimony, with the accusers saying on the stand that they felt intimidated by some members in the room.

Actor Leah Remini, a former member who has become the church’s highest-profile critic, sat in on the trial at times, putting her arm around one of the accusers to comfort her during closing arguments.

Founded in 1953 by L. Ron Hubbard, the Church of Scientology has many members who work in Hollywood. The judge kept limits on how much prosecutors could talk about the church, and primarily allowed it to explain why the women took so long to go to authorities.

The women testified that when they reported Masterson to church officials, they were told they were not raped, were put through ethics programs themselves, and were warned against going to law enforcement to report a member of such high standing.

“They were raped, they were punished for it, and they were retaliated against,” Deputy District Attorney Reinhold Mueller told jurors in his closing argument. “Scientology told them there’s no justice for them. You have the opportunity to show them there is justice.”

The church vehemently denied having any policy that forbids members from going to secular authorities.




The Associated Press does not typically name people who say they’ve been sexually abused.

Testimony in this case was graphic and emotional.

Two women, who knew Masterson from social circles in the church, said he gave them drinks and that they then became woozy or passed out before he violently raped them in 2003.

The third, Masterson’s then-girlfriend of five years, said she awoke to find him raping her, and had to pull his hair to stop him.

The issue of drugging also played a major role in the retrial. At the first, Olmedo only allowed prosecutors and accusers to describe their disorientation, and to imply that they were drugged. The second time, they were allowed to argue it directly, and the prosecution attempted to make it a major factor, to no avail.

“The defendant drugs his victims to gain control,” Deputy District Attorney Ariel Anson said in her closing argument. “He does this to take away his victims’ ability to consent.”

Masterson was not charged with any counts of drugging, and there is no toxicology evidence to back up the assertion. His attorney asked for a mistrial over the issue’s inclusion. The motion was denied, but the issue is likely to be a major factor in any potential appeal.

These charges date to a period when Masterson was at the height of his fame, starring from 1998 until 2006 as Steven Hyde on Fox’s “That ’70s Show” — the show that made stars of Ashton Kutcher, Mila Kunis and Topher Grace.

Masterson had reunited with Kutcher on the 2016 Netflix comedy “The Ranch,” but was written off the show when an LAPD investigation was revealed in December 2017.
 
The good news is that the Church of Scientology can audit you by phone and still charge him. And if that doesn't work they've got remote learning for their courses so he can still get to OT VIII even while in prison!

Rape. Nothing that a few hours of doing Lower Conditions can't handle; it isn't like the church hides or covers up or forgives rape or murder. No way that would be part of paying loads of money for the upper OT Levels. Why that's just silly.

Victims are nothing but Dev-T.
 
I think it was that Leah Remini series that really put the nails in the coffin of Scientology. But there's a new sucker born every minute. So I wouldn't be surprised if Scientology gets a second wind decades from now.

I don't think anyone, read normies, really gave a shit about Chanology, or Trapped in the Closet, or Going Clear.
There was the Louis Theroux documentary, which probably didn't help. Though that was a couple of years after Going Clear, so it's not like Louis was doing anything groundbreaking (though his exceedingly polite faux naivety schitck is always good for a laugh).

Back on topic, the real loser in this trial isn't Danny Masterson getting a 30 year sentence. It's CoS. The failure to keep one of their people out of big-boy PMITA prison has punched a pretty big hole in their credibility as a networking group and protection racket for Hollywood elites.
 
Kiwi Editorial: I read over several different articles trying to figure out what evidence the court used to convict Masterson. These accusations were 15 years old when they were made, and seemingly with no physical evidence. The best article I could find with any description of how he was found guilty was in another article by the NYT:
Judge Charlaine F. Olmedo of Los Angeles Superior Court allowed prosecutors to tell jurors directly in the second trial that Masterson had drugged his three accusers. Prosecutors only suggested the possibility of drugging in the first trial, as they presented testimony that the women felt disoriented and confused after Masterson gave them alcoholic drinks.
This is fucked up. As far as I'm aware, there were no contemporaneous evidence supporting the fact that these women were drugged. No rape kits, no drug tests, no first hand witnesses. They found him guilty on accusations without supporting evidence years after the fact. As much as I hate Hollywood Liberals/Scientologists, even they deserve the same presumption of innocence we should all be afforded.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1694124013470.png
Danny Masterson, the actor best known for his role in the sitcom “That ’70s Show,” was sentenced to 30 years to life in prison on Thursday for the rapes of two women when he was at the height of his career more than 20 years ago.

Judge Charlaine F. Olmedo of Los Angeles Superior Court handed the sentence down after hearing statements from the women, who described the lasting impact of Masterson’s actions on their lives.

“The body is a relentless witness,” one of the accusers, identified as N. Trout, said in a statement that was read aloud in the courtroom on Thursday. “When you raped me you stole from me,” she said. “That is what rape is, a theft of the spirit.”

George Gascón, the Los Angeles district attorney, said he hoped the women’s bravery would be an example to others. “Justice was finally served today,” he said, noting that one of his top priorities was to ensure “Los Angeles will no longer be a hunting ground for Hollywood elite who feel entitled to prey on women.”

Shawn Holley, a lawyer for Masterson, told reporters outside the courtroom that she was “very disappointed” in the sentence, noting that a team of lawyers had reviewed the case and found “a number of significant evidentiary and constitutional issues” that they planned to to use in appeals.

