African-American Appreciation Thread - Not Actually an Appreciation Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Literally more than half.
This chart claims 16%, though as you say, they did adjust the cutoff point downward.

EDIT: not sure why the forum software doesn't like this file - I tried converting it to another format and uploading it but still no dice. Here it is uploaded to another website: https://files.catbox.moe/3jaudg.png

The real problem is that we don't do anything with them, even if it is only 16%. At the very least, they should be wards of the state and evaluated as to their violent tendencies. If they're not prone to violence (or to behaviors like peeing on people in theaters) then fine, they can walk around freely.

Black people have a whole host of problems - it's not just that they're stupid, they also have trouble regulating emotions, which means they'll get angry when a person of another race would just shrug and move on.

But, evaluating people for retardation and institutionalizing those who are a danger is at least a partial solution.

When it turned out to be a black muslim duo (who, incidentally, had the goal of murdering 6 white people per day during the first 30 days), the racial aspect was promptly dropped.
Many such cases:
mass shooter ahmad al-issa - twitter.webp

The national news picked up the story of the killing of Jasmine Barnes because the initial reports said the killer what white:
Jasmine Barnes.webp

When it turned out the killer was black, they immediately dropped it. A little girl killed by a black man is just another Tuesday. It's only national news when the killer is white.

Even when they know immediately that a suspect is black, they'll sometimes try to make him look white:
tumblr_5c7bdfca7935893c2d198eb071af7631_72ea92d4_1280.webp

...or pretend his crimes weren't perpetrated by a person
1666735579353120.webp
 

Attachments

  • cognitive tiers.webp
    cognitive tiers.webp
    101.6 KB · Views: 68
  • cognitive tiers.webp
    cognitive tiers.webp
    13 MB · Views: 73
The real problem is that we don't do anything with them, even if it is only 16%. At the very least, they should be wards of the state and evaluated as to their violent tendencies. If they're not prone to violence (or to behaviors like peeing on people in theaters) then fine, they can walk around freely.

Black people have a whole host of problems - it's not just that they're stupid, they also have trouble regulating emotions, which means they'll get angry when a person of another race would just shrug and move on.

But, evaluating people for retardation and institutionalizing those who are a danger is at least a partial solution.
Why go to so much trouble? Just get rid of them.
 
this is what i mean when i say blacks commit the weirdest and most random of crimes
literally every single outing with them is like the biggest shitposter DM in the world randomly throwing an event at you
>We enter a tavern and look around for our informant-
>Ok, roll
>What? Why?
>Just... *Snickers* Just do it bro
>Uhh, ok... 14?
>An orc comes and pisses on


the dramatic anime movie music playing as the backdrop to the fight is pretty fucking funny
 
Last edited:
You have a completely simplistic idea of what nurture is and how it can affect people

There is a strong correlation between the rates of criminality of close family members. Say between parents and their children, or between siblings.

And that correlation is absent in the case of adopted children.
 
There is a strong correlation between the rates of criminality of close family members. Say between parents and their children, or between siblings.

And that correlation is absent in the case of adopted children.
That only proves the incredible effects of nature, not the lack of input nurture has
If nurture had so little to do with how a person develops and what they become, most lolcows wouldn't be who they are considering how many of them have sane and mentally healthy family members

You also have to take into account that most foster children don't feel as strong of a connected to their parents so the input they may have on them is lesser, and the reason why rates of criminality are so high with them compared to their families is BECAUSE of the system, the inherent abuse in said system, and at times the uncertainty of survival and the emotional trauma of feeling unwanted
This, if anything, is an even bigger argument in favor of the immense effects of nurture
Not gonna lie the first thing I thought of when I saw this was that old Dave Chappelle line. "Oh my God! Mickey's a Mexican!"

Although I felt really bad for that crying "Oh Chuckie no" in the back.

Woman trashes Dollar Tree after claiming the cashier skipped her in line:


View attachment 7918042
These people are always throwing tantrums, it's like a child's mentality, "I didn't get what I want so I'll inconvenience everyone else today!" they don't have the adult capacity to understand that their argument is between them and the cashier, or whichever other individual, they just get in a cranky mood and start flipping out
You can see it begin when she starts pouting and kinda slapping things on the register around, before it develops into a full blown melty
1 to 1 this is how toddlers look when they get going
 
Last edited:
That only proves the incredible effects of nature, not the lack of input nurture has

Yes it does. Adopted children has almost no measurable correlation with their adopted family members with regards to rates of criminality. Wheres people who share genes have a large correlation. This proves that shared genes matters a lot, whereas a shared environment matters little.
 
