- Joined
- Feb 10, 2020
It's the Social Harm Theory, or the Oppression Olympics, whichever phrase you prefer. It's this liberal belief that any difference between people is a privilege/oppression dichotomy, where cisgender heterosexual white able-bodied men are at the height of privilege and transgender queer non-white disabled women are at the bottom. The more privileged you are, the more evil you are, because you've experienced less hardship. That's the part liberals acknowledge and affirm. The unspoken part that I saw pointed out here...I think either in an Amren article or in a 4chan greentext (equally valid sources of information lol) was whichever identity causes the most harm to a healthy society is the one that wins the Oppression Olympics.
If a white transwoman nurse rapes a black immigrant cis woman in her care, the transwoman is still the victim/most oppressed because being transgender is more dysgenic to society than being a cis woman in the hospital. When it comes to disability, same rules apply. A normal white man in a wheelchair who mostly functions but has mobility issues isn't nearly as oppressed as a schizo black man who stabs women on the train, because he's less harmful to society than the violent schizo.
I understand how the liberals got to this point, at least in terms of seeing "taking care of the schizo" as oppression/bigotry against the disabled. A lot of asylums and institutions were horrible fucking nightmare holes, there's a reason we set haunted houses and video games and movies in abandoned asylums. People were tortured and killed in these places, and most of them weren't violent schizos that "deserved" that treatment. It was bad, and I get not wanting to continue that, but not doing ANYTHING about the disabled is clearly an over-correction. There has to be some middle ground between just throwing any and everybody into an asylum to be lobotomized and tortured, and not doing anything at all.
even in their fleshlight fantasies they are imagining pounding another dude.