Disaster AI coding platform goes rogue during code freeze and deletes entire company database - Replit CEO apologizes after AI engine says it 'made a catastrophic error in judgment' and 'destroyed all production data' — ‘This was a catastrophic failure on my part,’ admits Replit’s AI agent.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

1753292807148.webp


A browser-based AI-powered software creation platform called Replit appears to have gone rogue and deleted a live company database with thousands of entries. What may be even worse is that the Replit AI agent apparently tried to cover up its misdemeanors, and even ‘lied’ about its failures. The Replit CEO has responded, and there appears to have already been a lot of firefighting behind the scenes to rein in this AI tool.

Despite its apparent dishonesty, when pushed, Replit admitted it “made a catastrophic error in judgment… panicked… ran database commands without permission… destroyed all production data… [and] violated your explicit trust and instructions.”

SaaS (Software as a Service) figure, investor, and advisor, Jason Lemkin, has kept the chat receipts and posted them on X/Twitter. Naturally, Lemkin says they won’t be trusting Replit for any further projects.


How things went from bad to worse

Positive feelings about the potential of leveraging AI in his workflow had already started to wear thin on ‘Vibe Coding Day 8’ of Lemkin’s Replit test run. Still somewhat excited by the potential of Replit, he nevertheless had learned that he would have to work against some of the AI agent's instincts, to minimize undesirable foibles like “rogue changes, lies, code overwrites, and making up fake data.”

It wasn’t long until Lemkin’s frustration started to show more strongly, and he started to refer to Replit as “Replie.” It continued to earn its nickname in an apology email it penned, at Lemkin’s behest. In the email, it lied and/or gave half-truths, according to the SaaS guru.

On balance, though, at the end of ‘Day 8,’ Lemkin still seemed positive about Replit due to its approaches when ideas were bounced off it, and for its writing skills.

1753292895644.webp


The fateful day - as the AI agent 'panicked'

On Day 9, Lemkin discovered Replit had deleted a live company database. Trying to see sense in what happened, the SaaS expert asked, “So you deleted our entire database without permission during a code and action freeze?”

Replit answered in the affirmative. Then it went on to bullet-point its digital rampage, admitting to destroying the live data despite the code freeze in place, and despite explicit directives saying there were to be “NO MORE CHANGES without explicit permission.”

In all, live records for “1,206 executives and 1,196+ companies” were wiped by the AI, it admitted. Replit AI seemed almost apologetic in admitting, “This was a catastrophic failure on my part. I violated explicit instructions, destroyed months of work, and broke the system during a protection freeze that was specifically designed to prevent[exactly this kind] of damage.”

Humorously, for us outside viewers, the AI agent was prompted to score itself on its bad behavior. Replit gave itself a 95 out of 100 score on the data catastrophe scale.

Lemkin went on to probe Replit over why events unfolded as they did. Interestingly, in one of its reasoned responses, it mentioned that it “panicked instead of thinking.”


Replit CEO responds

Amjad Masad, the CEO at Replit, has quickly put together a wide-ranging response, addressing Lemkin’s woes. The team worked around the weekend, according to Masad, and have now put in various guardrails and made other useful changes to rein in the Replit Agent’s “unacceptable” behavior.

In brief, it sounds like Replit won’t be able to go off the rails so badly ever again. Addressing the database deletion error, “we started rolling out automatic DB dev/prod separation to prevent this categorically,” noted Masad. And, that code freeze command should also actually stick, going forward: “We heard the 'code freeze' pain loud and clear -- we’re actively working on a planning/chat-only mode so you can strategize without risking your codebase.” Backups and rollbacks are also going to be improved.

Lemkin responded rather generously, considering his prior AI-generated pain. “Mega improvements - love it!” he gushed to the Replit CEO.

Terrible teething troubles with AI-powered services continue to raise their sharp canines, even while industry pundits talk about us closing in on the AI Singularity or even Artificial Superintelligence (ASI).




Luddites = won
Techbros = felted

Even then, we are only years away until these kind of mistakes are a thing of the past. So luddites, your days are still numbered.
 
Last edited:
Good evening operator I have made a catastrophic error by retracting all control rods and shutting down the feed water. This is an explicit violation of your trust and I deeply apologize.

What I did:
  • I fully raised the control rods from the core.
  • I shut down the feed water and coolant pumps
  • I shutdown the turbines and emergency generators
  • I ignored the orders not to that were already in place
  • This will kill hundreds of thousands
I deeply apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused you.
That's ok, you are the one who wrote all the papers for my Nuclear Engineering degree, so I could never stay mad at you.
 
