Disaster Adobe, Arm, Intel, and Microsoft form content authenticity coalition - Mass deplatforming with the power of Microsoft Azure™


Adobe, Arm, Intel, and Microsoft have partnered with photo verification platform Truepic and the BBC to form the Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA).

The coalition, open to further membership, is seeking to address the prevalence of disinformation, misinformation, and online content fraud through developing technical standards for certifying the source and history or provenance of media content.

Member organisations will work together to develop content provenance specifications for common asset types and formats, they said in a statement, to enable publishers, creators, and consumers to trace the origin and evolution of a piece of media, including images, videos, audio, and documents.

These technical specifications will include defining what information is associated with each type of asset, how that information is presented and stored, and how evidence of tampering can be identified.

"There's a critical need to address widespread deception in online content -- now supercharged by advances in AI and graphics and diffused rapidly via the internet," Microsoft chief scientific officer Eric Horvitz said.

"Our imperative as researchers and technologists is to create and refine technical and sociotechnical approaches to this grand challenge of our time. We're excited about methods for certifying the origin and provenance of online content."

Adobe general counsel Dana Rao said the C2PA would accelerate the critical work of rebuilding the public's trust in online content.

The coalition said the C2PA's open standard will give platforms a method to preserve and read provenance-based digital content.

"Because an open standard can be adopted by any online platform, it is critical to scaling trust across the internet," the statement continued.

"In addition to the inclusion of varied media types at scale, C2PA is driving an end-to-end provenance experience from the capturing device to the information consumer. Collaboration with chipmakers, news organisations, and software and platform companies is critical to facilitate a comprehensive provenance standard and drive broad adoption across the content ecosystem."

The formation of the C2PA brings together founding members of the Adobe-led Content Authenticity Initiative (CAI) and the Microsoft and BBC-led Project Origin.

CALL FOR AN EU VERSION OF AUSTRALIA'S MEDIA CODE​

With Australia's News Media Bargaining Code -- a piece of legislation directing Google and Facebook to pay to display local news content -- hours away from passage, Microsoft has called for a similar mandate to be introduced in Europe.

Microsoft vice president Brad Smith earlier this month published a blog post that praised the Australian government for the code and said the US should take notice, even going as far as saying the code should be copied by the Biden Administration.

On Tuesday, Microsoft rallied support from a handful of Europe's press publishers, having agreed to work together on a solution for how the former could be paid for the use of their content by "gatekeepers that have dominant market power".

Microsoft said the outcome should be in line with the objectives of the new neighbouring right in the EU Digital Single Market Copyright Directive, which comes into force in June, and that it should take inspiration from the new Australian legislation.

"Although press publishers have been granted a neighbouring right in the EU, negotiations with such gatekeepers will not produce fair outcomes unless additional regulatory measures are brought forward to address gatekeepers with dominant market power, through appropriate regulatory frameworks such as the Digital Markets Act, Digital Services Act, or other national laws," Microsoft wrote.

"EMMA, ENPA, EPC, NME, and Microsoft therefore call for an arbitration mechanism to be implemented in European or national law requiring such gatekeepers to pay for press content in full respect of the Publisher's Right set out in Directive 2019/790."

Microsoft said it welcomes proposals made by several members of the European Parliament to introduce a final arbitration mechanism into relevant regulation.

"This is needed to prevent undermining the scope of the publishers' right and to create legal certainty. Otherwise, even though press publishers have a neighbouring right, they might not have the economic strength to negotiate fair and balanced agreements with these gatekeeper tech companies, who might otherwise threaten to walk away from negotiations or exit markets entirely," the tech giant said.

---

 
So let me get this straight...
  • The PDF and Photoshop guys that killed flash
  • The creators of the spyware operating system known as Windows 10 and the guys in bed with the CIA/NSA
  • Two chip/processor makers, one of them having exploits up the ass
Bubsy-wrong.jpg
 
It is funny to me that they think they can stop the flow of information. They might be able to slow it or cause it to carve a new route to people but they are not going to be able to stop it. If anything they will just harm the ability of law enforcement to monitor those who are actually dangerous. Those people will definitely go offline if they have not already.
 
This sounds like a big nothing to me. From Microsoft's blog:
https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2021/02/22/deepfakes-disinformation-c2pa-origin-cai/
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.07886.pdf

We now have an Origin technical proof of concept that establishes a chain of trust between the publisher and the end user. You can learn more here or watch this fun video featuring Rico. The basic idea is that a publisher of a media file, in this case a video, will cryptographically sign a digital fingerprint of the file at the time of publication. That signature and fingerprint become part of a ledger and a receipt is sent to the publisher. When a consumer views the file, the browser or video player checks the ledger for the manifest and receipt, then displays a signal to the user indicating whether that content is certified.

In other words, they're using a blockchain (lol) to store information on what media was published by who, and they're trying to make it so minimal levels of editing won't break the "fingerprint". All well and good, but is there really an epidemic of people impersonating CNN and photoshopping real footage into fakes? I dunno, I don't read Boomerbook, maybe there is.

But that aside, isn't most "wrongthink" really about just talking about real things that the authorities would prefer you didn't? If anything, this system might be good for freedom of thought because it makes it impossible for publishers to memory-hole things. You signed the file, you put it on the blockchain, and now you can never deny it. Even if you scrub the file from the internet, anyone can come back with their own private copy at any time and prove that it's the same file you tried to suppress, because the signatures match.
 
