little does phil know satanism and communism do not mix. Satanism is more for close minded individualists which I’m pretty sure Marx was against lmfao. Just goes to show Ass Pen SatanASS just subscribed to whichever ideology he thinks is cooler.
Marx himself wouldn’t approve of modern Communism. Nor would Engles, Lenin or Stalin. Marx was himself a pretty racist person. Engels was extremely homophobic, Lenin denounced all the stuff they’re talking about today as “Bourgeois Degeneracy”, and the people following what modern Commies seem to all believe in Stalin had killed. Mao might approve if it served to subvert the order of things to establish more power for himself but that’s it…. Literally. Tito and Ho were more of Nationalists than Communists, Hoxha and Coscaescu were control freaks and Pol Pot was… well a unique individual to say the least. None of them would approve of Communism in its current form and a lot of it, despite what many of them may say is either directly or indirectly inspired be Leon Trotsky.
Something people do not realize is that until the October Revolution Trotsky and Lenin did not like each other. Lenin seriously did think Trotsky was the most dangerous person to his movement and vision for the Soviet Union. Despite a lot of the claims, so did a lot of other people loyal to Lenin. Whether or not he really wanted Stalin as his successor or not is debatable. There’s a chance he really was afraid that Stalin was almost as bad as Trotsky but a lot of evidence also points otherwise. Either way keep this in mind, Trotsky wanted Revolution against literally everything. I’m not even being hyperbolic about this, he wanted to tear down the very foundations of society in order to achieve a Marxist Utopia. Something even Marx himself wouldn’t have wanted per se. Trotsky only achieved credibility because believe it or not, he was really good at inspiring and commanding soldiers. Otherwise he would have been purged by Lenin or early on or shortly after the establishment of the Soviet Union as he was an outspoken critic of Bolshevism for a long time.
Well see during/after the 50s a lot of Trotskyists decided to infiltrate other groups, movements, and parties. Between the Purges in the Soviet Union, the Chinese Civil War, an Ice Pick to their leaders skull, and McCarthyism they basically lost all credibility. Today so many parties carry the label Maoist when I’m fact, they’re really more Trotskyist. A lot of the founders of Neoconservative movements were originally Trotskyist. Phil may claim all day that he’s a Maoist or Satanist or Jewish or Muslim. But he really is more than anything a Trotskyist whether he realizes it or not just by virtue (or lack thereof) of wanting to tear down Social Order and subvert things.
Also
@Marshal Mannerheim and
@The Dude as to Falun Dafa. They are an extremely strange religion and more extremist than people realize. They are not a peaceful movement and are in fact extremist. They also are not the only group with that style of thinking. Yiguandao is pretty similar in its teaching and is similarly persecuted. For all of Chinas rhetoric about Communism and Atheism, they’re actually quite Nationalistic and really don’t care all that much about Protestants or Orthodox people these days, they’re afraid of Papal influence for Catholics so they basically said “Fuck it we’re starting our own Catholic Church”, Muslims are more tolerated than people realize although they do monitor every Mosque in the country, they don’t give a fuck about Buddhism or Taoism, or Folk Religion, and while pretty much everything else is banned or at least restricted, if you aren’t doing it in public nobody will bother you. If I’m not mistaken Manichaeism still exists as a form of Buddhism in China; the very last place in the world it’s been preserved and nobody really bothers them about it.
theasiadialogue.com