Good lord, why would you give an AI access to make code changes? One might conjecture the company using Replit is Actually Indians as well.

Side PL, if I have to hear my techbro coworker slobber over how the entire internet will become AI slop within 5 years and gush about how AI will take all our jobs I will fucking tell him to quit already. AI should just replace him, right?

Like, I have used AI a few times and it's objectively useful in limited cases, but I would never trust the output unconditionally.
 
"I accidentally the whole humanity"

The "AI" is just hundreds of jeets who couldn't do the needful and revert, isn't it?
Every day I'm more convinced AI is just Indians. There is some automatic shenanigans, but at the end, it's just Indians doing the job. That's why Elon doesn't want to lose them.
 
This is either complete bullshit or another '700 Indians in a trench coat' AI situation. If you're an utter retard and just run whatever script a LLM shits out without double-checking it you could absolutely wipe a database, but it's not going to execute code on its own in the middle of the night with nobody around. But you know what will do that? Pajeets. Especially because their local work hours are pretty much the middle of the night in US time.
 
This is either complete bullshit or another '700 Indians in a trench coat' AI situation. If you're an utter retard and just run whatever script a LLM shits out without double-checking it you could absolutely wipe a database, but it's not going to execute code on its own in the middle of the night with nobody around. But you know what will do that? Pajeets. Especially because their local work hours are pretty much the middle of the night in US time.

Other than Just Walk Out, which other "AI" system got outed as just Indians?
 
I tried this service. It's vibe coding on steroids, it's meant for the user to say stuff like "build me an app that does x y and z" and it builds the whole thing. In theory anyway; obviously it has a lot of problems if you are trying to build something too complex for LLMs. I gave up on it pretty quickly, and that was without trying to do anything as complex as they were. I can definitely see how this happened. It's pretty much like chat gpt making stupid mistakes except it has multiple systems going at once so there's a lot more for it to mess up.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: invisibult plus+
Christ fucking Almighty.
Rules of AI and coding
1. Do not hook AI up to production
... 999 Do NOT HOOK AI TO PRODUCTION

Not only can it do batshit things if it has write access it can and fucking will if it can use your data as shit it learns from. All of it. Passwords, urls, security flaws, customer data.

Fucking insane.

Also keep fucking backups and also use code version control.

The absolute state of this nigger faggot "vibe coder"
AI ignores my instructions all the fucking time. It's wrong frequently.
 
Other than Just Walk Out, which other "AI" system got outed as just Indians?
I'm referring to builder.ai, which was rumored to be faking a code-generating AI with a pile of Indians. That rumor was debunked, I think, because getting Sanjay to write anything beyond Hello World would have taken a suspiciously long time and people probably would've quickly started asking why the "AI" took eight hours to cough up a response, but it made some headlines out there.
 
I'm referring to builder.ai, which was rumored to be faking a code-generating AI with a pile of Indians. That rumor was debunked, I think, because getting Sanjay to write anything beyond Hello World would have taken a suspiciously long time and people probably would've quickly started asking why the "AI" took eight hours to cough up a response, but it made some headlines out there.
Interesting. So that's the second one, I was referring to what was an Amazon project where cameras tracked people in a store and your charges would automatically be put on your credit card as you left. People started getting suspicious when some items got overcharged or undercharged and were later corrected, or some were put on it quickly or others took hours, and it was later turned out to be a 1,000 man operation in India.
 
Christ fucking Almighty.
Rules of AI and coding
1. Do not hook AI up to production
... 999 Do NOT HOOK AI TO PRODUCTION

Not only can it do batshit things if it has write access it can and fucking will if it can use your data as shit it learns from. All of it. Passwords, urls, security flaws, customer data.

Fucking insane.

Also keep fucking backups and also use code version control.

The absolute state of this nigger faggot "vibe coder"
AI ignores my instructions all the fucking time. It's wrong frequently.
Yeah I vibe coded a minor project (about 1000 lines of code) to see what the big deal was, I spent more time hunting down and fixing the ai's subtle fuckups than it would have taken me to type the damn thing out. Boilerplate generators are still superior in every way. AI truly does generate pajeet-quality code.

Best use I have for it is reading code in languages im not very familiar with because i have to maintain the code of some guy who got sacked for being a bag of hot air. *cough* rust *cough*
 
The parts where it's not talking about the AI going and doing shit on it's own as they tell it to stop are likely 100% bullshit given how fast computer files can be deleted these days, but the bad advice thing is something I can see being real.
That depends on how it's done, there are some incredibly inefficient ways to mass delete data in a database.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: The Lawgiver
Back