Nigger logic- Move to country where people have normal hair. Complain it's hard to find hairdressers to specialize in nigger hair.

BBC logic- Think this story has more priority than the millions of actual Brits who wait weeks or longer for a GP appointment

n.webp
 
Nigger logic- Move to country where people have normal hair. Complain it's hard to find hairdressers to specialize in nigger hair.

BBC logic- Think this story has more priority than the millions of actual Brits who wait weeks or longer for a GP appointment

View attachment 7919145
Many regular hairdressers know how to handle negro hair, it's different to white hair, but you don't need ancient juju advice from your African ancestors to figure it out
Black women just won't go to them, because they hate them, and their entire mindset is thinking "wypipo dun be undassanin' us"

If a white woman walked into a salon, saw a black woman, and walked out because she doesn't want her hair treated by her, they'd label her so racist that the KKK would get downright jealous
 
Constant public surveillance is something that our modern society necessitates, average people permit it because of criminals like that
It's a shame that we have to live in a world where we are constantly spied on- not BECAUSE of crime like this, no, that's not the main reason, but it's the main reason regular everyday people allow it to happen- and the solution is not to suddenly turn off all surveillance, but to first create a society where it's not needed, and then turn it off

On one hand, if what it takes is a buncha negroes to lessen this surveillance, that's just a silver lining on a big problem, it's not ideal, but i'll take it
On the other hand, it's sad to think that these criminals are both the cause for this sorry state of our society and simultaneously the only thing being taken into account when considering how harmful it is, not the good people who are being spied on at all hours of the day, but the daily nigger who looked bad behaving like a nigger
 
Constant public surveillance is something that our modern society necessitates, average people permit it because of criminals like that
It's a shame that we have to live in a world where we are constantly spied on- not BECAUSE of crime like this, no, that's not the main reason, but it's the main reason regular everyday people allow it to happen- and the solution is not to suddenly turn off all surveillance, but to first create a society where it's not needed, and then turn it off

On one hand, if what it takes is a buncha negroes to lessen this surveillance, that's just a silver lining on a big problem, it's not ideal, but i'll take it
On the other hand, it's sad to think that these criminals are both the cause for this sorry state of our society and simultaneously the only thing being taken into account when considering how harmful it is, not the good people who are being spied on at all hours of the day, but the daily nigger who looked bad behaving like a nigger
Think about how many liberty infringing laws have been passed just to prop up the completely unnatural 'multicultural society'. The civil rights act in the US, the race relations act and 'hate-speech' laws in the UK and their equivalents in other countries. Not to mention the constant surveillance, fortifications against vans of peace etc. And even the law abiding shitskins corrupt our cultures, take up resources, transform our countries into the third world shit holes that they 'escaped' from, in search of a 'better life'. I hate them and their enablers so much bros.
 
Many such cases:
No argument here that there have been numerous instances in which whitey was publicly slimed for crimes committed by people of melanin.

What made the Beltway sniper attacks in October 2002 unique is that Muhammad and Malvo didn't go in POP POP POP wit dey gats (as they did previously in September) but, rather, spent weeks terrorizing the DC area while evading and taunting the feds. So, "obviously," it had to be the work of an angry white guy.

Were it not for their hubris, they would've murdered many more.
 
Freud was an idiot.
You can't judge the early scientific minds by today's standards. Benjamin Franklin screwed around with lighting that could have easily killed him, Marie Curie died of radiation related death. Freud had some things right and some things wrong. I consider these people pioneers in their perspective fields and I don't hold them accountable to the level of knowledge you and I have when we can just google "is exposure radiation dangerous"?

Just another Friday night in the world's biggest ghetto- the USA


View attachment 7918656

I feel like I need lifetime prescription for Valtrex just from watching that video. Who else caught the ankle monitor?


Yes it does. Adopted children has almost no measurable correlation with their adopted family members with regards to rates of criminality. Wheres people who share genes have a large correlation. This proves that shared genes matters a lot, whereas a shared environment matters little.