“Though we have great respect for the jury, and for our system of justice, sometimes they get it wrong — and that’s what happened here,” Holley said, noting that Masterson maintains his innocence.
Masterson, 47, played Steven Hyde on “That ’70s Show” from 1998 to 2006 and also starred in the television comedy “Men at Work” from 2012 to 2014. More recently, he appeared in the Netflix comedy “The Ranch,” but was fired from the show in 2017 after the rape allegations emerged.

The case against Masterson drew widespread attention, and at times mirrored a television saga, in part because of accusations that the Church of Scientology, to which Masterson belonged, had tried to discourage his accusers.

In May, Masterson was convicted of raping two women at his home in the Hollywood Hills in the early 2000s. The jury deadlocked on a charge that the actor had raped a third woman.

The mixed verdict was delivered after a jury deadlocked on all three charges in November, resulting in a mistrial.

The retrial this spring lasted more than a month before Masterson was found guilty of two counts of rape by force or fear.

The legal case against Masterson began unfolding in 2020, when he was charged with three counts. He pleaded not guilty.

The case was closely watched not only because it involved a Hollywood star on trial in the #MeToo era but also because two of the women had accused the Church of Scientology, to which they also belonged, of discouraging them from reporting the rapes to the authorities. The church denied that it pressured the victims.

One accuser, who was identified as Christina B. and who said Masterson raped her in 2001 when they were in a relationship, reported the rape to the church’s “ethics officer,” according to court documents. That officer told her, according to the documents, “You can’t rape someone that you’re in a relationship with” and “Don’t say that word again.” In May, the jury deadlocked on the charge related to her accusation.

Court documents also said that Masterson had raped another woman, identified as Jen B., in April 2003 after he gave her a drink. Jen B., who sought the church’s permission to report the rape, later received a written response from the church’s international chief justice that cited a 1965 policy letter, which for her raised concerns she could be ousted from her family and friends if she reported a fellow Scientologist to the police. Still, she reported the rape in 2004.

The third accuser, who was identified as N. Trout and who was raped in 2003, did not tell the church but shared it with her mother and best friend. “If you have a legal situation with another member of the church, you may not handle it externally from the church, and it’s very explicit,” she said, according to court documents. She added that she “felt sufficiently intimidated by the repercussions.”

The church has maintained that it is not a party to the case, and should not be implicated. “There is not a scintilla of evidence supporting the scandalous allegations that the Church harassed the accusers,” it said in a statement following the sentencing.

But Alison Anderson, a lawyer for two of the accusers, said that her clients planned to continue holding the church accountable for attempting to silence them.

“Despite persistent harassment, obstruction and intimidation, these courageous women helped hold a ruthless sexual predator accountable today,” Anderson said. “They are eager to soon tell the fuller story of how Scientology and its enablers tried desperately to keep them from coming forward.”

Archive
NYT Link
 
As far as I'm aware, there were no contemporaneous evidence supporting the fact that these women were drugged. No rape kits, no drug tests, no first hand witnesses. They found him guilty on accusations without supporting evidence years after the fact.
Feminist's wet dream. Poor man.
 
The third, Masterson’s then-girlfriend of five years, said she awoke to find him raping her, and had to pull his hair to stop him.
Okay, I'm calling a qualified foul on that one. Yes, Masterson's a now-convicted rapist and an all-around creepy guy and no doubt the CoS covered for him, but without knowing context, I can only speak to personal experience. What Masterson's then-girlfriend is calling rape, my wife would call a Good Morning Honey--and not just me doing all the waking up, either. It sounds like the former girlfriend is going for some of that #MeToo social cachet. She can now wear the holy mantle of victimhood, call herself a rape victim for all eternity, and act as An Authority Who Must Be Heard and Believed.

Let me put it this way: I doubt her motives.
 
Okay, I'm calling a qualified foul on that one. Yes, Masterson's a now-convicted rapist and an all-around creepy guy and no doubt the CoS covered for him, but without knowing context, I can only speak to personal experience. What Masterson's then-girlfriend is calling rape, my wife would call a Good Morning Honey--and not just me doing all the waking up, either. It sounds like the former girlfriend is going for some of that #MeToo social cachet. She can now wear the holy mantle of victimhood, call herself a rape victim for all eternity, and act as An Authority Who Must Be Heard and Believed.

Let me put it this way: I doubt her motives.
That's the charge he wasn't convicted on so largely immaterial.
 
I don't think anyone, read normies, really gave a shit about Chanology, or Trapped in the Closet, or Going Clear.
South Park was pretty normie at the time. It was also one of the first mass media pieces on them that wasn't about them being a dark and sinister organization but instead about them being a ridiculous joke, and on top of that, they basically got away with it. I think that initial wave of coverage was why blood was in the water.

Or they could just be aging out of being a cult like Christian Science did. At one time, both they and the Mormons were a holy terror.
Okay, I'm calling a qualified foul on that one.
Is that the one he was acquitted on? Apparently the jury thought he was a sex creep and a rapist but not guilty of one of the charges. Even a rapist can get #metoo'ed.
 
How do you prove something beyond reasonable doubt that happened 20 years ago and there's no evidence of? Did the standard of proof in a criminal trial change while I wasn't paying attention?
Appeal to emotion is how convictions are made.
Prosecutors usually go on about "muh accountability" if there's little to no supporting evidence for their case.
 
At one time, both they and the Mormons were a holy terror.
I know we got the south park episode but most of us liked it tbh, I don't you're grouping us with the Science freaks that are gonna fly to space on DC-10's or whatever and shoot you in the back of the head if you leave
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Lord Xenu
Back