Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This chart claims 16%, though as you say, they did adjust the cutoff point downward.Literally more than half.
Many such cases:When it turned out to be a black muslim duo (who, incidentally, had the goal of murdering 6 white people per day during the first 30 days), the racial aspect was promptly dropped.




Why go to so much trouble? Just get rid of them.The real problem is that we don't do anything with them, even if it is only 16%. At the very least, they should be wards of the state and evaluated as to their violent tendencies. If they're not prone to violence (or to behaviors like peeing on people in theaters) then fine, they can walk around freely.
Black people have a whole host of problems - it's not just that they're stupid, they also have trouble regulating emotions, which means they'll get angry when a person of another race would just shrug and move on.
But, evaluating people for retardation and institutionalizing those who are a danger is at least a partial solution.
this is what i mean when i say blacks commit the weirdest and most random of crimes
You have a completely simplistic idea of what nurture is and how it can affect people
You have a completely simplistic idea of what nurture is and how it can affect people
That only proves the incredible effects of nature, not the lack of input nurture hasThere is a strong correlation between the rates of criminality of close family members. Say between parents and their children, or between siblings.
And that correlation is absent in the case of adopted children.
These people are always throwing tantrums, it's like a child's mentality, "I didn't get what I want so I'll inconvenience everyone else today!" they don't have the adult capacity to understand that their argument is between them and the cashier, or whichever other individual, they just get in a cranky mood and start flipping outNot gonna lie the first thing I thought of when I saw this was that old Dave Chappelle line. "Oh my God! Mickey's a Mexican!"
Although I felt really bad for that crying "Oh Chuckie no" in the back.
Woman trashes Dollar Tree after claiming the cashier skipped her in line:
View attachment 7918042
That only proves the incredible effects of nature, not the lack of input nurture has
Many regular hairdressers know how to handle negro hair, it's different to white hair, but you don't need ancient juju advice from your African ancestors to figure it outNigger logic- Move to country where people have normal hair. Complain it's hard to find hairdressers to specialize in nigger hair.
BBC logic- Think this story has more priority than the millions of actual Brits who wait weeks or longer for a GP appointment
View attachment 7919145
Ahhhh, lovely Peccan Street in Austin, Texas.
Constant public surveillance is something that our modern society necessitates, average people permit it because of criminals like that
Think about how many liberty infringing laws have been passed just to prop up the completely unnatural 'multicultural society'. The civil rights act in the US, the race relations act and 'hate-speech' laws in the UK and their equivalents in other countries. Not to mention the constant surveillance, fortifications against vans of peace etc. And even the law abiding shitskins corrupt our cultures, take up resources, transform our countries into the third world shit holes that they 'escaped' from, in search of a 'better life'. I hate them and their enablers so much bros.Constant public surveillance is something that our modern society necessitates, average people permit it because of criminals like that
It's a shame that we have to live in a world where we are constantly spied on- not BECAUSE of crime like this, no, that's not the main reason, but it's the main reason regular everyday people allow it to happen- and the solution is not to suddenly turn off all surveillance, but to first create a society where it's not needed, and then turn it off
On one hand, if what it takes is a buncha negroes to lessen this surveillance, that's just a silver lining on a big problem, it's not ideal, but i'll take it
On the other hand, it's sad to think that these criminals are both the cause for this sorry state of our society and simultaneously the only thing being taken into account when considering how harmful it is, not the good people who are being spied on at all hours of the day, but the daily nigger who looked bad behaving like a nigger
No argument here that there have been numerous instances in which whitey was publicly slimed for crimes committed by people of melanin.Many such cases:
You can't judge the early scientific minds by today's standards. Benjamin Franklin screwed around with lighting that could have easily killed him, Marie Curie died of radiation related death. Freud had some things right and some things wrong. I consider these people pioneers in their perspective fields and I don't hold them accountable to the level of knowledge you and I have when we can just google "is exposure radiation dangerous"?Freud was an idiot.
Yes it does. Adopted children has almost no measurable correlation with their adopted family members with regards to rates of criminality. Wheres people who share genes have a large correlation. This proves that shared genes matters a lot, whereas a shared environment matters little.

Gotta love the American Coon-Lovers Union. Why does anybody actually support them when the Institute for Justice does the actual work the ACLU pretends to want to do instead of spending millions on virtue signalling and propaganda?
exactly rightYou can't judge the early scientific minds by today's standards. Benjamin Franklin screwed around with lighting that could have easily killed him, Marie Curie died of radiation related death. Freud had some things right and some things wrong. I consider these people pioneers in their perspective fields and I don't hold them accountable to the level of knowledge you and I have when we can just google "is exposure radiation dangerous"?
Freud was less than 100 years ago and much of Science comes from ancient Greece. Theories today treated as solid fact started as ideas from Jesuit scholars, like Athanasius Kircher. It's not right to call people like Freud people early scientists.You can't judge the early scientific minds by today's standards. Benjamin Franklin screwed around with lighting that could have easily killed him, Marie Curie died of radiation related death. Freud had some things right and some things wrong. I consider these people pioneers in their perspective fields and I don't hold them accountable to the level of knowledge you and I have when we can just google "is exposure radiation dangerous"?