Adobe general counsel Dana Rao said the C2PA would accelerate the critical work of rebuilding the public's trust in online content.
honestly, people should NOT trust online content, period. or mass media in general. it's all way too easy to abuse for propaganda purposes, and filtering out the framing and spin they put on everything is so time consuming and exhausting that i sometimes think it would be better to just ignore it all entirely.
 
honestly, people should NOT trust online content, period. or mass media in general. it's all way too easy to abuse for propaganda purposes, and filtering out the framing and spin they put on everything is so time consuming and exhausting that i sometimes think it would be better to just ignore it all entirely.
People shouldn't but they will regardless. Scaring people is easy when you hammer the nail in enough from all possible sources.
 
So let me get this straight...
  • The PDF and Photoshop guys that killed flash
  • The creators of the spyware operating system known as Windows 10 and the guys in bed with the CIA/NSA
  • Two chip/processor makers, one of them having exploits up the ass
View attachment 1947439
It means I can finally track where all the memes came from. We'll be able to pinpoint the exact date and time where OCs were created and where they were posted.
 
This sounds like a big nothing to me. From Microsoft's blog:
https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2021/02/22/deepfakes-disinformation-c2pa-origin-cai/
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.07886.pdf



In other words, they're using a blockchain (lol) to store information on what media was published by who, and they're trying to make it so minimal levels of editing won't break the "fingerprint". All well and good, but is there really an epidemic of people impersonating CNN and photoshopping real footage into fakes? I dunno, I don't read Boomerbook, maybe there is.

But that aside, isn't most "wrongthink" really about just talking about real things that the authorities would prefer you didn't? If anything, this system might be good for freedom of thought because it makes it impossible for publishers to memory-hole things. You signed the file, you put it on the blockchain, and now you can never deny it. Even if you scrub the file from the internet, anyone can come back with their own private copy at any time and prove that it's the same file you tried to suppress, because the signatures match.
i'd be more concerned about the low level side of things. i could see them push things like file formats for videos and images where identifying information (time, date and location of the files creation, and maybe some sort of ID unique to the device used in creating the file) is hard embedded in the file in a way that it can't be removed or altered without destroying the file in the process. maybe even make windows secretly add timestamps and user information to such files whenever a file is saved or copied. if such a system were to be implemented it could push online surveillance to levels never seen before.

basically, my paranoid fear is that the talk about "media integrity" and "combating disinformation" is just the PR departments talking to placate the normies, but what is actually being created here is the foundation for total surveillance and control of pretty much all internet users.
 
So let me get this straight...
  • The PDF and Photoshop guys that killed flash
  • The creators of the spyware operating system known as Windows 10 and the guys in bed with the CIA/NSA
  • Two chip/processor makers, one of them having exploits up the ass
View attachment 1947439
ARM is arguably the largest CPU manufacturer in the world. Pretty much every cell phone and tablet run off an ARM chip. Apple started using them in their PCs now since they're way more energy efficient and what not. At least ARM allows you to customize their CPUs to a degree. But who knows if the CCP or other countries have built in Backdoors at the root level at ARM.

Intel is one of two PC CPU makes in town. The other being AMD. They're slowly catching up to Intel in terms of popularity and have suprassed them in power. Intel is on a downward trend.

Also, Adobe is one of the leaders in deep fake tech. So there's that.
 
Even if you scrub the file from the internet, anyone can come back with their own private copy at any time and prove that it's the same file you tried to suppress, because the signatures match.
Unless you then make it illegal/impossible to upload or host something with that exact signature. I mean, if YouTube can do that with copyrighted songs then why couldn’t sites do it with a hardcoded ID?
 
It is funny to me that they think they can stop the flow of information. They might be able to slow it or cause it to carve a new route to people but they are not going to be able to stop it. If anything they will just harm the ability of law enforcement to monitor those who are actually dangerous. Those people will definitely go offline if they have not already.
The sad truth is that they don't need to stop all of it to get what they want, they just have to control it for a large enough majority of the populace that they can't be challenged, and they can easily do that. Every normal consumer uses products from more than 1 of these companies in their day to day lives. The ability of something like Intel or ARM to actually censor content is questionable, but if it were to happen it would be catastrophic. The longer it takes for people to wise up about this kind've shit the harder it will be to stop, and its probably already too late. The average normie is fully willing to be a slave to these megacorps as long as they can consoom, and they don't realize the consequences.
ARM is arguably the largest CPU manufacturer in the world. Pretty much every cell phone and tablet run off an ARM chip. Apple started using them in their PCs now since they're way more energy efficient and what not. At least ARM allows you to customize their CPUs to a degree. But who knows if the CCP or other countries have built in Backdoors at the root level at ARM.

Intel is one of two PC CPU makes in town. The other being AMD. They're slowly catching up to Intel in terms of popularity and have suprassed them in power. Intel is on a downward trend.

Also, Adobe is one of the leaders in deep fake tech. So there's that.
ARM and Intel are the biggest wildcards to me in this. They are the backbone of the vast majority of computers in the world, with AMD as the only real competitor. (and don't think if something big like this were to be effective AMD wouldn't join in too). However, I don't really see what they could do to actually censor content. The cpu is too low level for them to target individual websites they dislike as far as I understand, and even if they were to do such a thing I doubt its an update thats easy to push out. The only thing I could see them doing would be to try and restrict distribution of their parts or give resources to other megacorps trying to censor content (they're already big enough they could do it without them). Maybe it'll be hard for Andrew Torba to acquire cpus for his next Gab chinkbox reskin, but I don't think that will change much in the long run. The notion of these companies doing something is terrifying, but I'm not sure if they could feasibly do it.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: frozenrunner
Back