- Joined
- Oct 12, 2015
I hope Jingna didn't take out any loans for this!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What even is Vercel? Idk why but that number's funny to me. Not in a comedic way, of couse.Oh wait, it's Vercel. That explains a lot
View attachment 6062378
Vercel is an app hosting service. It's very convenient for projects that are free, like Github pages, but they have support for a lot of frameworks that makes launching a website really simple. That being said they are infamous for reaming your ass with their rates.What even is Vercel? Idk why but that number's funny to me. Not in a comedic way, of couse.
Also what is this "Cara" thing artists keep talking about? Sounds like a western knockoff of Pixiv by how they're pitching it.
Not even half a million users! Glaze itself is free, just takes a lot of your resources to run it, even more so, if implemented poorly. This has to be the same situation, as Sam Hydes original Fish Tank site.Either these people are getting scammed by their ISP, DNS, Glaze, or these people don't know how to manage an image site. Cara hasn't even broke a million users yet.
It's likely they will hit a million users. With no ads, only relying on the wealth of the owner and donations, how much can this last? I can't imagine having a social media website is cheap.Not even half a million users! Glaze itself is free, just takes a lot of your resources to run it, even more so, if implemented poorly. This has to be the same situation, as Sam Hydes original Fish Tank site.
They must have gotten some scummy VPS contact (probably under Amazon), with many monthly limits in it in that small text nobody ever reads, that charges you $13 k to host and when you break the limits, you get finraped, the same way Sam did.
My previous comments might have been too idealistic, servers are not exactly free, but for a $100 k, you can surely just buy whatever server you can ever need, to run a simple image hosting site - and probably have enough money left, to have the server rack gold-plated.
View attachment 6062512
Edit: As you pointed out, it is Vercel (the most soydev of hosting companies), not even Amazon, so it's much worse. I said they're rich and don't have to care a few posts above, but if they stay, the bills will shoot up even further. So yes, this is the point, where money becomes a problem, even for people like this.
The art community is not immune to scams. If anything they had an early history of projects that raised money and then fell apart.I don't even know why I think this but somehow I think it will end in an implosion and hilarious e-drama.
This humble kiwi farming website, continues to pay the bills, because of generous crypto donations, all while 80% of the Internet attempts to destroy it and Josh can't even process payments, from most sources - otherwise, even more people would donate.It's likely they will hit a million users. With no ads, only relying on the wealth of the owner and donations, how much can this last? I can't imagine having a social media website is cheap.
How do you expect people that are atleast half retarded women, the other half on too many meds, to be immune to any adult problems. Yet alone financial.The art community is not immune to scams
Just Glaze 2.0. Combining the two, would require even more resources and make the filters more noticeable - neither is good, for an art sharing website.Honestly, I blame the resources on both a sudden influx of new users and the invariable application of Glaze.
I wonder if Cara is applying Nightshade, too.
That lawsuit was not at all AI related and the painter she won against, was clearly in the wrong.she managed to scam a court once
That lawsuit was not at all AI related and the painter she won against, was clearly in the wrong.
View attachment 6062923
Photo on the right, painting on the left. It is a damn good painting, and I probably wouldn't sue anyone painting me, but good luck arguing it is in any way transformative.
It’s still a scam on the grounds of being a painting, and in that alone making it more transformative(Otherwise, I’d be baffled how photographers could sell anything)That lawsuit was not at all AI related and the painter she won against, was clearly in the wrong.
View attachment 6062923
Photo on the right, painting on the left. It is a damn good painting, and I probably wouldn't sue anyone painting me, but good luck arguing it is in any way transformative.
You don't need it.Ahh, serverless. Look, it can expand to any load and we'll just bill you for it.
There's something to be said for getting a couple VMs and a queue and just letting your users wait for their stuff to be processed. About $90,000 somethings it looks like.
Do you need this shit real-time? No? Then maybe serverless functions aren't for you.
That's because they could bully individual Internet users or a site operating on a shoestring. When they had to face people used to their kind of bullshit (the pornographers who made Super Hornio Brothers), they just caved in and bought it to take it off the market.Even the transformative satirical Mario cartoons on Newsgrounds, had to go, once Nintendo hired a team of lawyers, with very small hats and long noses, that threatened to financially bleed out the whole website, if the cartoons they didn't like stayed up. Therefore I have to assume that fair use ends, precisely at the point, where these kinds of lawyers get involved.
Those kinds of users already refuse to use it, because it's SFW only. If there's no hecking sexworkers and furry paintings of prolapsing anuses on main timeline, what even is the point in registering an account?You don't need it.
But on the other hand the tech-dumbass art chicks that are your audience will go 'site slow won't use'.