I'm assuming you mean increased criminality, negative traits?

I only have anecdotal opinion on this. The only time I've ever heard of a an adoptive parents, as in truly no blood a family relation being a negative in a child's life were homosexual couples adopting then sexually abusing them. Abuse leads to 101 psychological problems, a lot of which leads to things like drug addiction, prison, suicide and repeating a cycle of child abuse. Every other single time I've seen an adoptive parents they do far better than their parents have although there is still the genetic factors at play you can't really fix. I supposed you can treat them if it's mild psychological issues.




Very related story: Ronnie O'Neal of Florida. Nigger has a full on psychotic episode something something the mother of the children was a "white demon", kills the mother of his child kills his disabled daughter and tries to kill his son with a knife. IIRC The detective investigating the double homicide + attempted homicide would later adopt O'Neals's son. I don't keep tabs on random people in the news but, I'd imagine wherever that kid is he's doing better as apart of the Detectives family, as his adopted son.

O'neal is serving 3 life sentences after a trial where he acted as his own attorney. The only funny part of the story is watching of him trying to argue a double homicide case Pro se doing a Luis Farrakhan impersonation/Malcolm X impersonation; with the worst haircut I've seen in about 10 years.

best haircut ever.webp

O'Neal psychically channels Malcom X's "angry nigger energy" for his opening statement of his own Murder trial. It goes just about as well as you'd expect.


Ripped from Wikipedia:
On November 25, 2019, Ronnie IV was adopted by detective Mike Blair, who cared for him the night of the murders. Ronnie IV changed his name to Ronnie Blair when he joined the family of seven, including Mike, his wife Danyel, and their five other children, ages 16 to 23. Mike recalled the night of the murders, saying that there was "no expectation Ronnie would live" and that he considers Ronnie's recovery to be a miracle. Of the adoption, Ronnie says that he is "loved" and "part of the family."
BLAIR-FAMILY.webp


I post stories like this because mainstream media ignores them, BLM pretends they don't exist and tards like @Carpalorbit won't even comment on them. I hope the kid grows up and becomes the next Dr Ben Carson.
 
Gotta love the American Coon-Lovers Union. Why does anybody actually support them when the Institute for Justice does the actual work the ACLU pretends to want to do instead of spending millions on virtue signalling and propaganda?

Oh, right, the Soros-owned media supports the fake "civil rights" NGO, not the real one, because Soros doesn't want you having actual rights.
 
You can't judge the early scientific minds by today's standards. Benjamin Franklin screwed around with lighting that could have easily killed him, Marie Curie died of radiation related death. Freud had some things right and some things wrong. I consider these people pioneers in their perspective fields and I don't hold them accountable to the level of knowledge you and I have when we can just google "is exposure radiation dangerous"?
exactly right

besides, Frued is actually very much vilified today, and i think it's largely not because what he said is wrong, but because what he said is uncomfortable
people don't want to think about strange sexual fixations that even they themselves may likely have, it needs to be something distant that only weirdos befitting of being psychoanalyzed have, not me, not the normals, not me i'm normal, not me!!!
that or acknowledge that certain nonsexual and even childhood related things may lead to sexual fetishes, or that part of how we engage with sex has to do with other nonsexual social factors... again, especially, *especially* if it comes alongside the caveat that yet, this applies to you, fellow normie
not just the weirdos and crazies, but you, the average joe
that's the part that makes them most uncomfortable, Freud said uncomfortable things, much of which is true, much of which is false, but it was all things we don't want to think about and that's why we discredit him, even where he's right
it just makes us feel "icky"
 
You can't judge the early scientific minds by today's standards. Benjamin Franklin screwed around with lighting that could have easily killed him, Marie Curie died of radiation related death. Freud had some things right and some things wrong. I consider these people pioneers in their perspective fields and I don't hold them accountable to the level of knowledge you and I have when we can just google "is exposure radiation dangerous"?
Freud was less than 100 years ago and much of Science comes from ancient Greece. Theories today treated as solid fact started as ideas from Jesuit scholars, like Athanasius Kircher. It's not right to call people like Freud people early scientists.

Sentimentality is a kind of evil sickness.
 
Back
Top Bottom